PACS Group, Inc. (PACS): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $45.63, PACS Group, Inc. (PACS) is priced for +10.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/PACS

Headline

FieldValue
TickerPACS
CompanyPACS Group, Inc.
Current price$45.63/sh
CompositionMedicare 34% / Medicaid 40% / Managed care 19% / Private and other 7%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)1.0%
Operating margin today7.0%
Margin compression (value-band)-6.0pp
Implied growth10.4%
Multiple paid28x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 5: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

Solve inputs: computed at a 7.2% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage; each 1pp of cost of capital moves the implied operating-profit growth ~8.8pp.

Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~5.4 years; the models below use their own rates.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
cohort percentile (of 117 peers)68
sustained it ~5 years at this level56%
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset2.31x4expensive
Earnings2.96x4expensive
Relative1.51x5expensive
Growth0.67x2justifies

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 6.4%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=15)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowthno
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$86.220.53xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 24.9x / 26.9x / 28.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelative$30.121.51xyesP/E 21.49x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 30x), scenarios: 17.4x / 21.5x / 25.6x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 16.47x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowthno
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$16.652.74xyesBV/sh $6.55, ROE (TTM) 23.5%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$26.521.72xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$56.430.81xyesRev $5.4B, growth 24% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 1.1x / 1.3x / 1.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$18.602.45xyesEPS $1.55, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=15.75 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$0.014563.00xyesNormalized EBIT (3y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.25B × (1−29%) / WACC 6.4% → EPV (no growth) (excluded from median)
Residual IncomeAsset$24.311.88xyesBV $6.55 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 23.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$15.123.02xyes√(22.5 × EPS $1.55 × BVPS $6.55) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$9.704.70xyesEBITDA $0.38B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$14.273.20xyesFCF $490.3M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$10.024.55xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.43B (FCF $0.49B − SBC $0.06B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$50.010.91xyesEPS $1.55 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$2.1421.32xyesBV $6.55 × (ROIC 2.1% / WACC 6.4%) (excluded from median)
P/Sales SectorRelative$85.810.53xyesRevenue $5.43B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$58.130.78xyesEPS $1.55 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$16.762.72xyesEPS $1.55 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
Post-acute / skilled nursing healthcare servicesoperatingenterprise5.3B reported-currencywithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$276.0m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)1.02x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.72x
Interest coverage13.7x
Share count CAGR (dilution)8.0%
Burning cashno

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Frame PACS correctly first: this is a growth-stage skilled-nursing roll-up, not a mature healthcare facility owner, and that changes how the numbers should be read. The company acquires under-occupied nursing facilities, raises their occupancy and skilled-patient mix, and compounds the cash flow. The recent results show the model working. Q1 2026 revenue grew 11.2% to $1.42 billion, same-store skilled-nursing revenue rose 8.0%, and occupancy improved to 90.9% from 89.6%, with skilled mix up in both revenue and nursing patient days (PACS Q1 2026, stocktitan). The filings describe management monitoring skilled mix as the core operating metric because the payor mix significantly affects revenue and profitability (FY2025 10-K, accession 0002001184-26-000005). Rising occupancy and a richer skilled mix are precisely the levers that turn an acquired facility into a profit center.

The demographic tailwind is the structural case. The US population over 80 is growing rapidly, and skilled-nursing capacity has not kept pace, so an operator that can run facilities efficiently and acquire more has a long runway of demand. PACS competes in the same model as Ensign, the cohort benchmark, whose own filing describes attracting higher-acuity patients to lift revenue (ENSG FY2025 10-K, accession 0001125376-26-000007). PACS has been growing its share count at about 8% a year to fund acquisitions, which is dilutive but is the standard fuel for a roll-up in expansion phase. Interest coverage is comfortable at about 13.7x and net debt of roughly $276 million is modest against trailing operating income near $381 million.

The valuation reflects a company priced for that compounding. At $36.62 only the forward-growth method reaches the price (DCF Exit Multiple at $77), while the asset and earnings-power methods sit below it, the classic shape of a durability premium for a business the static frames cannot fully value. The implied assumption is about 8.1% annual operating growth for five years, which is well within what a successful skilled-nursing roll-up can deliver given the demographic demand and the occupancy-and-mix lever. If PACS keeps lifting occupancy toward the low 90s and continues acquiring facilities, the growth method is the right lens and the price is defensible.

Bear Case

Lead with the external variable that has the most leverage over PACS, because for a skilled-nursing operator it dwarfs everything else: government reimbursement. The overwhelming majority of revenue comes from Medicare and Medicaid, whose rates are set by federal and state policy, not by the market. A change to skilled-nursing reimbursement rates, the introduction of staffing mandates, or tighter eligibility rules can compress margins across the entire portfolio at once, with no offsetting lever available to the company. The current price implies steady operating growth, but it does not obviously price the tail risk that a single regulatory decision resets the economics of the business. For a company this dependent on a single payor structure, that policy exposure is the dominant risk and the hardest to hedge.

The governance and accounting history is the second red flag, and it is recent. PACS restated its consolidated financial statements for the first two quarters of 2024, removing as much as $65 million of previously reported skilled-nursing revenue after an internal review, following an activist firm's allegations about potential misuse of a Medicare waiver during the pandemic (McKnight's Long-Term Care News). A restatement of that size, tied to how the company recognized government revenue, is exactly the kind of issue that should make an investor cautious about the quality and durability of the reported numbers. The improved Q1 2026 results are encouraging, but they come from a company that was recently found to have misstated revenue, and rebuilding that trust takes more than one clean quarter.

The roll-up structure compounds both risks. Growth by acquisition requires continuous capital and integration, the share count is climbing about 8% a year to fund it, and each deal must clear a higher bar as the base grows. A skilled-nursing roll-up is leveraged to occupancy, labor availability and cost, and reimbursement all at once, and the asset and earnings-power methods say the price is already rich on the current numbers (Simple Excess Return $16, Graham Number $15, against the $36.62 price (June 27, 2026)). The reverse-DCF floored at the current price, meaning the inversion could not find much positive growth implied. The bear case is a recently-restated, acquisition-dependent operator whose fortunes rest on government reimbursement it cannot control, priced for continued compounding with little cushion if policy turns or the next quarter disappoints.

Valuation

PACS should be valued as a growth-stage roll-up, and the methods reflect that posture. That dispersion is the signature of a durability premium: the static frames, which assume no further compounding, cannot reach a price that is paying for the roll-up to keep executing. Several methods are distorted and should be ignored, the Earnings Power Value figure prints near zero on a low normalized-EBIT input, and the ROIC-justified figure reflects an artificially low trailing return on capital from heavy acquisition activity.

The inversion gives the cleaner read. At $36.62 the market pays about 27x company-wide operating income, implying roughly 8.1% annual operating growth for five years, computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth, where each point of cost of capital moves the implied growth about 9 points. That 8.1% pace is within what a successful skilled-nursing operator can deliver through occupancy gains, skilled-mix improvement, and acquisitions, so the priced-in assumption reads as within range. There is a measurement caveat: the trailing operating-income figures from different sources diverge by more than 10% here, so the precise multiple should be held loosely.

Catalysts

PACS Group reported Q1 2026 results with revenue up 11.2% to $1.42 billion, same-store skilled-nursing revenue up 8.0%, occupancy improved to 90.9% from 89.6%, and net income up sharply, while raising its 2026 EBITDA outlook (PACS Q1 2026, stocktitan). The company also restated its consolidated financial statements for the first two quarters of 2024, removing as much as $65 million of previously reported revenue following an internal review tied to a pandemic-era Medicare waiver, after an activist firm raised concerns in late 2024 (McKnight's Long-Term Care News).

The forward setup is a recovery story against a regulatory backdrop. The catalysts to watch are the continued return to timely, clean financial reporting and any further developments from the audit-committee review, since restored trust in the numbers is the gate to the stock being valued on fundamentals. Operationally, watch occupancy trends (toward and above 91%), skilled-mix improvement, and the pace of facility acquisitions that drive the roll-up. The dominant external catalyst is government reimbursement policy: Medicare and Medicaid rate decisions, any federal staffing mandates, and state Medicaid budgets all have direct leverage over margins. The next quarterly print is a test of whether the operating momentum holds and whether the accounting overhang is genuinely behind the company.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Post-acute / skilled nursing healthcare services (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive PACS report on boothcheck