← boothcheck

GM vs LI stock comparison

GENERAL MOTORS COMPANY vs Li Auto Inc., two Auto Manufacturers stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

GM runs debt-free (ex-finance) as a US legacy automaker eking out a thin 1.38% net margin; Li Auto carries 0.13 turns as a young Chinese EV maker netting a similarly thin 1.01%, a rare case where the century-old giant and the upstart earn nearly identical razor margins. GM trades at 28.5 times earnings, Li at 150.6, the market pricing Li's growth at five times GM's multiple. GM yields a prodigious 20.4% in free cash (buyback-and-finance-flavored) and pays a 0.73% dividend; Li yields negative 7.1%, still investing. The pair prices a mass-market incumbent against a Chinese EV challenger; both earn thin margins, but GM converts far more to cash while Li spends toward scale, and the market pays up for the growth.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

GM vs LI: the numbers

MetricGMLI
Price$78.13$12.05
Market cap$72.3B$25.8B
SectorAuto ManufacturersAuto Manufacturers
StageMatureGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+10.7%
P/E28.5150.6
P/B1.122.47
P/S0.391.61
EV/EBITDA3.632.4
Revenue growth-2.0%+53.8%
Gross margin18.7%
Operating margin6.7%-0.5%
Net margin1.4%1.0%
Return on equity3.9%1.6%
Return on assets0.9%0.7%
Return on invested capital3.1%-0.6%
FCF yield20.4%-7.1%
Dividend yield0.7%
Debt / equity0.000.13
Current ratio1.151.81
Altman Z (solvency)1.222.56
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 92 / 9
Full GM report → Full LI report →
Get boothcheck's read on GM and LI, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.