← boothcheck

COST vs M stock comparison

COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP /NEW vs Macy's, Inc., two Discount Stores stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Where COST and M diverge most: on revenue growth, COST reads +9.3% and M reads -0.2%; on fcf yield, COST reads 2.2% and M reads 23.1%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What COST's price implies is a demanding bet versus history and the cohort (whole-company basis). What M's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.

COST vs M: the numbers

MetricCOSTM
Price$916.05$22.65
Market cap$407.1B$6.2B
SectorDiscount StoresDiscount Stores
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+30.5%
P/E46.19.4
P/B12.151.28
P/S1.390.27
EV/EBITDA28.63.8
Revenue growth+9.3%-0.2%
Operating margin4.0%2.3%
Net margin3.0%2.9%
Return on equity26.4%13.8%
Return on assets10.2%4.1%
Return on invested capital22.6%9.8%
FCF yield2.2%23.1%
Dividend yield0.5%3.2%
Debt / equity0.170.50
Current ratio1.071.48
Altman Z (solvency)8.597.58
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 97 / 9
Full COST report → Full M report →
Get boothcheck's read on COST and M, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.