← boothcheck

FRO vs ZIM stock comparison

Frontline plc vs ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD., two Marine Shipping stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Crude tankers versus container liners, two shipping cycles that rarely peak together. Frontline runs the higher net margin, 19.23% against ZIM's 6.97%, and looks like it's in a healthier part of its cycle. ZIM, by contrast, trades below the value of its own equity, 0.77 times book and 6.43 times earnings, cheaper than Frontline's 3.15 times book and 20.89 times earnings. On cash, ZIM's free-cash-flow yield of 18.64% tops Frontline's 8.47%, but container earnings are the more violent of the two. Frontline is the mid-cycle tanker returning cash steadily; ZIM is the beaten-down box carrier priced for a freight trough. Both cyclical, on separate clocks.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

FRO vs ZIM: the numbers

MetricFROZIM
Price$38.11$23.98
Market cap$8.5B$2.9B
SectorMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
StageGrowthMature
P/E22.46.0
P/B3.380.72
P/S4.300.42
EV/EBITDA13.80.8
Revenue growth+31.9%+0.8%
Gross margin19.1%
Operating margin30.4%14.7%
Net margin19.2%7.0%
Return on equity15.1%12.0%
Return on assets6.6%4.4%
Return on invested capital23.5%18.4%
FCF yield7.9%79.6%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.431.23
Altman Z (solvency)2.471.48
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 94 / 9
Full FRO report → Full ZIM report →
Get boothcheck's read on FRO and ZIM, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.