← boothcheck

CACC vs OMF stock comparison

CREDIT ACCEPTANCE CORP vs ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC., two Credit Services stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The balance sheets tell opposite funding stories: Credit Acceptance runs debt-free on this page (its subprime auto book funded through off-balance-sheet securitizations), while OneMain carries 6.63 turns, the extreme leverage of a pure personal-installment lender. Both earn superb returns, 30% and 23.6% on equity, deep-subprime underwriting done well. Credit Acceptance nets 19.5% of revenue, OneMain 18.7%, near-matched. OneMain pays a 6.9% dividend against Credit Acceptance's none, and both throw off double-digit free-cash figures. The multiples sit at 15.7 and 9 times. Two high-return subprime lenders, one apparently unlevered by accounting geography, one visibly geared to the hilt; the returns are twins, the leverage optics are not.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

CACC vs OMF: the numbers

MetricCACCOMF
Price$629.29$60.45
Market cap$6.9B$7.1B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+7.8%
P/E15.79.0
P/B4.552.10
P/S2.961.67
EV/EBITDA9810.9387.2
Revenue growth+4.6%+8.8%
Net margin19.5%18.7%
Return on equity29.9%23.6%
Return on assets5.2%3.0%
Dividend yield6.9%
Debt / equity0.006.63
Altman Z (solvency)1.020.48
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 96 / 9
Full CACC report → Full OMF report →
Get boothcheck's read on CACC and OMF, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.