OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $65.52, OneMain Holdings, Inc. (OMF) is priced for -0.8% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/OMF
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | OMF |
| Company | OneMain Holdings, Inc. |
| Current price | $65.52/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Implied growth | -0.8% |
| Multiple paid | 29x operating income |
Solve inputs: computed at a 6% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~10.5pp (computed at the 6% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 5.5% sits below it).
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~5.7 years; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| cohort percentile (of 17 peers) | 100 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.75x | 4 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.59x | 3 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.44x | 4 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.42x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 5.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=14)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $280.53 | 0.23x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 393.2x / 395.2x / 397.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $88.68 | 0.74x | yes | P/E 12x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 10.0x / 12.0x / 14.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $154.83 | 0.42x | yes | Stage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $73.38 | 0.89x | yes | BV/sh $28.80, ROE (TTM) 23.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $117.09 | 0.56x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $61.41 | 1.07x | yes | Rev $4.3B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.5x / 1.8x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $234.85 | 0.28x | yes | EPS $6.71, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.28 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | $107.21 | 0.61x | yes | BV $28.80 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 23.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $65.94 | 0.99x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $6.71 × BVPS $28.80) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $111.68 | 0.59x | yes | FCF $3206.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $216.51 | 0.30x | yes | EPS $6.71 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $108.77 | 0.60x | yes | Revenue $4.25B × sector P/S 3.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $251.62 | 0.26x | yes | EPS $6.71 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $72.54 | 0.90x | yes | EPS $6.71 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer and Insurance (C&I) | operating | enterprise | 6.1B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $21.6b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 27.63x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 21.10x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -2.1% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
OneMain is a mature, high-yield consumer lender, and that frame is the key to reading it. At $58.22 every valuation family lands above the price: asset, earnings-power, peer-multiple and growth-DCF all say the stock is worth more than it trades for. The implied-expectations read backs out only about 7.8% growth, a modest bar.
The earnings and capital return are the draw. FY2025 diluted EPS was $6.56, Q1 2026 EPS was $1.95 and beat estimates, and the company pays a $1.05 quarterly dividend while buying back stock. For a lender, that is a high cash yield supported by current earnings, not a promise.
The risk is credit, not the multiple. The Q1 2026 net charge-off ratio was 8.02% with 30-plus-day delinquency at 5.37%, the cost of lending to nonprime borrowers. The thesis lives or dies on whether the credit cycle and the regulatory environment stay manageable; the cheapness is the market pricing that risk, not ignoring it.
Bull Case
Frame OneMain by what it is: a mature, scaled, nonprime consumer lender, and read the numbers through that lens. This is not a growth story to be valued on a runway; it is a cash-generative finance company to be valued on its earnings and its credit discipline. On that basis the stock is cheap. At $58.22 (June 27, 2026) every valuation family sits above the price, and the implied-expectations read requires only about 7.8% growth to justify the price. The market is paying for a lender at a discount to what its own earnings and balance sheet support.
The earnings power is large and current. FY2025 diluted EPS was $6.56, and Q1 2026 delivered $1.95, beating estimates, on pretax income of $296 million (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001584207-26-000008; Q1 2026 release). Net finance receivables stood at roughly $24.8 billion, up from $23.6 billion a year earlier (same 10-K). The franchise is a national branch-and-digital network underwriting borrowers that mainstream banks underserve, and the filing describes a consumer-lending operation built on that underwriting and on a capital structure where certain instruments earn "equity capital treatment in the calculation of effective leverage by rating agencies" (same 10-K). That is a business designed to fund a large receivables book efficiently.
The capital return seals the value case. OneMain pays a $1.05 quarterly dividend, a high cash yield against the share price, and repurchased about 1.9 million shares for $105 million in Q1 2026 while the share count drifts lower. A lender returning this much capital while still growing receivables is signaling confidence in its credit reserves and its earnings durability. For an investor who accepts that nonprime lending carries a credit cost, the combination of a discounted valuation, double-digit earnings yield, a high dividend and ongoing buybacks is the textbook setup for a value-supported income compounder.
Bear Case
The bear case is about the two external forces OneMain cannot control: the credit cycle and the regulators. This is a nonprime lender, and its borrowers are the first to feel a weakening labor market. The Q1 2026 net charge-off ratio was 8.02% with 30-plus-day delinquency at 5.37%, and the FY2025 filing details a receivables book where hundreds of millions sit in the 30-to-89-day and 90-plus-day past-due buckets at year end (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001584207-26-000008). Those losses are already high in a relatively benign economy. A rise in unemployment would push charge-offs higher across the book at once, and because the company is levered against roughly $22.4 billion of debt, even a few points of additional loss flow straight through to earnings and equity.
Regulation is the second standing threat, and it is active. The filing notes that "the CFPB and certain state regulators have acted against some lenders" and that state laws govern "types of products offered" and "reserve requirements," among other terms (same 10-K). Consumer lending to nonprime borrowers sits squarely in the crosshairs of rate caps, fee restrictions and enforcement actions. A single adverse rule on allowable rates or ancillary products could compress the spread that makes the business profitable, and the price does not appear to discount a hostile regulatory turn.
Funding cost is the quieter risk. OneMain borrows to lend, and its profitability depends on the spread between what it charges borrowers and what it pays for funding. The 10-K is explicit that it "operates in the consumer lending industry" against competitors, and its capital structure relies on continued access to securitization and unsecured debt markets at reasonable cost. If credit spreads widen in a stress scenario, the company refinances at higher rates precisely when charge-offs are rising, a double squeeze. The stock looks cheap on current earnings, but current earnings reflect a favorable point in the credit cycle. The bear case is that the cheapness is the market correctly pricing the cyclicality and the regulatory tail, not mispricing a safe business.
Valuation
OneMain is a value/asset-supported name, and the methods agree on it broadly. Every family lands above the price: asset-based methods value the equity above the price, as do the earnings-power, peer-multiple and growth-DCF families. The individual model outputs scatter high, with several earnings-and-cash-flow-based reads well above the price, reflecting that on its current profitability the stock looks inexpensive. The implied-expectations read backs out only about 7.8% growth to justify $58.22, a low bar for a lender that grew net finance receivables to roughly $24.8 billion and earned $6.56 in diluted EPS in FY2025.
For a financial, the right anchor is earnings and book value rather than a single DCF, and on those the picture is consistent: a high single-digit earnings multiple, a dividend yield well above the market, and a return on the equity base that supports the payout and the buyback. The standard valuation methods that depend on operating-margin or EV/EBITDA constructs are less meaningful for a lender, where the income statement runs on net interest and credit provisions; the cleaner read is the price relative to normalized earnings power, and that read says cheap.
The caveat the methods cannot fully capture is that a lender's earnings are only as good as its credit reserves. The valuation looks attractive because trailing earnings are strong, but those earnings are net of a charge-off ratio above 8% and depend on the adequacy of loss provisions through the cycle. If the credit environment deteriorates, reported earnings would fall and the multiple that looks low today would look fairer. The discount in the price is the market's compensation for that cyclicality and for regulatory risk, not evidence that the market has overlooked the value. Paid at this price, an investor is underwriting that OneMain's underwriting holds.
Catalysts
OneMain reported Q1 2026 on May 1, 2026: EPS of $1.95, beating the $1.89 estimate, on pretax income of $296 million and net income of $226 million, with revenue of $1.065 billion that slightly missed forecasts (Quiver Quantitative). The company declared a $1.05 quarterly dividend and repurchased about 1.9 million shares for $105 million during the quarter (StockTitan).
The catalysts to watch are all credit-driven. The Q1 net charge-off ratio of 8.02% and 30-plus-day delinquency of 5.37% are the numbers that move the stock (StockTitan results). Over the next two quarters, watch whether charge-offs and delinquencies stabilize or trend higher, whether receivables growth continues without loosening underwriting, and whether management sustains the dividend and buyback pace. Stable-to-improving credit metrics with continued capital return would support the value case, since every method already sits above the price. Rising losses, a funding-cost increase, or an adverse regulatory action on consumer-lending terms would pressure earnings and justify the discount the market is currently applying.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Consumer and Insurance (C&I) (reported)
- ENVA (Enova International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …we provide services related to a third-party lender's installment consumer loan products by acting as a credit services organization or credit access business on behalf of consumers in accordance with applicable state laws. Services offered under our CSO program include credit-related services such as arranging loans…
- FY2025 10-K: …need for our products in the future. We have developed a series of sophisticated proprietary scoring models to support our various products. We believe that these models are an integral component of our operations and allow us to complete a high volume of customer transactions while actively managing risk and the…
- CACC (CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …and abusive acts and practices, and various other state and federal laws and regulations. These laws and regulations, among other things, require licensing and qualification; limit interest rates, fees, and other charges associated with the Consumer Loans assigned to us; require specified disclosures by Dealers to…
- FY2025 10-K: …Loan") in exchange for the right to service the underlying Consumer Loans. Under the Purchase Program, we buy the Consumer Loans from the Dealers (referred to as a "Purchased Loan") and keep all amounts collected from the consumer. Dealer Loans and Purchased Loans are collectively referred to as "Loans." The…
- LC (LendingClub Corporation)
- FY2025 10-K: …address the core borrowing needs of our members and are underpinned by our scalable technology platform and capabilities. Our primary consumer loan products include the following: • Personal Loans. Unsecured, fixed-rate, and fixed-term consumer loans that may be used for various purposes. We currently offer borrowers…
- FY2025 10-K: …lc:UnsecuredPersonalLoanMember lc:ShortTermPaymentReductionMember lc:ShortTermPaymentReductionModificationMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001409970 lc:UnsecuredPersonalLoanMember us-gaap:ConsumerPortfolioSegmentMember lc:ShortTermPaymentReductionMember srt:MinimumMember lc:ShortTermPaymentReductionModificationMember…
- SLM (SLM Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: …requirements; increased competition from banks and other consumer lenders; the creditworthiness of our customers, or any change related thereto; changes in the general interest rate environment, including the rate relationships among relevant money-market instruments and those of our earning assets versus our funding…
- FY2025 10-K: …refreshed/updated credit scores through the loan's term, existence of a cosigner, loan status, and loan seasoning as the key credit quality indicators because they have the most significant effect on the determination of the adequacy of our allowance for credit losses. Credit scores are an indicator of the…
- BFH (Bread Financial Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …NFL, Raymour & Flanigan, Saks Fifth Avenue, Signet, Ulta and Victoria's Secret. Our partners benefit from our customer insights and analytics, with each of our branded credit card programs tailored to our partner's brand and 3 Tabl e of Contents their unique customers. Our co-brand and private label program…
- FY2025 10-K: …have in the past been, and in the future may be, subject to cyberattacks and we expect such attacks and incidents to continue in varying degrees. For example, we have suffered cyberattacks relating to unauthorized access to customer accounts, and in such instances, we have notified impacted customers and regulators…
- ECPG (ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …rules and guidance on business conduct and systems and controls. The Senior Managers and Certification Regime ("SMCR") is designed to drive accountability and risk ownership within businesses and applies to the majority of colleagues who need to be aware of and adhere to the required standards of conduct. In addition…
- FY2025 10-K: …historical rates of return. Some of our competitors may obtain alternative sources of financing at more favorable rates than those available to us, the proceeds from which may be used to fund expansion and to increase the amount of charged-off receivables they purchase. We face bidding competition in our acquisition…
- NNI (NELNET, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …nni:EducationTechnologyServicesAndPaymentsMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001258602 us-gaap:CorporateNonSegmentMember nni:EducationTechnologyServicesAndPaymentsMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001258602 us-gaap:IntersegmentEliminationMember nni:EducationTechnologyServicesAndPaymentsMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001258602…
- FY2025 10-K: …nni:EducationTechnologyServicesAndPaymentsMember nni:LoanServicingAndSystemsSegmentMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001258602 us-gaap:OperatingSegmentsMember nni:EducationTechnologyServicesAndPaymentsMember nni:EducationTechnologyServicesAndPaymentSegmentMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001258602…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.