OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $65.52, OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) is priced for -0.8% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/OMF

Headline

FieldValue
TickerOMF
CompanyOneMain Holdings, Inc.
Current price$65.52/sh

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Implied growth-0.8%
Multiple paid29x operating income

Solve inputs: computed at a 6% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~10.5pp (computed at the 6% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 5.5% sits below it).

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~5.7 years; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
cohort percentile (of 17 peers)100
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.75x4justifies
Earnings0.59x3justifies
Relative0.44x4justifies
Growth0.42x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=14)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$280.530.23xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 393.2x / 395.2x / 397.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$88.680.74xyesP/E 12x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.0x / 12.0x / 14.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$154.830.42xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$73.380.89xyesBV/sh $28.80, ROE (TTM) 23.6%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$117.090.56xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$61.411.07xyesRev $4.3B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.5x / 1.8x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$234.850.28xyesEPS $6.71, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.28 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAsset$107.210.61xyesBV $28.80 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 23.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$65.940.99xyes√(22.5 × EPS $6.71 × BVPS $28.80) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarnings$111.680.59xyesFCF $3206.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$216.510.30xyesEPS $6.71 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelative$108.770.60xyesRevenue $4.25B × sector P/S 3.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$251.620.26xyesEPS $6.71 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$72.540.90xyesEPS $6.71 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Consumer and Insurance (C&I)operatingenterprise6.1B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$21.6b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)27.63x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)21.10x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-2.1%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

OneMain is a mature, high-yield consumer lender, and that frame is the key to reading it. At $58.22 every valuation family lands above the price: asset, earnings-power, peer-multiple and growth-DCF all say the stock is worth more than it trades for. The implied-expectations read backs out only about 7.8% growth, a modest bar.

The earnings and capital return are the draw. FY2025 diluted EPS was $6.56, Q1 2026 EPS was $1.95 and beat estimates, and the company pays a $1.05 quarterly dividend while buying back stock. For a lender, that is a high cash yield supported by current earnings, not a promise.

The risk is credit, not the multiple. The Q1 2026 net charge-off ratio was 8.02% with 30-plus-day delinquency at 5.37%, the cost of lending to nonprime borrowers. The thesis lives or dies on whether the credit cycle and the regulatory environment stay manageable; the cheapness is the market pricing that risk, not ignoring it.

Bull Case

Frame OneMain by what it is: a mature, scaled, nonprime consumer lender, and read the numbers through that lens. This is not a growth story to be valued on a runway; it is a cash-generative finance company to be valued on its earnings and its credit discipline. On that basis the stock is cheap. At $58.22 (June 27, 2026) every valuation family sits above the price, and the implied-expectations read requires only about 7.8% growth to justify the price. The market is paying for a lender at a discount to what its own earnings and balance sheet support.

The earnings power is large and current. FY2025 diluted EPS was $6.56, and Q1 2026 delivered $1.95, beating estimates, on pretax income of $296 million (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001584207-26-000008; Q1 2026 release). Net finance receivables stood at roughly $24.8 billion, up from $23.6 billion a year earlier (same 10-K). The franchise is a national branch-and-digital network underwriting borrowers that mainstream banks underserve, and the filing describes a consumer-lending operation built on that underwriting and on a capital structure where certain instruments earn "equity capital treatment in the calculation of effective leverage by rating agencies" (same 10-K). That is a business designed to fund a large receivables book efficiently.

The capital return seals the value case. OneMain pays a $1.05 quarterly dividend, a high cash yield against the share price, and repurchased about 1.9 million shares for $105 million in Q1 2026 while the share count drifts lower. A lender returning this much capital while still growing receivables is signaling confidence in its credit reserves and its earnings durability. For an investor who accepts that nonprime lending carries a credit cost, the combination of a discounted valuation, double-digit earnings yield, a high dividend and ongoing buybacks is the textbook setup for a value-supported income compounder.

Bear Case

The bear case is about the two external forces OneMain cannot control: the credit cycle and the regulators. This is a nonprime lender, and its borrowers are the first to feel a weakening labor market. The Q1 2026 net charge-off ratio was 8.02% with 30-plus-day delinquency at 5.37%, and the FY2025 filing details a receivables book where hundreds of millions sit in the 30-to-89-day and 90-plus-day past-due buckets at year end (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001584207-26-000008). Those losses are already high in a relatively benign economy. A rise in unemployment would push charge-offs higher across the book at once, and because the company is levered against roughly $22.4 billion of debt, even a few points of additional loss flow straight through to earnings and equity.

Regulation is the second standing threat, and it is active. The filing notes that "the CFPB and certain state regulators have acted against some lenders" and that state laws govern "types of products offered" and "reserve requirements," among other terms (same 10-K). Consumer lending to nonprime borrowers sits squarely in the crosshairs of rate caps, fee restrictions and enforcement actions. A single adverse rule on allowable rates or ancillary products could compress the spread that makes the business profitable, and the price does not appear to discount a hostile regulatory turn.

Funding cost is the quieter risk. OneMain borrows to lend, and its profitability depends on the spread between what it charges borrowers and what it pays for funding. The 10-K is explicit that it "operates in the consumer lending industry" against competitors, and its capital structure relies on continued access to securitization and unsecured debt markets at reasonable cost. If credit spreads widen in a stress scenario, the company refinances at higher rates precisely when charge-offs are rising, a double squeeze. The stock looks cheap on current earnings, but current earnings reflect a favorable point in the credit cycle. The bear case is that the cheapness is the market correctly pricing the cyclicality and the regulatory tail, not mispricing a safe business.

Valuation

OneMain is a value/asset-supported name, and the methods agree on it broadly. Every family lands above the price: asset-based methods value the equity above the price, as do the earnings-power, peer-multiple and growth-DCF families. The individual model outputs scatter high, with several earnings-and-cash-flow-based reads well above the price, reflecting that on its current profitability the stock looks inexpensive. The implied-expectations read backs out only about 7.8% growth to justify $58.22, a low bar for a lender that grew net finance receivables to roughly $24.8 billion and earned $6.56 in diluted EPS in FY2025.

For a financial, the right anchor is earnings and book value rather than a single DCF, and on those the picture is consistent: a high single-digit earnings multiple, a dividend yield well above the market, and a return on the equity base that supports the payout and the buyback. The standard valuation methods that depend on operating-margin or EV/EBITDA constructs are less meaningful for a lender, where the income statement runs on net interest and credit provisions; the cleaner read is the price relative to normalized earnings power, and that read says cheap.

The caveat the methods cannot fully capture is that a lender's earnings are only as good as its credit reserves. The valuation looks attractive because trailing earnings are strong, but those earnings are net of a charge-off ratio above 8% and depend on the adequacy of loss provisions through the cycle. If the credit environment deteriorates, reported earnings would fall and the multiple that looks low today would look fairer. The discount in the price is the market's compensation for that cyclicality and for regulatory risk, not evidence that the market has overlooked the value. Paid at this price, an investor is underwriting that OneMain's underwriting holds.

Catalysts

OneMain reported Q1 2026 on May 1, 2026: EPS of $1.95, beating the $1.89 estimate, on pretax income of $296 million and net income of $226 million, with revenue of $1.065 billion that slightly missed forecasts (Quiver Quantitative). The company declared a $1.05 quarterly dividend and repurchased about 1.9 million shares for $105 million during the quarter (StockTitan).

The catalysts to watch are all credit-driven. The Q1 net charge-off ratio of 8.02% and 30-plus-day delinquency of 5.37% are the numbers that move the stock (StockTitan results). Over the next two quarters, watch whether charge-offs and delinquencies stabilize or trend higher, whether receivables growth continues without loosening underwriting, and whether management sustains the dividend and buyback pace. Stable-to-improving credit metrics with continued capital return would support the value case, since every method already sits above the price. Rising losses, a funding-cost increase, or an adverse regulatory action on consumer-lending terms would pressure earnings and justify the discount the market is currently applying.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Consumer and Insurance (C&I) (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive OMF report on boothcheck