Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $189.43, Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) is priced for today's economics sustained for ~5.5 years. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-25.
Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/ABNB
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | ABNB |
| Company | Airbnb, Inc. |
| Sector / Industry | Industrials |
| Current price | $189.43/sh |
| Composition | North America 42% / Europe, the Middle East, and Africa 39% / Latin America 9% / Asia Pacific 9% |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | whole-company |
| Operating margin (value-band context) | 12.7% |
| Operating margin today | 20.8% |
| Margin compression (value-band) | -8.1pp |
| Must persist for | 5.5y |
| Multiple paid | 40x operating income |
The operating-margin figure is value-band context at year 7: derived from the framework's value band, a separate calculation — not part of the priced-in solve.
Solve inputs: computed at a 12.4% cost of capital; growth searched up to the 50% self-funding ceiling.
How unusual the bet is: elevated (limited comparison data)
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | -0.25σ |
| cohort percentile (of 225 peers) | 92 |
Valuation X-Ray
Every valuation family lands below the price. The price therefore sits beyond what those standard frames encode.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 3.92x | 5 | expensive |
| Earnings | 2.98x | 3 | expensive |
| Relative | 2.36x | 2 | expensive |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings, Relative
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.2%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=10)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | $229.35 | 0.83x | no | FCF base $5.2B, growth 14% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 9.1%, 6yr projection |
| DCF Exit Multiple | Growth | $236.83 | 0.80x | no | Exit EV/EBITDA: 38.1x / 40.1x / 42.1x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 6yr |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $114.57 | 1.65x | yes | P/E 25.31x (blended: static sector reference 18x + trailing (TTM) 42x), scenarios: 20.9x / 25.3x / 29.7x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 20.42x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $48.33 | 3.92x | yes | BV/sh $12.96, ROE (TTM) 34.5%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $99.31 | 1.91x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $168.86 | 1.12x | no | Rev $13.2B, growth 14% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 6.6x / 8.0x / 9.4x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $54.09 | 3.50x | no | EPS $4.51, growth 1% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=31.35 (Overvalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | $41.13 | 4.61x | no | Normalized EBIT (5y avg op income, one-time charges added back) $2.06B × (1−9%) / WACC 9.1% → EPV (no growth) |
| Residual Income | Asset | $75.16 | 2.52x | yes | BV $12.96 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 34.5% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr |
| Graham Number | Asset | $36.25 | 5.23x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $4.51 × BVPS $12.96) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | $61.76 | 3.07x | yes | EBITDA $2.74B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | $94.46 | 2.01x | yes | FCF $4860.0M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | $63.66 | 2.98x | yes | SBC-adj FCF $3.15B (FCF $4.86B − SBC $1.72B) capitalized at Kₑ |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $42.32 | 4.48x | yes | EPS $4.51 × (8.5 + 2×1.4%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | $28.11 | 6.74x | yes | BV $12.96 × (ROIC 19.8% / WACC 9.1%) |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | $54.65 | 3.47x | no | Revenue $13.16B × sector P/S 2.5x |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $22.54 | 8.40x | no | EPS $4.51 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 1.4% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 2.0x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $48.73 | 3.89x | no | EPS $4.51 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)
Only one reportable economic unit is present in the current topology source. Consolidated operating lenses remain available, but there is no multi-unit decomposition.
| Unit | Role | Valuation basis | Revenue | Reported profit | Value evidence | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airbnb | operating | enterprise | 12.2B reported-currency | — | withheld | unresolved no unit value |
No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Net cash | $9.6b |
| Net debt / NOPAT (after-tax) | -3.85x (net cash) |
| Net debt / operating income (pre-tax) | -3.50x (net cash) |
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -3.3% |
| Burning cash | no |
Interest expense is not separately reported in the latest filings, so interest coverage cannot be computed.
Bullet Takeaways
- The marketplace collects guest money at booking and pays hosts at check-in, so bookings deliver cash before they deliver revenue, and Cash provided by operating activities was $4.6 billion in 2025 against property and equipment purchases of $33 million.
- The demanding part is the price, not the business: today's quote requires company-wide operating profit to compound at roughly 47.6% a year over a five-year stage, and among comparable fast-growing companies only about a quarter have kept a pace like that going that long.
- Second-quarter results land on August 6, 2026, after management raised the full-year revenue growth outlook to the low-to-mid teens and flagged roughly 100 basis points of drag on nights growth from Middle East travel disruption.
Bull Case
Most companies have to fund their own growth. Airbnb's customers fund it instead. A guest pays when they book, sometimes months ahead; the host is paid at check-in. In between, the money sits on Airbnb's balance sheet. The 10-K describes the mechanism without ceremony: The Company records guest payments, net of service fees, as funds receivable and amounts held on behalf of customers. The practical consequence is that a growing booking base throws off cash ahead of the revenue it will eventually become, which is why Cash provided by operating activities was $4.6 billion in 2025 while purchases of property and equipment came to $33 million. Almost nothing has to be reinvested to keep the machine running.
That structure explains a balance sheet with no leverage question attached to it. Airbnb carries a modest amount of funded debt against a large liquid position, generates cash rather than consuming it, and has been buying back stock under an open-ended mandate: Our board of directors has authorized management to repurchase shares of our Class A common stock at management's discretion. The share count has come down about 1.1% a year over the four years to March 2026. For a company that pays a meaningful part of its compensation bill in stock, holding the count flat would be an achievement; shrinking it is a statement about where management thinks the shares are worth owning.
The operating economics hold up against the peer set. Airbnb converts 19.4% of revenue into operating profit, which compares favourably with Expedia at 14.4% and Marriott at 16.0% on their own reported figures, though Booking Holdings remains ahead of all of them at 32.6%. The gap to Booking is not a permanent verdict. Booking runs an older, hotel-weighted book with a decade more scale in paid search. Airbnb reached comparable margins on a fraction of the sales base and did it with a brand that people type directly into a search bar rather than reach through an advertisement.
The next leg of growth costs almost nothing to build. Airbnb added experiences, which launched in May 2025, extending the same host base and the same guest base into tours, classes and services rather than only rooms. When distribution is already paid for, a new category is nearly all incremental. That is the pattern the first quarter of 2026 showed: revenue up 18% to $2.7 billion and gross booking value up 19.0% to $29.2 billion.
The best evidence for the moat comes from the people trying to compete with it. Marriott's own annual report describes Homes & Villas by Marriott Bonvoy, a global offering focusing on the premium and luxury tiers of rental homes, which is a global hotel chain deciding it needs a version of the category Airbnb invented. TripAdvisor lists Airbnb alongside General OTAs, such as Expedia, Booking, Airbnb, Traveloka, Despegar, Trip.com as a definitional competitor. Being the noun other companies build products against is the kind of position that does not show up in any line of the income statement, and it is the thing the bull case is actually buying.
Bear Case
Set the ticker aside for a moment and describe the business as it currently behaves. It is a travel marketplace with a recognisable brand, growing revenue in the teens, whose most recent full year ended with less profit than the one before. The 10-K states it plainly: In 2025, net income decreased by 5% to $2.5 billion, compared to the prior year, primarily due to an increase in compensation expense and marketing spend, as well as lower interest income. That is a description of a maturing platform whose costs are catching up with it. The price describes something else entirely, and the distance between those two descriptions is the bear case.
Three of the four ways of valuing this company land nowhere near the quote. The price sits about 215% above where the earnings-power approaches land, about 160% above the book-value-plus-profitability approaches, and about 141% above what peer multiples support. Only the cash-flow methods reach it, and the price sits roughly 23% below where they land. When a single family of method defends a price and every other family is a long way behind, the buyer is not underwriting the current business at all. They are underwriting duration.
Put a number on the duration and it gets uncomfortable. At the current quote the market pays about 34 times company-wide operating income, which requires operating profit to compound at roughly 47.6% a year across a five-year stage. Nothing in the recent record produces that. Revenue grew from $11.1 billion in 2024 to $12.2 billion in 2025 and profit went backwards over the same span. The multiple already sits at the very top of its peer group, well past the upper quartile, and among comparable fast-growing companies only about 23% ever kept a pace like that going for as long as five years.
The competitive picture is also moving the wrong way at the edges. Booking Holdings, the largest listed competitor, disclosed that The mix of Booking.com's room nights booked for alternative accommodation properties in 2025 was approximately 36%, up versus approximately 35% in 2024. That is a very large incumbent steadily taking a bigger position in the category Airbnb created, using a hotel-supply relationship Airbnb does not have. Meanwhile the top of the funnel belongs to somebody else. Airbnb's own risk disclosure concedes that it faces competition from search engines like Google, which can influence search traffic and promote their own travel services, potentially disintermediating our platform. A brand strong enough to be typed directly still depends on a distribution layer it does not control.
Regulation is the standing tax on the model. Airbnb is subject to a wide variety of laws, regulations , and rules applicable to short-term rental, experiences, services, long-term rental, and home sharing businesses, and the constraint bites at the level of individual cities, one ordinance at a time, in exactly the destinations where supply is most valuable. There is no single ruling that resolves it and no version of the business that escapes it. It is a permanent friction on supply growth in the highest-yielding markets.
None of this is a solvency argument. Airbnb has no funded-debt problem, it is not consuming cash, and the balance sheet would absorb a bad year without drama. That is precisely why the bear case has to be about the price rather than the company. A business generating billions in cash with a durable brand can still be a poor investment if the entry multiple assumes a growth rate the company has not produced recently and that most companies fail to hold. The downside here is not insolvency. It is a long period of the business doing perfectly well while the multiple comes back to the pack.
Valuation
Work backwards from the quote and the assumption becomes explicit. At a share price of $141.06 the market is paying about 34 times what the whole company earns at the operating line, and to make that arithmetic work the business needs operating profit to compound at roughly 47.6% a year through a five-year stage. Set against the sector, that multiple is not merely high; it sits at the top of the peer distribution, past the upper quartile. Set against history, only about 23% of comparable fast-growing companies ever held a pace like that for as long as five years. That is the bet, stated as plainly as it can be stated.
The answer is also sensitive to the discount rate in a way worth naming. Each additional percentage point of assumed cost of capital lifts the growth the price requires by roughly six points. The precise figure is therefore soft; the order of magnitude is not.
The methods disagree in the specific pattern that describes a durability premium rather than a mispricing. The price sits about 160% above where the book-value-plus-profitability approaches land, about 215% above the earnings-power methods, and about 141% above what peer multiples support. Only the cash-flow methods reach it. Those methods get there by starting from the free cash the business generated last year and compounding it at the pace of recent history, with an exit multiple held flat rather than compressed. Nothing in that construction is unreasonable. It simply means the entire defence of the price rests on the one family of method that is allowed to credit the future, and none of the frames that value what already exists comes close.
The peer set makes the position concrete. Booking Holdings, the largest company in the peer group, reported trailing revenue of $27.7 billion growing 15.0%, at a 32.6% operating margin. Expedia, the next peer along, reported $15.2 billion of revenue growing 10.0%. Marriott, the hotel operator in the peer group, reported $26.6 billion growing 4.7%. Airbnb is the smallest of the three on revenue and converts 19.4% of revenue into operating profit, a margin that places its economics squarely in the middle of the set. Its valuation does not sit in the middle of the set. That mismatch between mid-cohort operating performance and top-of-cohort pricing is the single most useful fact in this section.
The balance sheet does not change the arithmetic, but it does bound the consequences. Airbnb carries little funded debt against a substantial liquid position, the business generates cash rather than absorbing it, and the share count has fallen about 1.1% a year over the four years to March 2026. A company in that condition does not face the sequence where a disappointing year forces a financing decision. What it faces instead is simpler and slower: a price built on one method's forward assumption, and a business that has to keep validating that assumption every quarter for years.
Catalysts
The first quarter of 2026, reported on May 7, was strong enough that management raised the year. Revenue grew 18% to $2.7 billion, ahead of the top of the company's own guidance range, gross booking value rose 19.0% to $29.2 billion, and nights and seats booked increased 9.0% to 156 million. The gap between those two growth rates is the more interesting number. Booking value is climbing faster than booking volume, which means price per night is doing part of the work, and price per night is the component most exposed to a consumer that decides to trade down.
Guidance for the current quarter is for revenue between $3.54 billion and $3.60 billion, growth of 14% to 16%, with gross booking value up in the low double digits. Management also raised the full-year outlook, now expecting revenue growth to accelerate into the low-to-mid teens for 2026 as a whole. Set against that, the company flagged elevated cancellations tied to Middle East conflict, which it expects to cost roughly 100 basis points of nights growth in the second quarter. Travel demand has always been the first thing to move when a region becomes unattractive, and the platform's global spread is what limits the damage.
Second-quarter results are scheduled for release after the close on August 6, 2026. Two things in that report will matter more than the headline. The first is whether experiences and services, the category the company launched in May 2025, has started to register in the revenue mix rather than in the strategy section. The second is the trajectory of operating costs, since the most recent full year saw profit decline on higher compensation and marketing even as revenue grew.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Airbnb (reported)
- BKNG (Booking Holdings Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …create capacity for reinvestments in our strategic priorities for long-term value creation; and • broadening our supply and increasing flight and attraction ticket growth at Booking.com and Agoda. Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol "BKNG." We refer to our company and our…
- FY2025 10-K: …represent an increasing percentage of the properties we add to our platforms, we expect that our room-night growth rate and property growth rate will continue to diverge over time, and the number of reservations per property will likely continue to decrease. Additionally, if we don't offer features preferred by…
- EXPE (EXPEDIA GROUP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …it is not probable that we will be required to pay the supplier, based on historical experience. Cancellation fees are collected and remitted to the supplier, if applicable. Agency Hotel. We generally record agency revenue from the hotel when the stayed night occurs as we provide post booking services to the traveler…
- FY2025 10-K: …through our various media and advertising offerings across several of our transaction-based websites, as well as on our majority-owned metasearch site, trivago. For the year ended December 31, 2025, we had total revenue of $14.7 billion, with merchant, agency and advertising, media and other accounting for 70%, 22%,…
- TRIP (TRIPADVISOR, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …advertised on our platform. We earn a commission from our travel partners, based on a pre-determined contractual commission rate, for each traveler who clicks to and books a hotel reservation on the travel partner's website, which results in a traveler stay. CPA revenue is billable only upon the completion of each…
- FY2025 10-K: …new services at a relatively low cost. More specifically: • General OTAs, such as Expedia, Booking, Airbnb, Traveloka, Despegar, Trip.com, and their respective subsidiaries and operating companies; • Experiences OTAs, such as GetYourGuide, Klook, and TUI Musement; • Hotel metasearch providers, such as trivago, Kayak…
- MAR (MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC /MD/)
- FY2025 10-K: …Hilton, IHG Hotels & Resorts, Hyatt, Wyndham Hotels & Resorts, Accor, Choice Hotels, Best Western Hotels & Resorts, and others. Our direct digital channels also compete for guests with online travel 8 Table of Contents services platforms, such as Expedia.com, Priceline.com, Booking.com, Travelocity.com, Orbitz.com,…
- FY2025 10-K: …members can earn points for stays at participating properties and other travel offerings, such as Homes & Villas by Marriott Bonvoy, a global offering focusing on the premium and luxury tiers of rental homes, as well as through purchases with co-branded credit cards and our Loyalty Program partners. Members can…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Economic-unit decomposition (SOTP): each disclosed business unit is assigned its native valuation basis before any multiple is applied. Operating units are valued on enterprise value; funded financial units are valued on their own common equity, because their borrowings fund earning assets rather than levering the parent. A company total is stated only once every material unit carries a supported value and the parent capital bridge reconciles.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.
Sources
Airbnb Q1 2026 shareholder letter, May 7, 2026 · Airbnb press release, July 9, 2026