BURLINGTON STORES, INC. (BURL): what the price requires
At today's price, BURLINGTON STORES, INC. (BURL) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~9.6 years. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/BURL
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | BURL |
| Company | BURLINGTON STORES, INC. |
| Current price | $327.26/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin needed | 4.4% |
| Operating margin today | 5.0% |
| Margin compression implied | -0.6pp |
| Must persist for | 9.6y |
| Multiple paid | 48x operating income |
The operating-margin requirement is derived from the framework's value band at year 12, a separately labeled basis from the headline growth/duration solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 9.3% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 25% self-funding ceiling; each 1pp moves the implied horizon ~2.1 years.
How unusual the bet is: high
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +2.00σ |
| cohort percentile (of 69 peers) | 97 |
| sustained it ~9.6 years at this level | 15% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.56x | 4 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.08x | 2 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.44x | 4 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.12x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $152.50 | 2.15x | yes | FCF base $0.4B, growth 11% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.3%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $354.32 | 0.92x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 58.6x / 60.6x / 62.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $191.29 | 1.71x | yes | P/E 25.49x (blended: static sector reference 22x + trailing (TTM) 34x), scenarios: 21.1x / 25.5x / 29.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 27.98x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $105.18 | 3.11x | yes | BV/sh $28.63, ROE (TTM) 34.0%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $213.67 | 1.53x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $291.71 | 1.12x | yes | Rev $11.9B, growth 11% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.5x / 1.8x / 2.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $188.07 | 1.74x | yes | EPS $9.72, growth 19% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.74 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | $163.26 | 2.00x | yes | BV $28.63 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 34.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $79.13 | 4.14x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $9.72 × BVPS $28.63) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $14.43 | 22.68x | yes | EBITDA $0.43B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x (excluded from median) |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 32726.00x | yes | FCF $382.9M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity (excluded from median) |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $0.01 | 32726.00x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $0.26B (FCF $0.38B − SBC $0.12B) capitalized at Kₑ (excluded from median) |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $313.63 | 1.04x | yes | EPS $9.72 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $371.64 | 0.88x | yes | Revenue $11.92B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $282.11 | 1.16x | yes | EPS $9.72 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 19.3% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 29.0x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $105.08 | 3.11x | yes | EPS $9.72 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $1.3b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 2.99x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 2.41x |
| Interest coverage | 7.8x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.0% |
| Burning cash | no |
Bullet Takeaways
At about $337, Burlington trades near 49 times company-wide operating income. Inverted, the price asks the chain to hold growth near its self-funding ceiling for roughly a decade, a bet that the model flags as high, with the stock's own multiple stretched well above its history. Only the growth-DCF method reaches the price; the asset, earnings-power, and peer-multiple methods all land below it.
The recent results are strong. First-quarter fiscal 2026 net sales rose 14%, comparable store sales rose 6%, adjusted EPS climbed 26%, and gross margin expanded to 44.1%, prompting management to raise full-year guidance. The off-price model is executing well.
Capital is going into stores and buybacks. Burlington is opening roughly 115 net new stores in 2026, funds that growth internally, carries modest leverage at about 2.4 times operating income with interest coverage above 15 times, and is shrinking its share count. The thin operating margin near 4.5% is both the lever and the vulnerability.
Bull Case
Look at how Burlington deploys its cash, because the capital plan is the clearest expression of where management sees value. The company reinvests almost all of its free cash flow into opening new stores, guiding to roughly 135 gross and 115 net new locations in 2026, ahead of prior plans, while funding that build internally and keeping leverage modest at about 2.4 times operating income with interest coverage above 15 times. On top of the store growth, it shrinks the share count through buybacks, down about 1% a year. A retailer that can open new stores at attractive returns and still buy back stock is signaling that the unit economics work: each new Burlington store is a high-return reinvestment opportunity, and the company would rather build more of them than sit on cash.
The off-price model is the durable advantage behind those returns. Burlington buys branded merchandise opportunistically and sells it at a discount, which gives shoppers a treasure-hunt value proposition that holds up in good times and better in bad. The 10-K describes a core customer who is "25-49 years old, is more ethnically diverse than the general population," a large and value-oriented demographic (FY2025 10-K, accession 0000950170-25-040472). When household budgets tighten, off-price retailers like Burlington, TJX, and Ross gain share as consumers trade down from full-price retail, and when budgets are flush, the value still appeals. That counter-cyclical demand is why the model has compounded for years and why the growth-DCF method is the one that reaches the price.
The execution is delivering right now. First-quarter fiscal 2026 net sales rose 14%, comparable store sales rose 6% ahead of plan, adjusted EPS jumped 26%, and gross margin expanded 30 basis points to 44.1% on better merchandise margins and lower freight. The Burlington 2.0 elevation strategy, upgrading the in-store experience and merchandising mix, is lifting both traffic and ticket, and management raised full-year guidance to 9% to 11% sales growth and $11.45 to $11.80 in adjusted EPS. With a 34% return on equity, a long runway of new-store openings, and analysts at JPMorgan and UBS raising targets to $374 and $435, the bull case is that Burlington is a proven off-price compounder whose store-growth runway and margin-expansion program justify the premium the static frames cannot price.
Bear Case
The cycle question is whether these are peak results being priced as a permanent run rate. Burlington just posted a 6% comparable store sales gain, well above the 2% to 4% it guides for the full year, and a 26% jump in adjusted EPS. Those are excellent numbers, but off-price retail is cyclical, and the strongest comps tend to come when the consumer is healthy and inventory availability is favorable. A 6% comp is hard to repeat, and the company's own full-year guidance acknowledges a slowdown to the low-to-mid single digits. At about 49 times operating income, the price assumes near-ceiling growth sustained for roughly a decade, and history says only about 14% of comparable fast-growers held that pace that long. Extrapolating a strong quarter into a ten-year compounding assumption is the classic late-cycle valuation error.
The thin margin is the structural amplifier of any consumer wobble. Burlington runs an operating margin near 4.5%, so small changes in comps, freight, or markdowns swing the profit sharply. The 10-K ties demand directly to the macro backdrop, naming "prevailing global economic conditions, the costs of basic necessities and other goods, levels of employment, salaries and wage rates" as the drivers of spending, and flags exposure to "the closing of such destination retailers or anchor stores, or by a reduction in traffic" since many Burlington stores sit in centers anchored by other retailers (FY2025 10-K, accession 0000950170-25-040472). A recession that pressures the value-oriented core customer, a wave of co-tenant closures, or a markdown cycle from misjudged inventory would each hit the thin margin hard.
Then there is tariffs, cost inflation, and the valuation gap. Burlington sources a large share of imported branded merchandise, so higher tariffs raise its cost of goods at the same time wage and fuel inflation raise its operating costs, and an off-price retailer cannot always pass those through without dulling the value proposition that draws its customers. The store-growth strategy also carries its own risk: the 10-K cautions that opening stores in existing markets "may experience reduced net sales volumes in existing stores in those markets," a cannibalization drag as the footprint densifies. Meanwhile every valuation method except the growth-DCF lands below the price, the relative read near $194, the asset and earnings-power reads lower still, with a blended read near $191, roughly half the quote. The bet is that Burlington sustains exceptional execution for a decade through whatever the consumer cycle, tariffs, and competition throw at it. At 49 times operating income on a 4.5% margin, there is almost no cushion if any of that goes the wrong way.
Valuation
Burlington is priced as a long-duration growth compounder, and the multiple is steep. At about $337 (June 27, 2026) the price equals roughly 49 times company-wide operating income, which inverts into an assumption that operating growth holds near the self-funding ceiling for about ten years. The high multiple is partly a function of the thin operating margin near 4.5%: a healthy dollar profit on $12 billion of revenue still translates into a large multiple of operating income. The model flags the implied bet as high, and the stock's own valuation sits well above its historical range, with history suggesting only about 14% of comparable fast-growers sustained this pace for a decade.
The method families split decisively. Only the growth-DCF family reaches the price, with a discounted-future-market-cap read near $300 and an exit-multiple DCF near $363, both crediting years of double-digit compounding. Every other family lands below: the relative-valuation read near $194 on a blended sector and trailing multiple, the asset and excess-return reads in the $105 to $214 range against a book value of about $28.63 per share and a 34% return on equity, and the normalized earnings-power value effectively zero because cycle-average operating income is thin. The blended read across applicable methods is near $191, roughly 57% of the current price. The signal is clear: the price rests on durable high growth and is contradicted by every static frame.
The honest conclusion: this is a durability premium on a high-quality but cyclical, thin-margin retailer, not a value entry. The case works if Burlington keeps opening high-return stores, holds comps in the guided low-to-mid single digits, and continues the margin expansion of the 2.0 program, in which case the growth methods are right and the premium is earned. It does not work if the consumer weakens, tariffs and cost inflation compress the thin margin, or the strong recent comps prove to be a cyclical peak rather than a run rate. At 49 times operating income with a ten-year implied horizon, the price already assumes the favorable decade, and the static methods that sit near half the price are the measure of how little supports it if execution slips.
Catalysts
The latest catalyst was a first-quarter fiscal 2026 beat and guidance raise. Net sales rose 14% to $2.85 billion, comparable store sales rose 6% ahead of internal expectations, adjusted EPS climbed 26% to $2.10, and gross margin expanded 30 basis points to 44.1% on better merchandise margins and lower freight. (tickeron, Motley Fool) Management raised full-year guidance to 9% to 11% sales growth, 2% to 4% comparable store sales growth, and adjusted EPS of $11.45 to $11.80.
Store growth and the elevation strategy are the structural catalysts. Burlington plans roughly 135 gross and 115 net new stores in 2026, ahead of prior guidance, and is rolling out its Burlington 2.0 and Store Experience 2.0 initiatives to upgrade merchandising, layout, and the in-store experience to lift traffic and ticket. (Simply Wall St) The off-price model also tends to gain share when consumers trade down, a tailwind in an uncertain spending environment.
Analyst sentiment is bullish, with a Buy consensus and recent target increases including JPMorgan to $374 at Overweight and UBS to $435 citing confidence in the Burlington 2.0 plan. (public.com) The things to watch over the coming quarters: whether comparable store sales hold up as they lap the strong recent base, the pace and productivity of new-store openings, the impact of tariffs on imported merchandise costs and of wage and fuel inflation on the thin operating margin, and whether the 2.0 elevation program keeps expanding gross margin.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- M (Macy's, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …' s ever-changing environment. We conduct our retail merchandising business under highly competitive conditions. Although Macy's, Inc. is one of the nation's largest retailers, we have numerous and varied competitors at the national and local levels and digital competitors at the global level, including department…
- FY2025 10-K: …It is difficult to successfully predict the products and services our customers will demand. As customers expect a more personalized experience, our ability to collect, use and protect relevant customer data is important to our ability to effectively meet their expectations, but is subject to the impact of…
- KSS (KOHL'S CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …to excel in their jobs and serve our customers. We are committed to the highest integrity standards and maintain a Code of Ethics to guide ethical decision-making for associates. As a company of integrity, we expect our associates to be honest and accountable. Our ethics training, which we require all associates to…
- FY2025 10-K: …of 50 basis points to last year. The increase in gross margin was driven by lower freight costs and strong inventory management as our receipts were down 5% to last year as we continue to benefit from operating with greater flexibility. This was partially offset by elevated shrink levels. Selling, General, and…
- DDS (DILLARD’S, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and Internet and mail-order retailers. Although we are a large regional department store, some of our competitors are larger than us with greater financial resources and, as a result, may be able to devote greater resources to sourcing, promoting and selling their products. Additionally, we compete in certain markets…
- FY2025 10-K: …of net sales 26.7 % 25.4 % 24.4 % Cash flow provided by operations (in millions) $ 714.1 $ 883.6 $ 948.4 Total retail store count at end of period 272 273 277 Retail sales per square foot $ 137 $ 143 $ 146 Retail stores sales trend (2) % * (5) % ** 5 % Comparable retail store sales…
- TGT (TARGET CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …and Analysis of Financial Condition for 2023, as compared to 2022, is included in Part II, Item 7, MD&A to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2024 . Net Sales Net Sales includes Merchandise Sales and revenues from other sources, most notably advertising revenue and credit card…
- FY2025 10-K: …of macroeconomic, competitive, and consumer behavioral factors, as well as sales mix, and transfer of sales to new stores makes further analysis of sales metrics infeasible. TD Bank Group offers credit to qualified guests through Target-branded credit cards: the Target Credit Card and the Target MasterCard Credit…
- DG (DOLLAR GENERAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …service offerings, product sourcing and supply chain capacity, in-stock consistency, customer service, ease of shopping experience (including but not limited to various modes of shopping, including online alternatives and delivery), promotional activity, employees, and market share. We compete with discount stores…
- FY2025 10-K: …operate stores in many of the areas where we operate, and many of them engage in extensive advertising and marketing efforts. Our direct competitors include Family Dollar, Dollar Tree, and various local, independent operators, as well as Walmart, Target, Kroger, Aldi, Costco, Sams Club, BJ's Wholesale Club,…
- PSMT (PriceSmart, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …as currency rate changes, changes in tax rates or in the methods used to calculate or collect taxes on our sales or income and other factors that can increase costs. We might not be able to adjust prices, operate more efficiently or increase our comparable store net sales in the future to a great enough extent to…
- FY2025 10-K: …retailers, including Walmart Inc. in Central America and Grupo Éxito in Colombia and Cencosud in South America. We have noted that certain retailers are making investments in upgrading their locations or opening new stores which may result in increased competition. Further, it is possible that other warehouse club…
- DLTR (DOLLAR TREE, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …operations and financial condition of our continuing operations. Overview We are a leading operator of more than 8,800 retail discount stores, as of February 1, 2025, offering merchandise predominantly at the opening price point of $1.25, with additional offerings at higher price points. Our net sales are derived…
- FY2025 10-K: …our prices, but our ability to do so may be limited with the result that we could see lower sales or reduced profitability. We expect competition to increase in the future. There are no significant economic barriers for others to enter our retail sector. We compete with discount stores and many other retailers,…
- OLLI (Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and other improvements in their competitive positions, as well as result in the provision of a wider variety of merchandise at competitive prices by these consolidated companies, which could have a material adverse effect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. We cannot guarantee that we will…
- FY2025 10-K: …strategy, we expect a significant portion of our sales growth will be attributable to non-comparable store sales. Accordingly, comparable store sales are only one measure we use to assess the success of our growth strategy. Gross Profit and Gross Margin Gross profit is equal to our net sales less our cost of sales.…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.