SOUTHERN CO (SO): what the price requires
The current priced-in claim for SOUTHERN CO (SO) is temporarily suppressed because the live engine record is unavailable. The dated report remains a snapshot, not a current market read.
Generated: 2026-07-14 · Exported: 2026-07-16 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/SO
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | SO |
| Company | SOUTHERN CO |
| Sector / Industry | Utilities |
| Current price | $96.55/sh |
| Composition | Traditional Electric Operating Companies (Alabama/Georgia/Mississippi Power) 75% / Southern Power 8% / Southern Company Gas 17% |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin today | 27.1% |
| Multiple paid | 22x operating income |
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 6.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~18.9%/yr; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.51σ |
| cohort percentile (of 70 peers) | 56 |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple; asset-based/earnings-power land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 2.13x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.28x | 2 | expensive |
| Relative | 1.18x | 3 | expensive |
| Growth | 1.33x | 3 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=13)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $170.68 | 0.57x | yes | Reference only (OCF-based, capex excluded): OCF $9.8B |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $0.00 | — | no | Negative/zero FCF or EBITDA — equity value floored at $0 |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $83.06 | 1.16x | yes | P/E 20x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 16.6x / 20.0x / 23.4x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $27.29 | 3.54x | yes | Stage 1: -10% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $41.82 | 2.31x | yes | BV/sh $35.38, ROE (TTM) 10.9%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $45.31 | 2.13x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $72.75 | 1.33x | yes | Rev $30.2B, growth 9% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.0x / 3.6x / 4.2x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Growth-Adjusted P/E | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $42.39 | 2.28x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $5.96B × (1−15%) / WACC 9.1% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $45.98 | 2.10x | yes | BV $35.38 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 10.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 7.1%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $55.79 | 1.73x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $3.91 × BVPS $35.38) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $82.12 | 1.18x | yes | EBITDA $7.29B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $3.28 | 29.44x | yes | EPS $3.91 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $15.91 | 6.07x | yes | BV $35.38 × (ROIC 4.1% / WACC 9.1%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $66.88 | 1.44x | yes | Revenue $30.18B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $42.27 | 2.28x | yes | EPS $3.91 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $71.9b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 10.03x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 8.57x |
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 1.4% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- Southern is the rare utility with a genuine order book: over 11 gigawatts of contracted large-load capacity across 28 projects, first-quarter data center power usage up 42 percent year over year, and 10 gigawatts of generation under construction with an RFP filed for 2 to 6 more by 2033.
- The risk is that regulators, not markets, set the margin: the 10-K concedes commissions may not approve "full recovery of the costs of providing utility service" (accession 0000092122-26-000006), and $71.9 billion of net debt at roughly ten times pre-tax operating income makes the economics rate-sensitive on both meanings of the word.
- Watch the second-quarter report in late July 2026 for large-load contract additions, plus the Georgia Power All-Source RFP proceedings running through 2027 that decide the returns on the growth.
Bull Case
Southern Company is classified here as a growth stock, and that label, strange on a 120-year-old utility, is the whole thesis. Utilities grow when their service territory's demand grows, and Southern's territory is where the AI buildout physically plugs in: data centers consumed 42 percent more power in the first quarter of 2026 than a year earlier, total retail sales grew 2.3 percent in what the CFO called the strongest first-quarter growth in recent history, and operating revenues rose to $8.4 billion from $7.8 billion. For decades a percentage point of load growth was a good year in this industry. Southern signed roughly 2 gigawatts of additional large-load contracts in the first quarter alone, bringing contracted capacity above 11 gigawatts across 28 projects, with a pipeline of 23 gigawatts contracted or in late-stage development.
The regulated model converts that demand into a compounding machine. New load requires new generation and wires; the 10-K describes the investment program plainly, "investments to build new generation facilities to meet projected long-term demand requirements and to replace units being retired as part of the generation fleet transition" (accession 0000092122-26-000006), and regulated utilities earn an approved return on every prudent dollar of that rate base, with authorized returns like the 10.25 percent ROE cited for Atlanta Gas Light's infrastructure program in the same filing (accession 0000092122-26-000006). Georgia Power has 10 gigawatts of generation already under construction and just filed an All-Source RFP for 2 to 6 more gigawatts needed by 2033. Each gigawatt is future rate base, and each rate-base dollar is future regulated earnings.
Even the price analysis, run conservatively, leans friendly: at about 21 times operating income and a low utility-grade discount rate, the price sits below what even a sustained 5 percent annual decline in operating profit would warrant, which means the market is charging nothing for the growth inflection at all on that lens. The concessions are the sector's usual ones, $71.9 billion of net debt and a share count creeping up 1.4 percent a year to fund the buildout. But this is the rare utility where demand, regulation, and geography are all pulling the same direction at once, and the adjusted EPS of $1.32 in the first quarter is the early evidence.
Bear Case
Every dollar of Southern's earnings passes through a regulator's hands before it reaches a shareholder, and that is the sensitivity that governs this stock. The 10-K is explicit: "The Commissions set the rates Mississippi Power is permitted to charge customers", and for Alabama Power "there is a risk that the Commissions will not approve: (1) full recovery of the costs of providing utility service, or (2) full recovery of all amounts" invested (accession 0000092122-26-000006). The data center boom makes this politics sharper, not softer: residential customers and their elected commissioners will not quietly absorb grid costs incurred to serve hyperscalers, and every large-load contract Southern signs invites a rate-design fight about who pays for the new generation. The Georgia All-Source RFP process runs through 2027, which is two years of regulatory proceedings between the growth story and its approved economics.
The second macro lever is interest rates, and Southern carries more exposure than most: $71.9 billion of net debt, roughly ten times pre-tax operating income, against liquid assets of under $1 billion, with the share count growing 1.4 percent a year because the capital program outruns internal cash generation. A utility is a bond with a construction budget; when financing costs rise, the spread between authorized returns and the cost of the money that earns them compresses, and commissions historically lag in repricing. Construction itself is the third risk, and this company's record there needs no embellishment: multi-gigawatt buildouts in this industry have a long history of budget and schedule overruns, and Southern is now committing to one of the largest capacity expansions in its history simultaneously across states.
The valuation offers less shelter than the growth narrative suggests. Only the peer-multiple family reaches the price, and it sits in the upper half of the utility peer range; the asset-value and earnings-power reads land at roughly half the quote, and even the growth-based methods sit about 25 percent below it. One denominator note: EDGAR's trailing operating income reads $7.3 billion while the record basis prices $8.4 billion, different measurement bases, both stated. A buyer at $95.61 is paying a premium utility multiple for load growth whose economics are not yet approved, funded by debt and equity issuance, in a rate environment where the regulator, not management, decides the margin. If data center demand slows, or if commissions shift costs toward shareholders to shield ratepayers, the stock re-rates toward the utility median while the capex commitments stay.
Valuation
The price analysis lands in an odd, informative place for a utility. At $95.61 (July 10, 2026), Southern trades at about 21 times operating income on the record basis, and inverted at a 6.2 percent cost of capital, the price sits below what even a 5 percent annual operating-profit decline would warrant; that is a bound, not a solved growth path, and it says the demanding-looking multiple is arithmetically defensible even under decline, once utility-grade discount rates apply. At the same time, the multiple sits in the upper half of the utility peer range, so relative to its sector the market is already paying up. Both facts fit one story: the sector has re-rated on data center load growth, and Southern is priced as one of its leaders.
The families split along that seam. Peer multiples reach the price, landing about 15 percent below the quote at their central read; the growth-based methods sit roughly 25 percent below; and the asset-value and earnings-power reads sit at about half, which is typical for regulated utilities whose asset returns are capped by commissions. The filing-sourced economics beneath the growth thesis: an investment program to "build new generation facilities to meet projected long-term demand requirements" (accession 0000092122-26-000006), authorized returns exemplified by the 10.25 percent ROE on Atlanta Gas Light's infrastructure program (accession 0000092122-26-000006), and first-quarter operating revenues of $8.4 billion, up from $7.8 billion, with adjusted EPS of $1.32. The 11-plus gigawatts of contracted large load across 28 projects is the order book those returns will be earned on.
Solvency reads as utility-normal but worth stating: $71.9 billion of net debt at roughly ten times pre-tax operating income (EDGAR's trailing tally is $7.3 billion versus $8.4 billion on the record basis; both labeled), thin corporate liquidity, and 1.4 percent annual share growth funding the buildout. Leverage like this is the regulated model working as designed, recoverable through rates if commissions cooperate. The decisive variable is therefore not demand, which is contracted, but regulatory conversion: whether the Georgia RFP process and the various state proceedings through 2027 turn contracted gigawatts into approved rate base at healthy authorized returns.
Catalysts
The first-quarter 2026 report established the demand inflection: operating revenues of $8.4 billion rose from $7.8 billion a year earlier, adjusted EPS reached $1.32, total retail electricity sales grew 2.3 percent (the strongest first quarter in recent history per CFO David Poroch), and data center usage jumped 42 percent year over year, lifting weather-adjusted commercial-class sales 4.5 percent. The contracting pipeline moved with it: roughly 2 gigawatts of new large-load contracts signed in the quarter brought the contracted total above 11 gigawatts across 28 projects, with 23 gigawatts contracted or in late-stage development.
The regulatory calendar is the main forward machinery. Georgia Power filed an All-Source Request for Proposal for 2 to 6 gigawatts of new generation needed by 2033, incremental to the 10 gigawatts already under construction, with the process expected to run through 2027. Each stage of that proceeding, alongside rate cases and cost-recovery filings across Alabama, Georgia and Mississippi, converts contracted demand into approved returns, and each is a date where the economics can improve or erode.
The next earnings report, expected in late July 2026, carries three reads: whether the large-load contract count keeps climbing, whether data center usage growth sustains anything near the first quarter's pace, and financing costs on the capital program given the debt-heavy balance sheet and ongoing equity issuance. Southern's story is unusually legible for a utility: the demand is contracted and public; what remains uncertain, and what each catalyst resolves a piece of, is who pays for the buildout and at what authorized return.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Traditional Electric Operating Companies (Alabama/Georgia/Mississippi Power) (reported)
- DUK (DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- AEP (AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER CO INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- D (DOMINION ENERGY, INC)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- XEL (XCEL ENERGY INC)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- ED (CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- WEC (WEC ENERGY GROUP, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- ETR (ENTERGY CORP /DE/)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- EIX (EDISON INTERNATIONAL)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PPL (PPL Corp)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- FE (FIRSTENERGY CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- PNW (PINNACLE WEST CAPITAL CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- EVRG (EVERGY, INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Southern Power (reported)
- VST (Vistra Corp.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NRG (NRG Energy, Inc)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CEG (CONSTELLATION ENERGY CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- TLN (Talen Energy Corporation)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- CWEN (Clearway Energy, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- AES (AES CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Southern Company Gas (reported)
- ATO (ATMOS ENERGY CORP)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NI (NISOURCE INC.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NJR (NEW JERSEY RESOURCES CORPORATION)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- SWX (Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- SR (Spire Inc.)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NWN (NORTHWEST NATURAL HOLDING COMPANY)
- (no filing in the citation store)
- NFG (NATIONAL FUEL GAS CO)
- (no filing in the citation store)
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Q1 2026 results and Utility Dive, May 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call, May 2026 · Q1 2026 earnings call and Utility Dive, May 2026 · Q1 2026 results presentation, May 2026 · Q1 2026 results, May 2026 · Q1 2026 results, StockTitan and Utility Dive, May 2026 · Q1 2026 results presentation via Investing.com, May 2026