← boothcheck

BAC vs WFC stock comparison

BofA Finance LLC vs WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN, two Banks—Regional stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

For banks the balance-sheet page is mostly ritual, deposits are not debt and coverage math does not apply, so the honest comparison starts at returns: Wells Fargo earns 12% on equity and 0.98% on assets against Bank of America's 10.6% and 0.91%, a modest but consistent edge for the smaller franchise. Net margins sit close, 25.5% and 27.6%. The market prices the gap at a turn and a half, 13 times earnings for Wells against 14.3 for BofA, with dividends of 2% and 1.9% nearly matched. Two of the four money-center giants, priced almost interchangeably; the return tables give Wells the nod, the deposit franchise gives BofA its premium, and the pair mostly measures how little daylight American mega-banking allows.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

BAC vs WFC: the numbers

MetricBACWFC
Price$59.64$87.08
Market cap$442.4B$271.5B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageMatureMature
P/E14.813.5
P/B1.471.51
P/S3.843.19
EV/EBITDA1270.0
Revenue growth+6.4%+4.2%
Net margin27.6%25.5%
Return on equity10.6%12.0%
Return on assets0.9%1.0%
Dividend yield1.8%1.9%
Debt / equity1.081.20
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 97 / 9
Full BAC report → Full WFC report →
Get boothcheck's read on BAC and WFC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.