← boothcheck

ENVA vs IX stock comparison

Enova International, Inc. vs ORIX CORPORATION, two Credit Services stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The margin lines run close, Enova's 9.95% net against Orix's 13.4%, but the businesses diverge sharply: Enova is a focused US online lender to non-prime consumers and small businesses, Orix a sprawling Japanese financial conglomerate. Enova earns the far higher return on equity, 23.3% against 9.8%, its concentrated subprime book out-returning the diversified holding by more than double. Enova trades at 18.8 times earnings, Orix has no usable P/E; Orix pays 2.64% in dividends against Enova's 1.6%. Both carry meaningful leverage, 3.45 and 1.43 turns. The pair prices a high-return US online lender against a diversified Japanese financial giant; Enova concentrates risk and earns for it, Orix spreads risk and earns less, and the market prices the concentration higher.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

ENVA vs IX: the numbers

MetricENVAIX
Price$230.90$38.30
Market cap$6.1B$42.9B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageGrowthMature
Implied growth (priced in)+1.2%
P/E18.8
P/B4.341.41
P/S1.851.93
EV/EBITDA13.313.5
Revenue growth+17.6%+7.5%
Gross margin60.4%
Operating margin23.7%13.7%
Net margin9.9%13.4%
Return on equity23.3%9.8%
Return on assets4.8%2.5%
Dividend yield1.6%2.6%
Debt / equity3.451.43
Altman Z (solvency)1.670.83
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 99 / 9
Full ENVA report → Full IX report →
Get boothcheck's read on ENVA and IX, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.