← boothcheck

LI vs RIVN stock comparison

Li Auto Inc. vs Rivian Automotive, Inc. / DE, two Auto Manufacturers stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

One EV maker has reached thin profit and the other still burns: Li Auto nets a positive 1.01% while Rivian posts a negative 72.8%, the Chinese maker having crossed into the black as the US startup funds its way toward scale. Li earns 1.56% on equity, Rivian negative 90.8%; Li carries 0.13 turns of debt, Rivian 1 turn and a negative 15.6% free-cash figure. Li trades at 150.6 times its slim earnings, Rivian at no multiple at all. The pair prices two EV challengers at different stages of the same climb; Li has crossed into profitability and is priced for its volume growth, Rivian is years behind and priced on survival-plus-scale, and the market ranks them by how close each sits to sustainable profit.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

LI vs RIVN: the numbers

MetricLIRIVN
Price$12.05$15.64
Market cap$25.8B$19.5B
SectorAuto ManufacturersAuto Manufacturers
StageGrowthGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+7.4%
P/E150.6
P/B2.474.41
P/S1.613.53
EV/EBITDA32.4
Revenue growth+53.8%+19.1%
Gross margin18.7%8.6%
Operating margin-0.5%-63.8%
Net margin1.0%-72.8%
Return on equity1.6%-90.8%
Return on assets0.7%-28.3%
Return on invested capital-0.6%-33.9%
FCF yield-7.1%-15.6%
Debt / equity0.131.00
Current ratio1.812.10
Altman Z (solvency)2.56-1.00
Piotroski F (quality)2 / 91 / 9
Full LI report → Full RIVN report →
Get boothcheck's read on LI and RIVN, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.