International Seaways, Inc. (INSW): what the price assumes

boothcheck covers International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) but does not put one priced-in number on it: here the defensible answer is the evidence rather than a point estimate. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating. Narrative composed 2026-06-27.

Generated: 2026-07-29 · Exported: 2026-08-01 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/INSW

Headline

FieldValue
TickerINSW
CompanyInternational Seaways, Inc.
Current price$94.01/sh
CompositionCrude Tankers 52% / Product Carriers 48%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Operating margin (value-band context)8.3%
Operating margin today58.3%
Margin compression (value-band)-50.0pp
Multiple paid10x operating income

The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 12: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.

The price sits below what even a 5%/yr operating-profit decline would warrant; the inversion reports a bound, not a solved growth path.

Solve inputs: computed at a 8.8% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage.

How unusual the bet is: within-range

ReferenceValue
vs own history+0.02σ
cohort percentile (of 222 peers)7
implied end-window share0%

Valuation X-Ray

The price is supported by asset-based and earnings-power and relative-multiple and growth-DCF value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset0.79x5justifies
Earnings0.93x4justifies
Relative0.51x5justifies
Growth0.43x4justifies

Families that justify the price: Asset, Earnings, Relative, Growth

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 8.3%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=18)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$372.370.25xyesFCF base $0.5B, growth 20% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 8.3%, 7yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$171.100.55xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 5.0x / 7.0x / 9.0x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 7yr
Relative ValuationRelative$192.890.49xyesP/E 15.42x (blended: static sector reference 20x + trailing (TTM) 9x), scenarios: 12.5x / 15.4x / 18.3x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 13x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$303.690.31xyesStage 1: 20% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$118.700.79xyesBV/sh $44.14, ROE (TTM) 24.9%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$195.570.48xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$100.940.93xyesRev $1.0B, growth 20% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.9x / 4.7x / 5.6x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x)
Peter Lynch Fair ValueRelative$131.760.71xyesEPS $10.98, growth 2% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=5.22 (Overvalued)
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarnings$66.151.42xyesNormalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $0.41B × (1−21%) / WACC 8.3% → EPV (no growth)
Residual IncomeAsset$175.270.54xyesBV $44.14 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 24.9% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$104.420.90xyes√(22.5 × EPS $10.98 × BVPS $44.14) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelative$183.320.51xyesEBITDA $0.74B × sector EV/EBITDA 13.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$88.121.07xyesFCF $451.2M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarningsno
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$354.290.27xyesEPS $10.98 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%)
ROIC-Justified P/BAsset$45.112.08xyesBV $44.14 × (ROIC 8.5% / WACC 8.3%)
P/Sales SectorRelative$39.642.37xyesRevenue $0.99B × sector P/S 2.0x
PEG Fair ValueRelative$411.750.23xyesEPS $10.98 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x
Earnings YieldEarnings$118.700.79xyesEPS $10.98 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Solvency

FieldValue
Net debt$225.2m
Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax)0.50x
Net debt / operating income (pre-tax)0.39x
Share count CAGR (dilution)0.1%
Burning cashno

Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

The capital-allocation policy is the clearest expression of the bull case, because International Seaways is built to hand the cash back. The company runs a variable-dividend model, paying out a large share of earnings rather than hoarding them, and it just declared a combined dividend of $2.15 per share for March 2026, roughly 87% of adjusted net income and the largest quarterly dividend in its history. For a cyclical business, that policy is exactly right: rather than reinvesting peak-cycle cash into expensive ships at the top of the market, management returns it to shareholders and lets them decide what to do with it. The shareholder who buys here is buying a stream of variable distributions tied directly to how much the fleet earns.

The earnings funding those distributions have been substantial. Full-year 2025 net income was $309 million, or $6.23 per diluted share, on adjusted EBITDA of $475 million, and the first quarter of 2026 alone produced net income of $286 million, or $5.75 per share. The fleet that generates this is diversified across the tanker market: 13 very large crude carriers at the big end and 38 medium-range product tankers at the smaller end, with crude and product carriers each contributing roughly half of revenue. That split matters because crude and refined-product shipping rates do not always move together, so the mix smooths the swings somewhat.

The balance sheet is the safety underneath the cyclicality. International Seaways carries a net loan-to-value ratio of just 12.9% and a net-debt-to-capital ratio of 16.5%, with 44% of the fleet unencumbered and total liquidity of $723.6 million. Net debt is only about 0.4 times a year's operating income, and interest is covered roughly 14 times over. A shipping company with that little leverage can pay out most of its earnings through the good years and still survive a downturn without distress, because it does not have heavy debt service consuming the cash when rates fall. The bull case is a low-leverage, high-payout tanker operator priced cheaply on every method, returning peak-cycle cash to shareholders rather than burning it on the fleet.

Bear Case

The question that decides everything for a tanker company is whether today's earnings are sustainable or a cycle peak, and the evidence points to peak. International Seaways earned a 58% operating margin in the trailing period, which is extraordinary and exactly what tanker operators print when charter rates spike. Those rates are set by the global balance of tanker supply and oil-shipping demand, neither of which the company controls, and they are notoriously volatile. The early signs of the turn are already in the numbers: income from vessel operations fell to $345.4 million in 2025 from $455.2 million in 2024, driven by lower average daily rates in the product-carrier fleet. When the most profitable input to the business is a spot rate that has started declining, the high current margin is a warning, not a baseline.

The supply side of the cycle is the structural threat. When tanker rates are high, shipowners order new vessels, and because ships take years to build and decades to operate, those orders arrive as new capacity that depresses rates for years afterward. The industry has a long history of converting profitable periods into oversupplied ones, and a fleet of ships is a fixed asset that keeps competing for cargo whether rates are good or bad. The company cannot shrink to match weaker demand the way an asset-light business can; the vessels exist and must be employed. That asymmetry, easy to add capacity at the top and hard to remove it at the bottom, is why tanker earnings mean-revert and often overshoot to the downside.

The valuation reflects all of this, which is both the bear's point and its limit. The stock trades around 11 times operating income, and the price implies operating profit declining about 3.5% a year, so the market is already pricing a fading cycle, and every valuation method reads the stock as cheap precisely because the methods capitalize earnings the market believes are unsustainable. The variable dividend that looks attractive at the peak shrinks with earnings: an 87% payout of a falling profit is a falling dividend, so the headline yield is not a fixed return but a cyclical one. The balance sheet is genuinely strong, so this is not a solvency bear; International Seaways will not be forced into distress. The bear case is simpler: buying a cyclical at a low multiple on peak earnings can still lose money, because the multiple is low for a reason and the earnings have further to fall than the price yet reflects.

Valuation

The price is already set for a fading cycle. At about $84 (June 27, 2026) International Seaways trades near 11 times operating income, and inverting that says the market is paying for operating profit to decline about 3.5% a year for five years. That is the key context for a tanker stock: the low multiple is not the market calling the company cheap on a steady-state basis, it is the market discounting earnings it expects to fall from a cyclical high. The 58% operating margin behind that 11-times multiple is the peak-cycle number, and the price is implicitly betting it does not last.

The methods we use to triangulate all land below the price in the sense of reading the stock as inexpensive, with the growth and relative-multiple lenses the most emphatic. Asset-based methods support the price too, which is meaningful for a shipping company because the ships are real, saleable assets, and a tanker operator trading below the value of its fleet has a tangible floor that an asset-light business lacks. But the uniformity of the cheap reading is itself the cyclical signal: when every method says a stock is cheap on trailing earnings, and those earnings sit at a cycle peak, the cheapness is the market pricing mean reversion rather than offering a free lunch. The peer cohort, other shipping and marine-transport names, trades on the same logic, so International Seaways is not an outlier; it is priced like the cyclical it is.

Solvency is the genuine strength and the reason the downside is bounded. Net debt is only about 0.4 times a year's operating income, with a net loan-to-value of 12.9%, 44% of the fleet unencumbered, and liquidity of $723.6 million. That low leverage means the company can ride a rate trough without forced asset sales or a dividend it cannot afford, and the unencumbered ships are an asset floor under the equity. What bounds the analysis is therefore not balance-sheet risk but the trajectory of charter rates: the buyer at this price is paying a low multiple for a low-leverage tanker operator with a strong fleet and a generous variable dividend, accepting that both the earnings and the dividend will rise and fall with a shipping cycle the company does not control.

Catalysts

The recent results show a still-profitable company past its rate peak. Full-year 2025 net income was $309 million, or $6.23 per diluted share, on adjusted EBITDA of $475 million, but income from vessel operations fell to $345.4 million from $455.2 million in 2024 on lower product-carrier rates. The first quarter of 2026 was strong, with net income of $286 million, or $5.75 per share, and adjusted net income of $194 million, or $3.90 per share.

The capital return is the headline catalyst. The company declared a combined dividend of $2.15 per share for March 2026, about 87% of adjusted net income and its largest quarterly dividend ever. Because the payout is tied to earnings, the dividend itself tracks the rate cycle, so each quarter's declaration is a real-time read on profitability. The events to watch are the direction of crude and product tanker rates, the order book for new vessels across the industry, which signals future supply pressure, and any fleet transactions, because for a cyclical that returns most of its cash, the rate trend and the disciplined refusal to overbuild at the top are what determine whether the high payouts continue or compress.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

Crude Tankers (reported)

Product Carriers (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

International Seaways Q4 2025 results, 8-K · International Seaways FY2025 results, 8-K · International Seaways results, 8-K · International Seaways FY2025 results, 10-K · International Seaways Q1 2026 results, 8-K

View the full interactive INSW report on boothcheck