Macy's, Inc. (M): what the price assumes
boothcheck covers Macy's, Inc. (M) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/M
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | M |
| Company | Macy's, Inc. |
| Current price | $25.50/sh |
| Composition | Women's Accessories, Shoes, Cosmetics and Fragrances 40% / Women's Apparel 21% / Men's and Kids' 21% / Home/Other 14% / Credit card revenues, net 3% / Macy's Media Network revenue, net 1% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 2.8% |
| Operating margin today | 4.6% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -1.8pp |
| Multiple paid | 8x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.
Solve inputs: computed at a 8.1% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.
How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +0.28σ |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 0.81x | 5 | justifies |
| Earnings | 0.55x | 5 | justifies |
| Relative | 0.46x | 5 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.10x | 4 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.7%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=19)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $69.29 | 0.37x | yes | FCF base $1.4B, growth -0% (input: historical growth), terminal g 0.5%, WACC 7.7%, 5yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $40.67 | 0.63x | yes | Exit EV/EBITDA: 4.0x / 4.1x / 6.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $55.49 | 0.46x | yes | P/E 17.22x (blended: static sector reference 22x + trailing (TTM) 10x), scenarios: 14.6x / 17.2x / 19.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 10.02x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | $15.61 | 1.63x | yes | Stage 1: 7% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $27.41 | 0.93x | yes | BV/sh $18.39, ROE (TTM) 13.8%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $33.14 | 0.77x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $16.26 | 1.57x | yes | Rev $22.7B, growth -0% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.2x / 0.3x / 0.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $29.04 | 0.88x | yes | EPS $2.42, growth 7% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=1.53 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $46.77 | 0.55x | yes | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $1.53B × (1−32%) / WACC 7.7% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $34.26 | 0.74x | yes | BV $18.39 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 13.8% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $31.64 | 0.81x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.42 × BVPS $18.39) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $98.56 | 0.26x | yes | EBITDA $1.93B × sector EV/EBITDA 14.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $54.24 | 0.47x | yes | FCF $1425.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $51.77 | 0.49x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $1.36B (FCF $1.43B − SBC $0.06B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $43.84 | 0.58x | yes | EPS $2.42 × (8.5 + 2×6.6%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $3.04 | 8.39x | yes | BV $18.39 × (ROIC 1.3% / WACC 7.7%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $172.75 | 0.15x | yes | Revenue $22.72B × sector P/S 2.0x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $23.81 | 1.07x | yes | EPS $2.42 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 6.6% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 9.8x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $26.16 | 0.97x | yes | EPS $2.42 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net debt | $1.2b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | 1.62x |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | 1.10x |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -1.6% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
The one number that frames the whole thesis is the owned real estate. Macy's owns 243 of its roughly 665 stores, including the Herald Square flagship valued independently at $1 billion to $3 billion, an asset base that quietly underpins a $24.13 stock.
The operating turn is real. Q1 2026 comparable sales rose 3.0%, the strongest first quarter in four years, with Bloomingdale's up 10.2% and Bluemercury up 6.4%, and management raised full-year guidance to $2.00 to $2.20 in adjusted EPS.
The price is supported by every valuation family at once, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and forward growth. This is a value name with a real-estate floor, not a growth bet, and Berkshire Hathaway recently took a position.
Bull Case
The single most decisive number here is not a sales line, it is the deed to the buildings. Macy's owns 243 of its roughly 665 stores, and the FY2025 10-K's properties schedule lists owned locations across the country, from a Chicago flagship to fulfillment facilities in Goodyear, Arizona and Joppa, Maryland (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315). The Herald Square flagship alone has been independently valued at between $1 billion and $3 billion. Against a market value where the entire equity trades at $24.13 (June 27, 2026) a share, the owned property portfolio is widely estimated to be worth more than the whole company's market capitalization. If that single fact changes, if the market began to price the real estate honestly, the verdict on the stock flips. That asset floor is why activists have litigated this portfolio for years and why Berkshire Hathaway recently took a stake.
Underneath the real estate, the operating business is turning rather than dying. Q1 2026 comparable sales rose 3.0%, the strongest first-quarter comparable performance in four years, on net sales of $4.6 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.16, all above prior guidance. The Bold New Chapter strategy is visibly working: the roughly 200 remodeled Macy's stores posted a 2.4% comparable gain, Bloomingdale's rose 10.2%, and Bluemercury rose 6.4%. The 10-K documents the comparable-sales construction the company reports against (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315), and the recent trend is the best read in years. Management raised full-year guidance to net sales of $21.5 billion to $21.75 billion and adjusted EPS of $2.00 to $2.20.
Capital return ties the asset story to the shareholder. In 2025 Macy's returned $447 million through $197 million of dividends and $250 million of buybacks, with $1.1 billion still authorized, and it has raised the annual dividend roughly 27% since reinstating it in 2021. The share count is shrinking at about 1.6% a year. Across all four valuation families, asset value, earnings power, peer multiples, and forward growth, the price is supported, with the blended X-ray figure near $32 against a $24 quote. A profitable, cash-returning retailer trading below the value of its own buildings, with comps inflecting positive and a new long-term holder in Berkshire, is a value setup with a hard floor.
Bear Case
Strip away the real estate excitement and the qualitative truth is uncomfortable: this is a mall-anchor department store in a category that has been shrinking for two decades, and owning the buildings does not change the trajectory of the business inside them. Foot traffic at enclosed malls keeps drifting lower, off-price and direct-to-consumer channels keep taking share, and Macy's answer is to close stores, with 14 non-go-forward locations shut at the end of fiscal 2025 and a $145 million annual sales headwind expected from those closures. A turnaround that depends on closing your way to growth is, structurally, a managed decline dressed as a strategy. The 3% comp was the best in four years, which is another way of saying the prior several years were worse.
The price-to-fundamentals gap that bulls celebrate cuts both ways. The same 10-K that shows owned real estate also shows the operating reality: the company reports comparable sales that have repeatedly turned negative, with the disclosed comparable-sales table reflecting declines on an owned-plus-licensed basis in prior years (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315). Asset value is only worth what someone will pay to unlock it, and the real estate has been litigated by activists for years without a clean monetization, because the buildings are most valuable as operating stores and least valuable empty in fading malls. A sum-of-the-parts that requires liquidating the operating business to realize is a thesis that fights itself.
The balance sheet is the third caution. Net debt sits at roughly $1.15 billion, and the company's filings do not separately report interest expense in a way that lets coverage be cleanly computed, which is itself a wrinkle for a leveraged retailer. The brand also carries event and reputation risk that the 10-K flags directly, noting exposure to incidents "at a parade or other branded event" that could damage the brand (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315). The current trailing margin near 4.6% sits below the 7.5% mid-cycle figure the valuation leans on, so the price already assumes a margin recovery the secular backdrop may not allow. Cheap-on-assets has been the bull case for Macy's for a decade, and for a decade the assets stayed locked.
Valuation
This is a value name with an unusually broad base of support. Against the $24.13 price, all four X-ray families land at or above the quote: asset-based, earnings-power, relative-multiple, and growth-DCF value each support the price, and the blended figure across seven applicable methods lands near $31.96. The priced-in characterization is within range, and explicitly flags this as a value and asset-supported name rather than a growth bet.
The margin assumption is the lever. The valuation prices a conservative terminal operating margin near 2.9%, against a mid-cycle figure of 7.5% and a current trailing margin around 4.6%. That conservatism is the model declining to extrapolate the recent comp recovery into a durable margin, which leaves upside if the Bold New Chapter execution sticks and downside protection if it does not. The asset-based support is the distinctive piece: with 243 owned stores including the Herald Square flagship, the property schedule in the 10-K (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001628280-25-014315) backs a floor that pure-multiple retailers lack.
The balance sheet is manageable but not pristine. Net debt of about $1.15 billion against gross debt of $2.45 billion is modest for a company of this scale, though the inability to cleanly compute interest coverage from the filings is a caveat worth noting. Net-debt-to-operating-income near 0.7 on a mid-cycle basis is comfortable. The honest read is that the price already embeds a value-trap discount: it is supported by every method, but every method is anchored to a business the market expects to fade. The reward is the gap to asset value and the comp inflection; the risk is that the gap persists because the assets only realize on liquidation.
Catalysts
Q1 2026 results (reported June 2026) were the recent catalyst and they beat: comparable sales up 3.0%, the strongest first quarter in four years, on net sales of $4.6 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.16, all above prior guidance. The Bold New Chapter remodel cohort of roughly 200 stores rose 2.4% comparable, Bloomingdale's rose 10.2%, and Bluemercury rose 6.4%. CEO Tony Spring raised full-year guidance to net sales of $21.5 billion to $21.75 billion and adjusted EPS of $2.00 to $2.20, so the next several prints test whether the comp recovery is durable or a remodel-driven pull-forward.
The ownership story is the structural catalyst. Berkshire Hathaway recently took a position in Macy's, its first department-store bet in decades, an endorsement that draws attention to the real estate and capital-return profile. The owned portfolio, 243 stores including a Herald Square flagship valued at $1 billion to $3 billion, has long attracted activist interest and at least one takeover bid, and any move toward monetization or a sale-leaseback would be a sharp re-rating event.
Capital return is the steady catalyst underneath. Macy's returned $447 million to shareholders in 2025, has $1.1 billion remaining on its buyback authorization, and has raised its dividend roughly 27% since 2021, with one forecast pointing to $2.4 billion of buybacks over the next decade. Store closures remain a moving piece, with fiscal 2025 closures creating a $145 million annual sales headwind that the go-forward fleet must outgrow. Analyst consensus sits at Hold, so a sustained run of positive comps could prompt upgrades that the current rating does not reflect.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- KSS (KOHL'S CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …to excel in their jobs and serve our customers. We are committed to the highest integrity standards and maintain a Code of Ethics to guide ethical decision-making for associates. As a company of integrity, we expect our associates to be honest and accountable. Our ethics training, which we require all associates to…
- FY2025 10-K: …of 50 basis points to last year. The increase in gross margin was driven by lower freight costs and strong inventory management as our receipts were down 5% to last year as we continue to benefit from operating with greater flexibility. This was partially offset by elevated shrink levels. Selling, General, and…
- DDS (DILLARD’S, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and Internet and mail-order retailers. Although we are a large regional department store, some of our competitors are larger than us with greater financial resources and, as a result, may be able to devote greater resources to sourcing, promoting and selling their products. Additionally, we compete in certain markets…
- FY2025 10-K: …of net sales 26.7 % 25.4 % 24.4 % Cash flow provided by operations (in millions) $ 714.1 $ 883.6 $ 948.4 Total retail store count at end of period 272 273 277 Retail sales per square foot $ 137 $ 143 $ 146 Retail stores sales trend (2) % * (5) % ** 5 % Comparable retail store sales…
- BURL (BURLINGTON STORES, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …we have diversified our product offerings, we believe traffic to our stores is still driven, in part, by weather patterns. Competition and Margin Pressure. We believe that in order to remain competitive with retailers, including off-price retailers and discount stores, we must continue to offer brand-name merchandise…
- FY2025 10-K: …with other retailers, expand their merchandise offerings, expand their e-commerce capabilities, and/or add new sales channels, change their pricing strategies, or use technology more effectively than we do, including the use of artificial intelligence. More generally, consumer e-commerce spending may continue to…
- TGT (TARGET CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …and Analysis of Financial Condition for 2023, as compared to 2022, is included in Part II, Item 7, MD&A to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 2024 . Net Sales Net Sales includes Merchandise Sales and revenues from other sources, most notably advertising revenue and credit card…
- FY2025 10-K: …of macroeconomic, competitive, and consumer behavioral factors, as well as sales mix, and transfer of sales to new stores makes further analysis of sales metrics infeasible. TD Bank Group offers credit to qualified guests through Target-branded credit cards: the Target Credit Card and the Target MasterCard Credit…
- DG (DOLLAR GENERAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …service offerings, product sourcing and supply chain capacity, in-stock consistency, customer service, ease of shopping experience (including but not limited to various modes of shopping, including online alternatives and delivery), promotional activity, employees, and market share. We compete with discount stores…
- FY2025 10-K: …operate stores in many of the areas where we operate, and many of them engage in extensive advertising and marketing efforts. Our direct competitors include Family Dollar, Dollar Tree, and various local, independent operators, as well as Walmart, Target, Kroger, Aldi, Costco, Sams Club, BJ's Wholesale Club,…
- DLTR (DOLLAR TREE, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …operations and financial condition of our continuing operations. Overview We are a leading operator of more than 8,800 retail discount stores, as of February 1, 2025, offering merchandise predominantly at the opening price point of $1.25, with additional offerings at higher price points. Our net sales are derived…
- FY2025 10-K: …our prices, but our ability to do so may be limited with the result that we could see lower sales or reduced profitability. We expect competition to increase in the future. There are no significant economic barriers for others to enter our retail sector. We compete with discount stores and many other retailers,…
- FIVE (Five Below, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …factors effectively may affect our ability to timely build or lease new facilities, which could have a material adverse effect on our future growth and profitability. 25 We operate in a competitive environment and, as a result, we may not be able to compete effectively or maintain or increase our sales, market shares…
- FY2025 10-K: …experience and product offerings. Our competitors may seek to copy our business strategy and in-store experience, which could result in a reduction of any competitive advantage or special appeal that we might possess. In addition, most of our products are sold to us on a non-exclusive basis. As a result, our current…
- PSMT (PriceSmart, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …as currency rate changes, changes in tax rates or in the methods used to calculate or collect taxes on our sales or income and other factors that can increase costs. We might not be able to adjust prices, operate more efficiently or increase our comparable store net sales in the future to a great enough extent to…
- FY2025 10-K: …retailers, including Walmart Inc. in Central America and Grupo Éxito in Colombia and Cencosud in South America. We have noted that certain retailers are making investments in upgrading their locations or opening new stores which may result in increased competition. Further, it is possible that other warehouse club…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.