Monster Beverage Corp (MNST): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $46.77, Monster Beverage Corp (MNST) is priced for +5.6% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-03.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/MNST
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | MNST |
| Company | Monster Beverage Corp |
| Current price | $46.77/sh |
| Composition | Monster Energy Drinks 92% / Strategic Brands 6% / Alcohol Brands 2% / Other 0% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 5.9% |
| Operating margin today | 29.2% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -23.3pp |
| Implied growth | 5.6% |
| Multiple paid | 16x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 8.6% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.98σ |
| cohort percentile (of 69 peers) | 35 |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.99x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.96x | 5 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.60x | 2 | justifies |
| Growth | 0.78x | 3 | justifies |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=15)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $75.15 | 0.62x | yes | FCF base $2.4B, growth 20% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.3%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $59.97 | 0.78x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 14.1x / 16.1x / 18.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 22x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 18.0x / 22.0x / 26.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 14x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $23.48 | 1.99x | yes | BV/sh $9.56, ROE (TTM) 22.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $36.68 | 1.28x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $51.64 | 0.91x | yes | Rev $9.2B, growth 20% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 4.1x / 5.0x / 5.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $75.34 | 0.62x | yes | EPS $2.15, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.62 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $19.01 | 2.46x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $2.06B × (1−24%) / WACC 9.3% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $34.05 | 1.37x | yes | BV $9.56 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 22.7% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $21.52 | 2.17x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.15 × BVPS $9.56) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | EBITDA $2.72B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $25.39 | 1.84x | yes | FCF $2097.9M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $23.89 | 1.96x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.96B (FCF $2.10B − SBC $0.14B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $69.45 | 0.67x | yes | EPS $2.15 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $8.12 | 5.76x | yes | BV $9.56 × (ROIC 7.9% / WACC 9.3%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | Revenue $9.22B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $80.72 | 0.58x | yes | EPS $2.15 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $23.27 | 2.01x | yes | EPS $2.15 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monster Energy Drinks | operating | enterprise | $7.7b | $3.0b operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Strategic Brands | operating | enterprise | $468.7m | $240.8m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Alcohol Brands | operating | enterprise | $134.7m | -$127.0m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
| Other | operating | enterprise | $25.0m | $3.4m operating-income | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $3.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -1.57x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -1.19x (net cash) |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -2.0% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Monster Beverage is essentially a pure-play energy-drink company, with the Monster Energy segment making up the bulk of sales, distributed in approximately "158 countries and territories worldwide" largely through the Coca-Cola system, and earning a near-30% operating margin.
- The trajectory is the story: first-quarter net sales rose 26.9% to $2.35 billion, operating income grew 28.1% to $730 million, and international sales jumped 44.9% to reach about 45% of the total.
- The biggest risk is the combination of a premium price and rising competition: the stock trades at the top of its peer multiple range while well-funded rivals like Celsius and Prime contest the category, and input costs are pressuring the gross margin.
Bull Case
The earnings trajectory is the clearest argument, because everything about it is pointing up and accelerating. First-quarter net sales rose 26.9% to $2.35 billion, operating income grew 28.1% to $730 million, and earnings per share climbed 27.6% to $0.58, beating estimates. The growth was led by the core Monster Energy segment, up 27.6%, but the standout was international: sales outside the United States jumped 44.9% to $1.06 billion, now about 45% of the total. When the biggest part of the business grows in the high twenties and the international half grows in the forties, the company is compounding from two engines at once.
The economics behind that growth are exceptional. Monster runs a near-30% operating margin, earns a return on equity above 23%, and converts revenue to cash so efficiently that it holds a net cash position of nearly $2.8 billion with almost no debt. An energy drink is a simple product with an addictive consumption pattern and a strong brand, which is the recipe for high margins and recurring purchases. The company funds its growth entirely from internal cash and still has the firepower to buy back stock, with the board just authorizing an additional $500 million repurchase.
The distribution moat is the durable advantage. Monster's products reach approximately "158 countries and territories worldwide," and the brands move through the Coca-Cola bottling and distribution system, one of the most extensive beverage networks on earth. That partnership is hard for a challenger to replicate: signing up the global Coca-Cola system took Monster years and a strategic relationship, and it gives the company shelf placement and cold-box access in markets where a newer rival has to build distribution from scratch. The bull case is that Monster is a high-margin, net-cash, globally distributed brand still growing in the high twenties with a long international runway, and that the premium multiple reflects a genuine compounder the static valuation lenses cannot frame.
Bear Case
The bear case begins with what the price requires, because the assumption is steep. At $91.35 (as of June 27, 2026) the market is paying about thirty-four times operating income, a multiple at the very top of the beverage peer distribution, and that price embeds roughly 27% annual operating growth sustained for five years. Monster is delivering that pace right now, so the rate is not the leap; the duration is. Only about 32% of comparable fast-growers have held such growth even five years, and the energy-drink category is more contested today than at any point in Monster's history. The price is paying for the rare outcome in a market that is getting harder, not easier.
The competition is named and well-funded. Monster's own 10-K lists the field: it competes with "Red Bull GmbH, KDP, Molson Coors, Constellation Brands, AB InBev, The Boston Beer Company and The Mark Anthony Group," and crucially with newer entrants "such as CELSIUS, PRIME, C4, Alani Nu, GHO"ST. These are not fringe players: Celsius and Prime have taken meaningful shelf space and consumer attention, particularly among younger and health-oriented drinkers, the exact demographic energy drinks chase. The company also faces "competition from new entrants in the energy drink, energy shot, beer and beyond beer categories." A premium multiple assumes Monster keeps winning; the competitive set assumes it has to fight harder for every point of share.
The margin is already showing the strain. First-quarter gross margin fell to 55.0% from 56.5%, pressured by geographic mix, higher aluminum can costs, and elevated freight. As Monster grows internationally, the mix shifts toward lower-margin geographies, and input costs are outside its control. A company priced for 27% growth at peak margins has two ways to disappoint: the growth decelerates as competition bites, or the margin compresses as costs and mix erode it, and a high price magnifies either outcome. The balance sheet is a fortress, net cash and no debt, so this is not a solvency story. It is a valuation-and-competition story: a wonderful business priced as if its best, most contested years are guaranteed to repeat for the rest of the decade.
Valuation
The bet in the price is demanding but, unusually, matched by the current run-rate. At $91.35 the market pays about thirty-four times trailing operating income, which inverts to roughly 27% annual operating growth held for five years. Monster grew operating income 28% last quarter, so the implied rate is close to what it is delivering. The stretch is the duration and the fact that the multiple sits at the very top of the beverage peer distribution, well beyond the upper quartile, with only about 32% of comparable fast-growers having sustained such a pace for five years.
The methods make the shape of the bet explicit: only the growth-based cash-flow lens reaches the price, while asset value, earnings power, and peer multiples all read the stock as richly valued. This is the durability-premium pattern. The static frames capitalize today's profit and cannot price the franchise value of a globally distributed, high-margin brand still compounding in the high twenties, so they land far below the price. The premium is the optionality on continued growth, isolated where an investor can weigh it. The peer-multiple lens is the most stretched, placing fair value far under the price, which is the market's way of saying Monster trades at a premium to every other beverage company precisely because investors believe its growth and margin profile justify it.
Solvency is a strength that takes the downside-survival question off the table. Monster holds nearly $2.8 billion of net cash, carries almost no debt, and generates more than $2 billion of free cash flow a year, enough to fund growth and buy back stock at the same time. The share count is falling about 2% a year through repurchases, which compounds per-share value on top of the operating growth. The decisive question for the valuation is therefore not the balance sheet, which is pristine, but durability against competition: whether Monster can hold its growth rate and its near-30% margin against Celsius, Prime, and the rest of a crowded field long enough to justify a top-of-peer multiple. At this price, the business has to keep executing at its best, and the cost of a slowdown is steep.
Catalysts
Monster Beverage's first-quarter 2026 results were strong across the board and the stock responded. Net sales rose 26.9% to $2.35 billion, beating estimates by roughly 9%, operating income grew 28.1% to $730 million, and EPS climbed 27.6% to $0.58, ahead of the $0.53 forecast. The core Monster Energy segment grew 27.6%, and international sales surged 44.9% to $1.06 billion, now about 45% of the total. The board approved an additional $500 million share-repurchase program alongside the results.
The forward picture balances momentum against two pressures. The growth catalysts are continued international expansion through the Coca-Cola distribution system, new product launches across the energy and beyond-beer categories, and the early alcohol-brand initiatives. The watch items on the other side are margin and competition: first-quarter gross margin slipped to 55.0% from 56.5% on higher aluminum can and freight costs and geographic mix, and the energy-drink category faces intensifying pressure from well-funded entrants like Celsius and Prime. The most important things to track are the trajectory of international growth, whether pricing actions can offset input-cost inflation to stabilize gross margin, and Monster's market-share trend against the newer competitors.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Monster Energy Drinks (reported)
- CELH (CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …with the highest volumes typically occurring during the second and third calendar quarters, aligning with the warmer months in our key markets. However, over the course of a full year, these seasonal fluctuations have not had a material impact on our financial results. Competition Our products compete broadly with…
- FY2025 10-K: …Our products compete with all liquid refreshments and with products of certain competitors that are much larger, some of which have significantly greater financial resources, such as Monster Beverage Corporation, Red Bull GmbH, The Coca-Cola Company, Pepsi, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., Nestlé S.A., BlueTriton Brands,…
- FIZZ (National Beverage Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and our competitive position may vary by market area. Our products compete with many varieties of liquid refreshment, including water products, soft drinks, juices, fruit drinks, energy drinks and sports drinks, as well as powdered drinks, coffees, teas, dairy- based drinks, functional beverages and various other…
- FY2025 10-K: …derived from a variety of apples specific to the taste of the varietal, such as Granny Smith, McIntosh, Honey Crisp, Golden Delicious, Fuji and Pink Lady. Clear Fruit Clear Fruit is a crisp, clear, non-carbonated water beverage enhanced with fruit flavors which is available in 13 delicious flavors, including consumer…
- KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and sold as a packaged beverage to retailers and, ultimately, the end consumer. Beverage concentrates are also manufactured into syrup, which is shipped to fountain customers, such as fast food restaurants, who mix the syrup with water and carbonation to create a finished beverage at the point of sale to consumers.…
- FY2025 10-K: …manufacture and distribution of branded concentrates, syrups, finished beverages, and other consumables, including the sales of our own brands and third-party brands, to third-party bottlers, distributors, and retailers. • The U.S. Coffee segment reflects sales in the U.S. from the manufacture and distribution of…
- COKE (COCA-COLA CONSOLIDATED, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …Neighborhood Market chains. (2) Includes bottle/can sales volume related to the Kroger and Harris Teeter chains. The loss of Walmart Inc. or The Kroger Co. as a customer could have a material adverse effect on the operating and financial results of the Company. No other customer represented greater than 10% of the…
- FY2025 10-K: …Coca‑Cola bottlers, 49 post-mix sales, transportation revenue and equipment maintenance revenue. Post-mix products are dispensed through equipment that mixes fountain syrups with carbonated or still water, enabling fountain retailers to sell finished products to consumers in cups or glasses. The Company's contracts…
- CCEP (COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …volume was down 0.1% versus 2024 on an adjusted comparable basis. This reflected volume decline (down 2.1%) of Coca-Cola Original Taste with growth in the Philippines and PNG, supported by new campaigns, offset by Europe. Coca-Cola Zero Sugar volumes increased versus 2024 (up 5.3%), driven by Europe and double-digit…
- FY2025 20-F: …future growth. Partnerships and people Our strong partnerships with TCCC, Monster Energy Corporation (MEC or Monster) and other brand owners remain central to our success. Together, we are building a portfolio that meets evolving consumer needs. Our success is driven by our people - bringing energy, commitment, and…
- KO (COCA COLA CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …These include companies that, like our Company, compete globally in multiple geographic areas, as well as businesses that are primarily regional or local in operation. Competitive products include numerous nonalcoholic sparkling soft drinks; water products, including flavored and enhanced waters; juices, juice drinks…
- FY2025 10-K: …operations. These operations consist primarily of our consolidated bottling and distribution operations, which are included in our Bottling Investments operating segment. In certain markets, the Company also operates non-bottling finished product operations in which we sell finished beverages to distributors and…
Strategic Brands (reported)
- CELH (CELSIUS HOLDINGS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …base seeking quality and convenience, thereby enhancing our competitive position and financial performance. Our approach is to create a brand experience that is both inclusive and appealing to a wide range of consumers, fostering loyalty and driving sustainable growth. We believe that our multifaceted approach is…
- FY2025 10-K: …by our strategic partnership with Pepsi, which plays a central role in the distribution and commercialization of our products and also in generating a substantial portion of our sales and accounts receivable. While this partnership has been instrumental in expanding our market reach and accelerating revenue growth,…
- FIZZ (National Beverage Corp.)
- FY2025 10-K: …135 years. Our strategy seeks the profitable growth of our products by (i) developing healthier beverages in response to the global shift in consumer buying habits and tailoring our beverage portfolio to the preferences of a diverse mix of ‘crossover consumers' - a growing group desiring a healthier alternative to…
- FY2025 10-K: …distributes products to schools and food-service locations. Our take-home, convenience and food-service operations use vending machines and glass-door coolers as marketing and promotional tools for our brands. We provide vending machines and coolers on a placement or purchase basis to our customers. We believe…
- KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …a significant dispute with any of our key customers, a change in the business condition (financial or otherwise) of any of our key customers, even if unrelated to us, a significant reduction in sales to any key customer, or the loss of any of our key customers may adversely affect our business. Failure to maintain…
- FY2025 10-K: …enjoy high levels of consumer awareness, preference, and loyalty rooted in their rich heritage. This portfolio provides our customers with a wide variety of products to meet consumers' needs and provides us with a platform for growth and profitability. We drive growth in our business through investments in…
- KO (COCA COLA CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …These include companies that, like our Company, compete globally in multiple geographic areas, as well as businesses that are primarily regional or local in operation. Competitive products include numerous nonalcoholic sparkling soft drinks; water products, including flavored and enhanced waters; juices, juice drinks…
- FY2025 10-K: …the concentrate revenue or concentrate sales volume. When we account for an unconsolidated bottling partner as an equity method investment, we eliminate the intercompany profit related to concentrate sales to the extent of our ownership interest, until the equity method investee has sold finished products…
- CCEP (COCA-COLA EUROPACIFIC PARTNERS PLC)
- FY2025 20-F: …We are using real time insights and AI-driven analytics to make faster, smarter decisions; deliver more targeted and segmented execution; and optimise promotions and investments. This also enables us to provide customers with a more consistent service. Across our supply chain, investment in new production lines,…
- FY2025 20-F: 2025 Annual Report and Form 20-F 12 Our strategy continued GREAT BRANDS We make, move and sell the world's most loved drinks. From global icons to local favourites, we have a drink for every taste and occasion. (A) Volume growth on an adjusted comparable basis. +18.8% Energy FY 2025 volume performance (A) +5.3%…
Alcohol Brands (reported)
- SAM (THE BOSTON BEER COMPANY, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: Company anticipates competition will remain strong as existing beverage companies continue adding more SKUs and styles. The potential for growth in the sales of flavored malt beverages, hard seltzers, domestic beers, imported beers and spirits RTDs is expected to increase the competition in the market for Beyond beer…
- FY2025 10-K: …The Company's beverages are sold by the Company's sales force to the same types of customers and drinkers in similar size quantities, at similar price points and through substantially the same channels of distribution. These beverages are manufactured using similar production processes, have comparable alcohol…
- TAP (MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …In the U.S. and Canada, we compete most directly with Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV ("ABI") and Constellation Brands, Inc., but we also compete with imports and other providers of craft beer and flavored malt beverages. In the European countries where we currently operate, our primary competitors are Heineken, Asahi,…
- FY2025 10-K: …over the years becoming an increasingly consolidated global beer market. For many years, the industry operated primarily on local presence with modest international expansion achieved through export, license and partnership arrangements. In contrast, it has now become increasingly complex and competitive as the…
- BUD (Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV)
- FY2025 20-F: …Light, Presidente Regular, Stella Artois, The One Non-Beer : 7UP, 911, Enriquillo, Malta Morena, MontPellier, Pepsi, Red Bull, Red Rock, Vital 911 Ecuador Beer : Budweiser, Club Premium Clásica, Club Premium Platino, Corona, Corona Cero, Modelo Especial, Nuestra Siembra, Nuestra Siembra Inti, Pilsener, Pilsener…
- FY2025 20-F: …by Skol, Huari, Paceña, Quilmes, Stella Artois, Taquiña Non-Beer : 7UP, Guaraná Antárctica, Gatorade, H20H!, Maltin, Mirinda, Pepsi, Pepsi Black, Rockstar, Somos (water) Brazil Beer : Adriática, Antarctica, Antarctica SubZero, Beck's, Bohemia, Bohemia Puro Malte, Brahma, Brahma 0,0%, Brahma Chopp, Brahma Duplo Malte,…
- STZ (CONSTELLATION BRANDS, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …strength. Our beverage alcohol products compete with other alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages for consumer purchases, as well as shelf space in retail stores, restaurant presence, and wholesaler attention. We compete with numerous multinational producers and distributors of beverage alcohol products, some of which…
- FY2025 10-K: …To focus on their respective product categories, build brand equity, and increase sales, we employ full-time, in-house marketing, sales, and customer service functions for our (i) Beer and (ii) Wine and Spirits segments. These functions engage in a range of marketing activities and strategies, including market…
Other (reported)
- KO (COCA COLA CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …These include companies that, like our Company, compete globally in multiple geographic areas, as well as businesses that are primarily regional or local in operation. Competitive products include numerous nonalcoholic sparkling soft drinks; water products, including flavored and enhanced waters; juices, juice drinks…
- FY2025 10-K: …types of statutes and regulations relating to beverage container deposits, recycling, ecotaxes, extended producer responsibility and/or restrictions or bans on the use of certain types of packaging, including certain packaging containing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances ("PFAS"), also apply in various…
- KDP (Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …in escrow in connection with the acquisition of GHOST as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, as well as Kalil Acquisition as of December 31, 2024, with a corresponding holdback liability recorded in Other current liabilities. Refer to Note 4 for additional information. (2) Non-current restricted cash and restricted cash…
- FY2025 10-K: …Sub I LLC and certain other parties thereto 10-K 2/25/2025 10.19 ‡ 10.11 Ghost Lifestyle LLC Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement, dated December 31, 2024 10-K 2/25/2025 10.20 ‡ 10.12 Credit Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2025, among Keurig Dr Pepper Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as…
- MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: AndGovernmentMember 2025-12-31 0001103982 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel12And3Member us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember mdlz:FixedIncomeSecuritiesPooledFundsMember 2025-12-31 0001103982 us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Member us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember mdlz:FixedIncomeSecuritiesPooledFundsMember…
- FY2025 10-K: …2024-01-01 2024-12-31 0001103982 us-gaap:InterestRateContractMember us-gaap:NotDesignatedAsHedgingInstrumentEconomicHedgeMember 2023-01-01 2023-12-31 0001103982 us-gaap:EmbeddedDerivativeFinancialInstrumentsMember us-gaap:NotDesignatedAsHedgingInstrumentEconomicHedgeMember 2025-01-01 2025-12-31 0001103982…
- HSY (HERSHEY CO)
- FY2025 10-K: …us-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMember us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember hsy:DiversifiedcreditMember 2025-12-31 0000047111 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember hsy:DiversifiedcreditMember 2025-12-31 0000047111…
- FY2025 10-K: …us-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMember us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember hsy:RealAssetsFundMember 2025-12-31 0000047111 us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember hsy:RealAssetsFundMember 2025-12-31 0000047111…
- MKC (McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED)
- FY2025 10-K: …us-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember 2024-11-30 0000063754 us-gaap:InterestRateSwapMember mkc:ThreePointFourZeroNotesDueTwoThousandTwentySevenMember us-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember 2025-11-30 0000063754 mkc:USDSOFRMember mkc:ThreePointFourZeroNotesDueTwoThousandTwentySevenMember…
- FY2025 10-K: VMember us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember 2026-01-02 2026-01-02 0000063754 mkc:MccormickDeMexicoSDeCVMember us-gaap:SubsequentEventMember 2026-01-02 0000063754 mkc:A3.25NotesDueNov2025Member us-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember 2025-11-30 0000063754 mkc:A3.25NotesDueNov2025Member us-gaap:NotesPayableOtherPayablesMember…
- CPB (THE CAMPBELL'S COMPANY)
- FY2025 10-K: …0000016732 2025 FY FALSE http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2025#OtherNonoperatingIncomeExpense http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2025#OtherNonoperatingIncomeExpense http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2025#OtherNonoperatingIncomeExpense http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2025#OtherNonoperatingIncomeExpense…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-08-03 0000016732 us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesMember 2025-08-03 0000016732 us-gaap:OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesMember 2024-07-28 0000016732 us-gaap:EarliestTaxYearMember 2024-07-29 2025-08-03 0000016732 us-gaap:LatestTaxYearMember 2024-07-29 2025-08-03 0000016732 us-gaap:StateAndLocalJurisdictionMember…
- GIS (GENERAL MILLS INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …• Cedar Rapids, Iowa • Albuquerque, New Mexico • Milwaukee, Wisconsin • Irapuato, Mexico • Buffalo, New York International • Rooty Hill, Australia • Sanhe, China • Nashik, India • Campo Novo do Pareceis, Brazil • Shanghai, China • San Adrian, Spain • Pouso Alegre, Brazil • Arras, France • Guangzhou, China • Labatut,…
- FY2025 10-K: …2025-05-25 0000040704 us-gaap:OtherPostretirementBenefitPlansDefinedBenefitMember us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanDebtSecurityMember 2025-05-25 0000040704 us-gaap:OtherPostretirementBenefitPlansDefinedBenefitMember us-gaap:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsMember 2025-05-25 0000040704…
- INGR (INGREDION INCORPORATED)
- FY2025 10-K: …of common stock were excluded from the calculation of the weighted average number of shares outstanding for diluted EPS in 2025, 2024 and 2023 because their effects were anti-dilutive. 12. Segment and Geographical Information Effective January 1, 2024, we changed our reportable segments to align them with changes in…
- FY2025 10-K: …us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember ingr:DefinedBenefitPlanCashAndCashEquivalentsAndShortTermInvestmentsMember 2025-12-31 0001046257 us-gaap:ForeignPlanMember us-gaap:FairValueMeasuredAtNetAssetValuePerShareMember us-gaap:PensionPlansDefinedBenefitMember…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Monster Q1 2026 results, 2026 · Monster FY2025 10-K