FIGS, Inc. vs lululemon athletica inc., two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where FIGS and LULU diverge most: on ev/ebitda, FIGS reads 38.0 and LULU reads 5.0; on fcf yield, FIGS reads 1.9% and LULU reads 9.9%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What LULU's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | FIGS | LULU |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $10.71 | $118.89 |
| Market cap | $2.1B | $12.9B |
| Sector | Apparel | Apparel |
| Stage | Growth | Mature |
| P/E | 48.7 | 9.6 |
| P/B | 4.88 | 2.67 |
| P/S | 3.15 | 1.15 |
| EV/EBITDA | 38.0 | 5.0 |
| Revenue growth | +18.8% | +4.7% |
| Gross margin | 67.7% | 54.2% |
| Operating margin | 2.8% | 11.2% |
| Net margin | 6.1% | 13.0% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 30.3% |
| Return on assets | 7.2% | 17.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.7% | 28.9% |
| FCF yield | 1.9% | 9.9% |
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 5.39 | 2.23 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 8.22 | 4.53 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 5 / 9 | 6 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.