← boothcheck

AFRM vs ENVA stock comparison

Affirm Holdings, Inc. vs Enova International, Inc., two Credit Services stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

What is priced in: Affirm at 71 times earnings is priced for BNPL to become a mainstream payment rail; Enova at 18.8 for its online consumer-and-small-business lending to keep compounding, and the market pays nearly four times more per dollar for the younger story. Enova earns the far better returns, 23.3% on equity against 10.1%, nets 9.9% of revenue against Affirm's 9.6%, and throws off a 30.5% free-cash figure with a 1.6% dividend. Both carry heavy leverage, 3.45 and 2.35 turns, the shape of balance-sheet lenders. The pair prices two online-lending models, one merchant-integrated and premium-priced, one broad-consumer and cheap; Enova already earns what Affirm's multiple assumes it will.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

AFRM vs ENVA: the numbers

MetricAFRMENVA
Price$79.46$230.90
Market cap$27.7B$6.1B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageGrowthGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+1.2%
P/E71.018.8
P/B7.314.34
P/S6.961.85
EV/EBITDA57.213.3
Revenue growth+32.2%+17.6%
Gross margin60.4%
Operating margin8.5%23.7%
Net margin9.6%9.9%
Return on equity10.1%23.3%
Return on assets2.9%4.8%
Dividend yield1.6%
Debt / equity2.353.45
Altman Z (solvency)1.811.67
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 97 / 9
Full AFRM report → Full ENVA report →
Get boothcheck's read on AFRM and ENVA, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.