FIGS, Inc. vs lululemon athletica inc., two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where FIGS and LULU diverge most: on revenue growth, FIGS reads +24.5% and LULU reads +1.9%; on ev/ebitda, FIGS reads 37.7 and LULU reads 3.4. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What LULU's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | FIGS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $15.77 | $94.52 |
| Market cap | $3.1B | $10.0B |
| Sector | Apparel | Apparel |
| Stage | Growth | Mature |
| P/E | 47.8 | 7.8 |
| P/B | 6.96 | 2.08 |
| P/S | 4.33 | 0.90 |
| EV/EBITDA | 37.7 | 3.4 |
| Revenue growth | +24.5% | +1.9% |
| Gross margin | 75.2% | 60.5% |
| Operating margin | 17.9% | 18.8% |
| Net margin | 8.7% | 12.8% |
| Return on equity | 14.0% | 29.6% |
| Return on assets | 10.6% | 16.7% |
| Return on invested capital | 11.9% | 29.1% |
| FCF yield | 3.2% | 13.6% |
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 4.96 | 2.19 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 8.48 | 4.13 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 8 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.