← boothcheck

FMS vs PACS stock comparison

FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE AG vs PACS Group, Inc., two Medical Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

PACS earns 23.4% on equity against Fresenius Medical's 8.3%, skilled nursing out-returning global dialysis by a factor the scale gap cannot explain, $7B against $14B. The margin lines are closer, 8.5% and 11.7% operating, so the return gap is asset intensity: dialysis clinics and machines against leased nursing facilities. The multiples price the smaller returner dearer, 27 times earnings against 12.7. Fresenius' rebuttal is cash and yield, a 21.5% free-cash figure and 1.7% dividend against 7.2% and 0.5%. Both sheets are conservative. High returns at a high price against modest returns at a low one; the pair is the sector's cleanest value-versus-quality standoff.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

FMS vs PACS: the numbers

MetricFMSPACS
Price$23.25$41.88
Market cap$13.6B$6.8B
SectorMedical CareMedical Care
StageMatureGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+7.9%
P/E12.727.0
P/B0.876.51
P/S0.641.25
EV/EBITDA3.317.8
Revenue growth+1.5%+23.6%
Operating margin11.7%8.4%
Net margin6.1%4.5%
Return on equity8.3%23.4%
Return on assets3.8%4.3%
Return on invested capital10.1%21.0%
FCF yield21.4%7.2%
Dividend yield1.7%0.5%
Debt / equity0.000.24
Current ratio1.260.99
Altman Z (solvency)1.762.01
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 97 / 9
Full FMS report → Full PACS report →
Get boothcheck's read on FMS and PACS, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.