← boothcheck

AAPL vs NTAP stock comparison

Apple Inc. vs NetApp, Inc., two Computer Hardware stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

What the prices are betting could hardly be more different in scale and in kind. Apple, at $4.2 trillion and 34 times earnings, is priced as a franchise that will keep taxing its installed base indefinitely. NetApp, at $30B and 24 times, is priced as a mature storage vendor whose job is to hand cash back, and it does, a 6.1% free-cash yield with a 1.4% dividend. NetApp actually runs the higher gross margin, 70% to 49%, the arithmetic of software-heavy storage against hardware at planetary volume. Both return-on-equity figures, 115% and 94%, divide by buyback-shrunken equity and say less than they seem to. The small company pays you now; the large one charges you for permanence.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

AAPL vs NTAP: the numbers

MetricAAPLNTAP
Price$282.12$152.40
Market cap$4.15T$30.5B
SectorComputer HardwareComputer Hardware
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+32.6%+17.3%
P/E34.124.0
P/B39.0122.56
P/S9.204.40
EV/EBITDA27.917.0
Revenue growth+12.4%+5.2%
Gross margin49.3%70.1%
Operating margin32.3%27.3%
Net margin27.1%18.4%
Return on equity115.1%94.5%
Return on assets33.0%11.9%
Return on invested capital61.6%34.0%
FCF yield3.1%6.1%
Dividend yield0.4%1.4%
Debt / equity0.851.84
Current ratio1.071.44
Altman Z (solvency)7.612.97
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 96 / 9
Full AAPL report → Full NTAP report →
Get boothcheck's read on AAPL and NTAP, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.