← boothcheck

GLNG vs ZIM stock comparison

Golar LNG Limited vs ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD., two Marine Shipping stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Floating LNG against container liner shipping, both capital-heavy, both tied to global trade in different ways. ZIM earns a slimmer net margin, 6.97% against Golar's 16.69%, but it prices below its own equity at 0.77 times book while Golar trades at 2.64 times. The balance sheets split them: ZIM carries no debt, Golar a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.48. Golar's return on equity is a low 3.18% during its buildout. ZIM's free-cash-flow yield of 18.64% signals a cash-rich but cyclical container name priced for a downturn; Golar is the levered floating-gas bet still waiting on its returns. Very different risks under the same maritime label.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

GLNG vs ZIM: the numbers

MetricGLNGZIM
Price$51.23$23.98
Market cap$5.6B$2.9B
SectorMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
StageGrowthMature
P/E6.0
P/B2.710.72
P/S14.250.42
EV/EBITDA50.50.8
Revenue growth+13.2%+0.8%
Gross margin19.1%
Operating margin25.3%14.7%
Net margin16.7%7.0%
Return on equity3.2%12.0%
Return on assets1.2%4.4%
Return on invested capital1.9%18.4%
FCF yield79.6%
Debt / equity1.480.00
Current ratio2.551.23
Altman Z (solvency)1.321.48
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 94 / 9
Full GLNG report → Full ZIM report →
Get boothcheck's read on GLNG and ZIM, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.