← boothcheck

LULU vs NKE stock comparison

lululemon athletica inc. vs NIKE, Inc.. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Lululemon keeps 54 cents of every sales dollar as gross profit to Nike's 40, and that 14-point cushion is the cleanest line between them. It carries down: Lululemon nets 13% against Nike's 4.8%, earns 30% on equity to 16%, and does it with no debt and a 2.2 current ratio. The pricing inverts what the margins suggest, Lululemon at under 10 times earnings and Nike near 30, while Nike pays a 3.5% dividend and Lululemon pays none. The thinner-margin, slower brand is the one the market is willing to pay up for, betting Nike's scale reasserts itself.

Comparison updated 2026-06-15.

LULU vs NKE: the numbers

MetricLULUNKE
Price$119.23$44.39
Market cap$13.8B$65.8B
SectorApparelFootwear
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+17.9%
P/E9.729.4
P/B2.854.67
P/S1.231.41
EV/EBITDA5.489.2
Revenue growth+4.7%-2.5%
Gross margin54.2%40.2%
Operating margin11.2%
Net margin13.0%4.8%
Return on equity30.3%16.0%
Return on assets17.1%6.1%
Return on invested capital28.9%
FCF yield9.3%1.6%
Dividend yield3.5%
Debt / equity0.000.57
Current ratio2.232.14
Altman Z (solvency)4.677.63
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 94 / 9
Full LULU report → Full NKE report →
Get boothcheck's read on LULU and NKE, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.