← boothcheck

COLM vs UA stock comparison

COLUMBIA SPORTSWEAR COMPANY vs UNDER ARMOUR, INC., two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Under Armour is bleeding through a turnaround, no positive earnings to price and a return on equity near -35%, so its stock at 1.82 times book is a recovery bet. Columbia Sportswear is quietly profitable by contrast, a 4.98% net margin and 10.7% on equity, and it trades at 20.54 times earnings and 2.15 times book. Columbia yields a healthy 5.13% in free cash flow while Under Armour burns cash at -6.31%. Columbia holds no debt; Under Armour carries 1.27. The outdoor maker pays a 1.86% dividend from real profits; the athletic name asks investors to wait for profits to return.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

COLM vs UA: the numbers

MetricCOLMUA
Price$62.99$6.62
Market cap$3.3B$2.8B
SectorApparelApparel
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)-2.9%
P/E20.1
P/B2.101.99
P/S0.980.57
EV/EBITDA11.646.4
Revenue growth+1.3%-3.7%
Gross margin50.7%42.0%
Operating margin5.4%-2.9%
Net margin5.0%-10.0%
Return on equity10.7%-35.0%
Return on assets6.6%-11.2%
Return on invested capital9.3%-0.4%
FCF yield5.3%-5.8%
Dividend yield1.9%
Debt / equity0.001.27
Current ratio3.071.62
Altman Z (solvency)4.822.01
Piotroski F (quality)4 / 91 / 9
Full COLM report → Full UA report →
Get boothcheck's read on COLM and UA, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.