← boothcheck

OMF vs TRU stock comparison

ONEMAIN HOLDINGS, INC. vs TransUnion, two Credit Services stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

OneMain earns 23.6% on equity, TransUnion 14.3%, the leveraged subprime lender out-returning the asset-light credit bureau on capital, though the leverage tells: 6.63 turns against 1.14. On assets the bureau wins, 5.85% against 2.95%, the clean-model read. TransUnion sells the credit data lenders like OneMain buy to price borrowers; OneMain takes the risk. TransUnion trades at 19.5 times earnings against OneMain's 9, and OneMain pays a 6.9% dividend against 0.65%. The market pays the bureau a double multiple for its risk-free recurring revenue while OneMain, taking the actual credit risk, earns the higher equity return and hands back the fatter yield, priced as if a downturn were imminent.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

OMF vs TRU: the numbers

MetricOMFTRU
Price$60.45$70.34
Market cap$7.1B$13.7B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+7.8%+23.5%
P/E9.019.5
P/B2.102.78
P/S1.672.89
EV/EBITDA387.212.9
Revenue growth+8.8%+11.0%
Operating margin19.6%
Net margin18.7%14.9%
Return on equity23.6%14.3%
Return on assets3.0%5.8%
Dividend yield6.9%0.7%
Debt / equity6.631.14
Current ratio1.93
Altman Z (solvency)0.482.07
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 95 / 9
Full OMF report → Full TRU report →
Get boothcheck's read on OMF and TRU, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.