TransUnion (TRU): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $80.02, TransUnion (TRU) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.8 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-11.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/TRU

Headline

FieldValue
TickerTRU
CompanyTransUnion
Sector / IndustryFinancial Services / Credit Services
Current price$80.02/sh
CompositionU.S. Markets - Financial Services 37% / U.S. Markets - Emerging Verticals 29% / U.S. Markets - Consumer Interactive 13% / International - Canada 4% / International - Latin America 3% / International - United Kingdom 6% / International - Africa 2% / International - India 6% / International - Asia Pacific 2%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)9.5%
Operating margin today17.9%
Margin compression (value-band)-8.4pp
Must persist for5.8y
Multiple paid24x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 10% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~1.7 years.

How unusual the bet is: high

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.19σ
cohort percentile (of 17 peers)88
sustained it ~5.8 years at this level27%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.80x5expensive
Earnings3.41x5expensive
Relative0.87x4justifies
Growth0.76x3justifies

Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.0%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=17)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$131.900.61xyesFCF base $0.8B, growth 11% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.0%, 6yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$104.940.76xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 12.3x / 14.3x / 16.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr
Relative ValuationRelative$60.421.32xyesP/E 15.03x (blended: static sector reference 12x + trailing (TTM) 22x), scenarios: 12.4x / 15.0x / 17.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$39.152.04xyesBV/sh $24.44, ROE (TTM) 14.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$48.981.63xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$72.761.10xyesRev $4.7B, growth 11% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.7x / 3.3x / 3.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$126.350.63xyesEPS $3.61, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.63 (Undervalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$23.493.41xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.71B × (1−6%) / WACC 7.0% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$50.321.59xyesBV $24.44 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 14.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$44.551.80xyes√(22.5 × EPS $3.61 × BVPS $24.44) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativeno
FCF YieldEarnings$13.256.04xyesFCF $696.5M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$4.7616.81xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.54B (FCF $0.70B − SBC $0.15B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$116.480.69xyesEPS $3.61 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$8.189.78xyesBV $24.44 × (ROIC 2.4% / WACC 7.0%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$72.901.10xyesRevenue $4.73B × sector P/S 3.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$135.380.59xyesEPS $3.61 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$39.032.05xyesEPS $3.61 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$5.1b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)6.40x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)5.99x
Interest coverage3.5x
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.2%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Watch what management did with the cash this year, because it is doing three things at once and funding all of them internally. Over the trailing year TransUnion returned $401.6 million to shareholders, $308.7 million of buybacks, nearly 44% of net income, plus a dividend just raised to $0.50 annualized at a mere 13.8% payout. Simultaneously it bought growth: consolidating a 94% stake in Trans Union de Mexico and acquiring a mobile messaging business to extend its communications offerings. Trailing free cash flow of $700 million, converting 99% of net income, pays for the entire program, and guidance calls for free cash flow conversion of 90% or better this year with capital spending near 6% of revenue. This is what a data business with real operating leverage looks like when it stops integrating and starts compounding.

The growth is broad, not borrowed. First-quarter revenue rose 13.7% year over year to $1.25 billion, exceeding guidance on revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted earnings, led by U.S. financial services strength plus the Mexico consolidation, and management raised full-year adjusted earnings guidance to $4.68 to $4.75 per share, up 9% to 11%. The moat underneath is the credit file itself, one of three nationwide consumer databases, which the 10-K extends into adjacent products that let customers combine "consumer credit data and any additional third-party data to support a wide range of analytics use cases" without data leaving their environment. And in mortgage, TransUnion is playing offense: cutting VantageScore 4.0, which the bureaus jointly own, to $0.99 per score as it wins approval for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHA loans, projecting more than $900 million of industry savings and positioning to take score economics from FICO.

The international footprint is the part the market rarely prices. Nine reported markets spanning Canada, Latin America, the U.K., Africa, India, and Asia Pacific give TransUnion the emerging-credit-penetration story its U.S.-only peers lack; India, the flagship, grew in local currency on "new business wins and higher commercial volumes" per the 10-K even as currency translation masked it. Meanwhile the price requires no margin heroics at all: the business needs only about an 8.7% long-run operating margin to justify today's quote against the roughly 17.9% it already earns. The bet is on growth persistence, and this quarter's 13.7% is what persistence looks like.

Bear Case

Credit bureaus sell into a lending cycle, and the question a buyer at this price must answer is which part of today's growth is franchise and which part is cycle. First-quarter strength was led by U.S. financial services, the most volume-sensitive slice of the business, riding a consumer-lending upswing. The price leaves no room for the cycle to turn: at about 22x operating income, it embeds roughly 23.5% annual operating growth for five years, a pace only about 32% of comparable fast growers have historically sustained, and the awkward fact beneath the revenue beat is that operating income fell 3.8% year over year in the March quarter. Revenue growing 14% while operating profit shrinks is what investment-heavy expansion looks like; it is not yet what 23% compounding looks like.

The industry's pricing structure is being renegotiated in public. All three bureaus have slashed VantageScore 4.0 to a dollar or less per mortgage score and are giving it away free with FICO purchases, a war aimed at FICO's royalty but one that establishes, in writing, that credit scores can cost $0.99. The government-sponsored entities' move to dual score models and away from mandatory tri-merge files, an evolution the 10-K itself flags in noting that "the Federal Housing Finance Agency and various government sponsored entities continue to evaluate permitting mortgage" scoring changes, could shrink the number of reports pulled per mortgage. Layer on the standing regulatory exposure, with the filing warning of the CFPB's capacity for "additional enforcement actions" and new or reinterpreted regulations, and the toll-booth economics the multiple assumes look less settled than at any point in a decade.

The balance sheet and the earnings print both need asterisks. Debt runs at 1.14x equity and is not declining, the composite solvency gauge sits in its grey zone, and the headline first-quarter earnings surge, net income up 168% while operating income fell, was a below-the-line event, not operating power. Methods anchored to demonstrated earnings power put the price at 2.9x what current profits support, and asset-based reads at 1.9x. At 20.7x trailing GAAP earnings against a 12x sector median, the stock only works on the forward-crediting families' math, which requires the lending cycle, the score war, and the regulators all to cooperate for five years.

Valuation

The bet inside $74.95 (July 10, 2026) is aggressive on growth and modest on everything else. Unwinding the price gives about 22x operating income, embedding roughly 23.5% annual operating-income growth for five years, a pace within what TransUnion has recently delivered in bursts but one that only about 32% of comparable fast growers sustained that long. The margin side asks nothing: about an 8.7% long-run operating margin justifies the price against the roughly 17.9% earned today. This is a duration-of-growth bet, pure and simple, and the framework labels the embedded assumption elevated relative to what fundamentals comfortably support.

The methods split along the forward-versus-demonstrated line. Peer multiples and growth-based cash-flow methods both land about 20% above the price, supporting it; earnings-power methods put the price at 2.9x what trailing profits defend, and asset-based methods at 1.9x. One reconciling clause keeps the earnings bases straight: the trailing GAAP multiple of 20.7x sits on earnings that include a large below-the-line gain in the March quarter, while the company's guided adjusted earnings of $4.68 to $4.75 imply a forward multiple in the mid-teens on that adjusted basis; the two describe different earnings definitions, not a contradiction. The revenue inputs underneath are disclosed cleanly, including the international mix where the 10-K reports India revenue down 1.9% on currency while "local currency revenue increased" on new business wins.

Solvency is manageable rather than pristine: leverage is moderate and well covered, though debt at 1.14x equity is not falling, and the company generated positive free cash flow in all four trailing quarters, $700 million in total, converting 99% of net income. Capital return runs at $401.6 million a year with a 13.8% dividend payout leaving ample retention. The decisive variable is the one the inversion isolates: whether a credit-data franchise riding a lending upswing, a score-pricing war, and two fresh acquisitions can hold operating growth anywhere near what the price already assumes.

Catalysts

The score war has dates attached. VantageScore 4.0 became officially approved for Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and FHA loans as of June 2026, the GSEs published historical credit-score data for FICO 10T and VantageScore 4.0 on July 1, and TransUnion cut its VantageScore 4.0 price to $0.99 per mortgage score, free with a FICO purchase through 2026. Adoption is the number to watch: classic FICO on tri-merge files still dominates closings, so each quarter's evidence of lenders actually switching determines whether the bureaus' pricing offensive converts into score share or merely compresses industry economics. TransUnion projects more than $900 million in potential industry savings from the shift.

The earnings calendar carries raised expectations. First-quarter results beat guidance across revenue, adjusted EBITDA, and adjusted earnings, with revenue up 14% to $1,246 million, adjusted EBITDA up 10% to $438 million at a 35.2% margin, and adjusted earnings per share of $1.18, up 12%. Full-year guidance now calls for adjusted earnings of $4.68 to $4.75, up 9% to 11%, framed by management as conservative amid macro uncertainty. Integration of the two completed acquisitions, the consolidated 94% stake in Trans Union de Mexico and the mobile-messaging business, feeds the international and communications lines through year-end, and the second-quarter print in late July tests whether U.S. financial services volume strength, the quarter's main engine, persisted through the spring lending season.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

U.S. Markets (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q1 2026 earnings, April 2026 · HousingWire, 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call, April 2026 · GuruFocus Q1 2026 coverage, April 2026 · HousingWire and TransUnion newsroom, 2026 · NMP, 2026 · Q1 2026 guidance, April 2026 · HousingWire and 719 Lending, 2026

View the full interactive TRU report on boothcheck