← boothcheck

LULU vs UA stock comparison

lululemon athletica inc. vs UNDER ARMOUR, INC., two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Lululemon and Under Armour both sell athletic apparel, and there the resemblance stops. Lululemon earns 30.25% on equity and a 13.03% net margin, and trades at a cheap 9.51 times earnings with no debt. Under Armour is loss-making through a turnaround, a return on equity near -35%, no earnings to price, and 1.27 in debt. Lululemon yields 9.43% in free cash flow; Under Armour burns cash at -6.31%. At 2.81 times book Lululemon is priced for proven profitability that the market currently undervalues; at 1.82 times Under Armour is priced for a recovery that may or may not come.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

LULU vs UA: the numbers

MetricLULUUA
Price$119.23$6.62
Market cap$13.8B$2.8B
SectorApparelApparel
StageMatureMature
P/E9.7
P/B2.851.99
P/S1.230.57
EV/EBITDA5.446.4
Revenue growth+4.7%-3.7%
Gross margin54.2%42.0%
Operating margin11.2%-2.9%
Net margin13.0%-10.0%
Return on equity30.3%-35.0%
Return on assets17.1%-11.2%
Return on invested capital28.9%-0.4%
FCF yield9.3%-5.8%
Debt / equity0.001.27
Current ratio2.231.62
Altman Z (solvency)4.672.01
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 91 / 9
Full LULU report → Full UA report →
Get boothcheck's read on LULU and UA, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.