XPO, Inc. (XPO): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $200.19, XPO, Inc. (XPO) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~12.5 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/XPO
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | XPO |
| Company | XPO, Inc. |
| Current price | $200.19/sh |
| Composition | United States 58% / North America (excluding United States) 1% / France 16% / United Kingdom 14% / Europe (excluding France and United Kingdom) 11% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 21.0% |
| Operating margin today | 8.8% |
| Margin expansion (value-band) | +12.2pp |
| Must persist for | 12.5y |
| Multiple paid | 37x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11.7% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.2 years.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~7.5 years; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: high
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.13σ |
| cohort percentile (of 214 peers) | 91 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 14% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 4.61x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 5.48x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.84x | 5 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.28x | 3 | expensive |
Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $54.62 | 3.67x | yes | FCF base $0.4B, growth 7% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.1%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $172.63 | 1.16x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 19.1x / 21.1x / 23.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $126.76 | 1.58x | yes | P/E 31.54x (blended: static sector reference 20x + trailing (TTM) 58x), scenarios: 26.3x / 31.5x / 36.8x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 15.44x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $37.01 | 5.41x | yes | BV/sh $16.63, ROE (TTM) 20.6%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $54.72 | 3.66x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $156.80 | 1.28x | yes | Rev $8.6B, growth 7% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 2.3x / 2.8x / 3.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $53.42 | 3.75x | yes | EPS $3.38, growth 16% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=3.70 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $16.12 | 12.42x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.60B × (1−26%) / WACC 8.1% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $52.48 | 3.81x | yes | BV $16.63 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 20.6% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $35.56 | 5.63x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $3.38 × BVPS $16.63) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $111.53 | 1.79x | yes | EBITDA $1.28B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $3.24 | 61.79x | yes | FCF $362.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 20019.00x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.29B (FCF $0.36B − SBC $0.08B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $109.06 | 1.84x | yes | EPS $3.38 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $7.53 | 26.59x | yes | BV $16.63 × (ROIC 3.7% / WACC 8.1%) (excluded from median) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $108.99 | 1.84x | yes | Revenue $8.57B × sector P/S 1.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $80.12 | 2.50x | yes | EPS $3.38 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 15.8% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 23.7x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $36.54 | 5.48x | yes | EPS $3.38 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
The disclosed units share an operating capital structure; consolidated cash-flow lenses remain coherent and the unit split is explanatory.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| North American LTL | operating | enterprise | $4.8b | — | $20.6b indicative EV subtotal | indicative enterprise value |
| European Transportation | operating | enterprise | $3.3b | — | $2.6b indicative EV subtotal | indicative enterprise value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $3.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 5.80x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 4.31x |
| Interest coverage | 3.6x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 0.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
- XPO is a freight company in the middle of becoming a different one: it runs a large North American less-than-truckload network that moved roughly 16 billion pounds of freight in 2025 in a U.S. LTL market the 10-K sizes at "$53 billion in 2024", while management treats the European business as non-core and intends to sell it to become a pure-play North American carrier.
- The defining risk is leverage stacked on a cyclical business: net debt sits near five times trailing operating income with interest coverage around 3.1 times, and much of the debt is floating-rate, so a prolonged freight downturn squeezes the equity from two directions at once.
- What moves the stock next is the operating ratio: XPO has expanded its LTL margin by 590 basis points since 2022, and continued margin improvement into 2026 against still-soft volumes is the metric the market is paying for.
Bull Case
XPO is best understood not as a mature trucker but as a self-improvement story partway through, and the stage it is at explains why the price looks demanding against trailing numbers. The company is converting a sprawling, acquired LTL network into a higher-margin one through pricing discipline, insourcing of linehaul, and service-center investment, and the proof is in the operating ratio. XPO has expanded its LTL margin by 590 basis points since 2022, the start of what management calls one of the most prolonged freight downturns in history, and improved the adjusted operating ratio by 80 basis points in 2025 alone, 340 basis points over two years. Improving margins through a downturn is the hard version of this; the easy gains come when volumes recover, and those have not arrived yet.
The market position underwrites the runway. The 10-K describes a network that in 2025 "moved approximately 16 billion pounds of freight through our network with a customer-focused organization of truck drivers, service center teams" and sales force, operating in a U.S. LTL market it estimates at "$53 billion in 2024." LTL is a structurally attractive corner of trucking because the network density and the service centers are expensive to replicate, which limits new entrants and gives incumbents pricing power that full-truckload carriers lack. XPO sits among a small group of national LTL operators alongside Old Dominion and Saia, and the company-specific self-help levers mean its margin path is partly within its own control rather than purely hostage to the cycle.
The portfolio simplification is the catalyst on top of the operating story. Management views the European transportation business as a non-core asset to be sold when conditions are right, completing the transition to a pure-play North American LTL carrier. That matters because the European segment has been a drag, posting an operating loss recently even as revenue grew, so a sale would remove a low-return business and let the market value XPO against its high-margin LTL peers rather than as a mixed bag. A cleaner LTL pure-play, still improving its operating ratio, is the entity the bull case is buying, and the Street has moved with that thesis, with BMO Capital raising its target to $240 and Raymond James to $233.
Bear Case
The variable with the most leverage on XPO is one the company does not control: the freight cycle and the interest-rate environment that finances it. The 10-K states the dependency plainly, that business levels are "directly tied to the purchase and pro"duction activity of the broader economy and exposed to "interest rate fluctuations, changes in international trade policies and other U.S. and global economic factors beyond our control." Volumes confirm the pressure: shipments per day fell 1.6% year over year and tonnage per day dropped 4.5%, so the entire 2025 margin improvement came from price and productivity rather than growth. That is impressive execution, but it is also a thinner foundation, because the easier lever, rising volume, is not yet helping, and a deeper downturn would test how much more cost can be cut.
The balance sheet turns that cyclicality into equity risk. Net debt of about $3.4 billion against trailing operating income near $680 million is roughly five times leverage, with interest coverage around 3.1 times, and the 10-K warns the debt load can "limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business" and impair access to additional financing. Worse, a meaningful share of the borrowing carries floating rates: the credit facility, term loan, and receivables securitization are "subject to floating interest rates," so higher-for-longer rates raise interest expense directly while a freight recession would cut the operating income that services it. The two move against each other in exactly the scenario that matters most.
The price compounds the concern. Reading across the valuation families, no family reaches today's price near $200 (June 28, 2026): the asset-based lens sits at a fraction of it, the earnings-power methods far below, and even the forward-growth lens does not get there. The premium the price embeds traces to the European transportation segment held at its self-funding growth ceiling for roughly 23 years, an assumption only about 14% of comparable fast-growers have sustained for even a decade, and one the read itself flags as a small, assumption-sensitive segment. That is a fragile place for the premium to live, especially since management intends to sell that very segment. Strip it out and the price is leaning hard on the North American LTL margin march continuing without the volume tailwind, in a levered business at a rich multiple.
Valuation
The engine locates the priced-in premium in the European transportation segment, where the price implies operating growth held at its self-funding ceiling for roughly 23 years, an assumption only about 14% of comparable fast-growers have sustained for even a decade. The read carries an honest caveat: that segment is small enough that the inversion is sensitive to its inputs, and management has signaled it intends to sell the business. The more useful way to hold the valuation, then, is that the price is paying for the North American LTL franchise to keep grinding its operating ratio lower, with the European premium a fragile and likely-temporary piece of the math rather than the core bet.
Across the valuation families, the price runs well ahead of the static evidence. It sits at several times where the asset-based methods land, far above the earnings-power lens, and above the peer-multiple and forward-growth methods as well, so no family reaches the price. For a company mid-transformation that is the expected pattern: the methods anchor on trailing, cyclically depressed earnings, while the price credits a margin structure the company has demonstrably been building, having added 590 basis points of LTL margin since 2022. The spread is the premium for that self-help continuing and for the eventual cleaner pure-play, not a sign the methods are wrong, but it is a premium that needs the execution to keep delivering.
Solvency is the constraint that turns this from a high multiple into a real risk. Net debt near $3.4 billion is about five times trailing operating income, and interest coverage of roughly 3.1 times is adequate but not comfortable for a cyclical carrier, particularly with floating-rate exposure across the credit facility, term loan, and securitization program. In a freight upturn the leverage amplifies the equity returns; in a downturn it does the reverse, which is why the operating-ratio prints and any progress on selling the European business are the numbers that most directly bear on the downside here.
Catalysts
The fourth-quarter 2025 print showed the self-help story holding against a weak backdrop. Revenue came in at about $2.01 billion, the adjusted operating ratio improved 180 basis points in the quarter, and adjusted operating income rose 14% year over year, even as shipments per day fell 1.6% and tonnage per day dropped 4.5%. The takeaway the market is watching is that margin expansion is coming from pricing and productivity, not volume, because the U.S. freight market remained in what management described as a fragile rebalancing phase with spot rates showing little momentum.
The two structural catalysts ahead are the LTL margin path and the European divestiture. For 2026 management has guided to another full year of substantial margin improvement, and analysts are watching for whether the operating ratio can push toward the high-70s level that the best LTL operators run. Separately, management treats the European transportation segment, which grew revenue 11% to $868 million but posted an operating loss recently, as a non-core asset to be sold, so any announced transaction would reshape the business toward a pure-play North American LTL carrier.
Sentiment has been constructive. The stock carries a consensus buy rating with an average price target in the low-$220s, and recent moves include BMO Capital raising its target to $240 and Raymond James to $233 during the first quarter of 2026. The events most likely to move the thesis from here are the quarterly operating-ratio prints, the first sign of a volume inflection in U.S. freight, and concrete progress on the European sale.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
North American LTL / European Transportation (reported)
- ODFL (OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …technology. In addition, we provide greater geographic coverage than most of our regional competitors. Our diversified mix and scope of regional, inter-regional and national LTL service, combined with our value-added service offerings, enables us to provide our customers with a single source to meet their shipping…
- FY2025 10-K: …with our customers. Generally, our performance obligations begin when we receive a BOL from a customer and are satisfied when we complete the delivery of a shipment and related services. We recognize revenue for our performance obligations under our customer contracts over time, as our customers receive the benefits…
- SAIA (Saia, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …customers a wide range of other value-added services, including brokered truckload and expedited transportation and other logistics services across North America. Founded in 1924, Saia Motor Freight Line, LLC (Saia LTL Freight), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Saia, Inc., is a leading LTL carrier that provides direct…
- FY2025 10-K: …analytics for operational and profitability insights, customer service enhancements, training and streamlined business processes. In 2025, Saia generated revenue of $3.2 billion and operating income of $352.2 million compared to revenue of $3.2 billion and operating income of $482.2 million in 2024. In 2025, the…
- ARCB (ARCBEST CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: Corporation; the LTL segment of Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.; Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.; Saia, Inc.; the U.S. LTL operating segment of TFI International Inc.; and the North American LTL segment of XPO, Inc. Our Asset-Based segment's U-Pack business also competes with self-move businesses that offer…
- FY2025 10-K: …pricing option. This innovative pricing mechanism enables customers to instantly access LTL rates online, by phone, or through application programming interface ("API") technology for shipments within the United States, Canadian cross-border, Mexico, and Puerto Rico. Space-based pricing is utilized for shipments…
- KNX (Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …visibility, continuity, and scale. Significant investment is needed to establish and maintain a network of LTL service centers. The substantial fixed costs and capital expenditures required for LTL carriers make it challenging for new entrants or small operators to effectively compete with established carriers. We…
- FY2025 10-K: …The LTL segment also provides national coverage to our customers by utilizing partner carriers for areas outside of our direct network. • Our Logistics and Intermodal segments provide a multitude of shipping solutions, including additional sources of truckload capacity and alternative transportation modes, by…
- WERN (WERNER ENTERPRISES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: 85 were company-operated and 315 were owned and operated by independent contractors. Our Werner Logistics segment operated an additional 27 drayage company trucks and 170 Final Mile delivery trucks at the end of 2025. We have historically grown organically, and more recently through a combination of organic growth and…
- FY2025 10-K: …see Note 12 - Commitments and Contingencies. (5) Other segment items for each reportable segment primarily includes costs for professional services. During 2025 and 2023, other segment items for the TTS and Logistics segments, respectively, were partially offset by net favorable changes of $ 7.8 million and $ 2.7…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
XPO Q4 2025 results, February 2026 · XPO Q4 2025 segment disclosure · analyst notes via Benzinga, Q1 2026 · XPO Q4 2025 earnings call, February 2026 · analyst notes via Benzinga and stockanalysis.com, 2026