← boothcheck

MUFG vs WFC stock comparison

MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP INC vs WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN, two Banks—Regional stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Bank leverage lines mean little, so let returns carry it: Wells Fargo earns 12% on equity and 0.98% on assets; Mitsubishi UFJ earns 6.6% and 0.31%, a third the asset productivity, priced at more than double the multiple, 28 times against 13. The Japanese premium is entirely the rate-normalization story; the American discount is entirely the assumption that a fixed Wells has nothing left to prove or improve. Net margins, 25.5% against 11.7%. Wells pays 2%, MUFG 1.5%. Rarely is the strongest quantitative case on the cheapest page this legible: the pair prices narrative at a 15-turn premium to arithmetic, in an industry where arithmetic eventually collects.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

MUFG vs WFC: the numbers

MetricMUFGWFC
Price$20.16$83.88
Market cap$235.0B$261.5B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageGrowthMature
P/E27.913.0
P/B1.831.45
P/S3.253.08
EV/EBITDA20.1
Revenue growth+22.9%+4.2%
Operating margin14.4%
Net margin11.7%25.5%
Return on equity6.6%12.0%
Return on assets0.3%1.0%
Dividend yield1.5%2.0%
Debt / equity0.001.20
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 97 / 9
Full MUFG report → Full WFC report →
Get boothcheck's read on MUFG and WFC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.