Macy's, Inc. (M): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers Macy's, Inc. (M) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/M

Headline

FieldValue
TickerM
CompanyMacy's, Inc.
Current price$25.50/sh
CompositionWomen's Accessories, Shoes, Cosmetics and Fragrances 40% / Women's Apparel 21% / Men's and Kids' 21% / Home/Other 14% / Credit card revenues, net 3% / Macy's Media Network revenue, net 1%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)2.8%
Operating margin today4.6%
Margin compression (value-band)-1.8pp
Multiple paid8x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.28σ
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.81x5justifies
Earnings0.55x5justifies
Relative0.46x5justifies
Growth1.10x4expensive

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=19)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$69.290.37xyesFCF base $1.4B, growth -0% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.7%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$40.670.63xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 4.1x / 6.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelative$55.490.46xyesP/E 17.22x (blended: static sector reference 22x + trailing (TTM) 10x), scenarios: 14.6x / 17.2x / 19.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 10.02x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$15.611.63xyesStage 1: 7% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$27.410.93xyesBV/sh $18.39, ROE (TTM) 13.8%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$33.140.77xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$16.261.57xyesRev $22.7B, growth -0% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.2x / 0.3x / 0.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$29.040.88xyesEPS $2.42, growth 7% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.53 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$46.770.55xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.53B × (1−32%) / WACC 7.7% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$34.260.74xyesBV $18.39 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$31.640.81xyes√(22.5 × EPS $2.42 × BVPS $18.39) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$98.560.26xyesEBITDA $1.93B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$54.240.47xyesFCF $1425.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$51.770.49xyesSBC-adj FCF $1.36B (FCF $1.43B − SBC $0.06B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$43.840.58xyesEPS $2.42 × (8.5 + 2×6.6%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$3.048.39xyesBV $18.39 × (ROIC 1.3% / WACC 7.7%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$172.750.15xyesRevenue $22.72B × sector P/S 2.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$23.811.07xyesEPS $2.42 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 6.6% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 9.8x
Earnings YieldEarnings$26.160.97xyesEPS $2.42 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$1.2b
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)1.62x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)1.10x
Share count CAGR (buyback)-1.6%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

The one number that frames the whole thesis is the owned real estate. Macy's owns 243 of its roughly 665 stores, including the Herald Square flagship valued independently at $1 billion to $3 billion, an asset base that quietly underpins a $24.13 stock.

The operating turn is real. Q1 2026 comparable sales rose 3.0%, the strongest first quarter in four years, with Bloomingdale's up 10.2% and Bluemercury up 6.4%, and management raised full-year guidance to $2.00 to $2.20 in adjusted EPS.

The price is supported by every valuation family at once, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and forward growth. This is a value name with a real-estate floor, not a growth bet, and Berkshire Hathaway recently took a position.

Bull Case

The single most decisive number here is not a sales line, it is the deed to the buildings. Macy's owns 243 of its roughly 665 stores, and the FY2025 10-K's properties schedule lists owned locations across the country, from a Chicago flagship to fulfillment facilities in Goodyear, Arizona and Joppa, Maryland (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315). The Herald Square flagship alone has been independently valued at between $1 billion and $3 billion. Against a market value where the entire equity trades at $24.13 (June 27, 2026) a share, the owned property portfolio is widely estimated to be worth more than the whole company's market capitalization. If that single fact changes, if the market began to price the real estate honestly, the verdict on the stock flips. That asset floor is why activists have litigated this portfolio for years and why Berkshire Hathaway recently took a stake.

Underneath the real estate, the operating business is turning rather than dying. Q1 2026 comparable sales rose 3.0%, the strongest first-quarter comparable performance in four years, on net sales of $4.6 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.16, all above prior guidance. The Bold New Chapter strategy is visibly working: the roughly 200 remodeled Macy's stores posted a 2.4% comparable gain, Bloomingdale's rose 10.2%, and Bluemercury rose 6.4%. The 10-K documents the comparable-sales construction the company reports against (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315), and the recent trend is the best read in years. Management raised full-year guidance to net sales of $21.5 billion to $21.75 billion and adjusted EPS of $2.00 to $2.20.

Capital return ties the asset story to the shareholder. In 2025 Macy's returned $447 million through $197 million of dividends and $250 million of buybacks, with $1.1 billion still authorized, and it has raised the annual dividend roughly 27% since reinstating it in 2021. The share count is shrinking at about 1.6% a year. Across all four valuation families, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and forward growth, the price is supported, with the blended X-ray figure near $32 against a $24 quote. A profitable, cash-returning retailer trading below the value of its own buildings, with comps inflecting positive and a new long-term holder in Berkshire, is a value setup with a hard floor.

Bear Case

Strip away the real estate excitement and the qualitative truth is uncomfortable: this is a mall-anchor department store in a category that has been shrinking for two decades, and owning the buildings does not change the trajectory of the business inside them. Foot traffic at enclosed malls keeps drifting lower, off-price and direct-to-consumer channels keep taking share, and Macy's answer is to close stores, with 14 non-go-forward locations shut at the end of fiscal 2025 and a $145 million annual sales headwind expected from those closures. A turnaround that depends on closing your way to growth is, structurally, a managed decline dressed as a strategy. The 3% comp was the best in four years, which is another way of saying the prior several years were worse.

The price-to-fundamentals gap that bulls celebrate cuts both ways. The same 10-K that shows owned real estate also shows the operating reality: the company reports comparable sales that have repeatedly turned negative, with the disclosed comparable-sales table reflecting declines on an owned-plus-licensed basis in prior years (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315). Asset value is only worth what someone will pay to unlock it, and the real estate has been litigated by activists for years without a clean monetization, because the buildings are most valuable as operating stores and least valuable empty in fading malls. A sum-of-the-parts that requires liquidating the operating business to realize is a thesis that fights itself.

The balance sheet is the third caution. Net debt sits at roughly $1.15 billion, and the company's filings do not separately report interest expense in a way that lets coverage be cleanly computed, which is itself a wrinkle for a leveraged retailer. The brand also carries event and reputation risk that the 10-K flags directly, noting exposure to incidents "at a parade or other branded event" that could damage the brand (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315). The current trailing margin near 4.6% sits below the 7.5% mid-cycle figure the valuation leans on, so the price already assumes a margin recovery the secular backdrop may not allow. Cheap-on-assets has been the bull case for Macy's for a decade, and for a decade the assets stayed locked.

Valuation

This is a value name with an unusually broad base of support. Against the $24.13 price, all four X-ray families land at or above the quote: asset-based, earnings-power, relative-multiple, and growth-DCF value each support the price, and the blended figure across seven applicable methods lands near $31.96. The priced-in characterization is within range, and explicitly flags this as a value and asset-supported name rather than a growth bet.

The margin assumption is the lever. The valuation prices a conservative terminal operating margin near 2.9%, against a mid-cycle figure of 7.5% and a current trailing margin around 4.6%. That conservatism is the model declining to extrapolate the recent comp recovery into a durable margin, which leaves upside if the Bold New Chapter execution sticks and downside protection if it does not. The asset-based support is the distinctive piece: with 243 owned stores including the Herald Square flagship, the property schedule in the 10-K (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315) backs a floor that pure-multiple retailers lack.

The balance sheet is manageable but not pristine. Net debt of about $1.15 billion against gross debt of $2.45 billion is modest for a company of this scale, though the inability to cleanly compute interest coverage from the filings is a caveat worth noting. Net-debt-to-operating-income near 0.7 on a mid-cycle basis is comfortable. The honest read is that the price already embeds a value-trap discount: it is supported by every method, but every method is anchored to a business the market expects to fade. The reward is the gap to asset value and the comp inflection; the risk is that the gap persists because the assets only realize on liquidation.

Catalysts

Q1 2026 results (reported June 2026) were the recent catalyst and they beat: comparable sales up 3.0%, the strongest first quarter in four years, on net sales of $4.6 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.16, all above prior guidance. The Bold New Chapter remodel cohort of roughly 200 stores rose 2.4% comparable, Bloomingdale's rose 10.2%, and Bluemercury rose 6.4%. CEO Tony Spring raised full-year guidance to net sales of $21.5 billion to $21.75 billion and adjusted EPS of $2.00 to $2.20, so the next several prints test whether the comp recovery is durable or a remodel-driven pull-forward.

The ownership story is the structural catalyst. Berkshire Hathaway recently took a position in Macy's, its first department-store bet in decades, an endorsement that draws attention to the real estate and capital-return profile. The owned portfolio, 243 stores including a Herald Square flagship valued at $1 billion to $3 billion, has long attracted activist interest and at least one takeover bid, and any move toward monetization or a sale-leaseback would be a sharp re-rating event.

Capital return is the steady catalyst underneath. Macy's returned $447 million to shareholders in 2025, has $1.1 billion remaining on its buyback authorization, and has raised its dividend roughly 27% since 2021, with one forecast pointing to $2.4 billion of buybacks over the next decade. Store closures remain a moving piece, with fiscal 2025 closures creating a $145 million annual sales headwind that the go-forward fleet must outgrow. Analyst consensus sits at Hold, so a sustained run of positive comps could prompt upgrades that the current rating does not reflect.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Core business (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

View the full interactive M report on boothcheck