← boothcheck

SUZ vs SW stock comparison

Suzano S.A. vs Smurfit Westrock plc, two Paper & Packaging stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Two lightly indebted commodity-paper names, 0 net debt for Suzano and 0.05 for Smurfit Westrock, sit at opposite points of their cycles. Suzano is harvesting a strong pulp market, 15.44% net margin and 17.61% on equity at 3.63 times earnings. Smurfit Westrock is buried under merger costs, 1.22% and 2.1% at 65.26 times, which will ease once integration finishes. They trade near book, 1.11 times for Suzano and 1.37 times for Smurfit Westrock. Suzano's 27.86% free cash flow yield likely marks a cycle peak and deserves caution. Smurfit Westrock is far larger at $24.7B against $9.6B.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

SUZ vs SW: the numbers

MetricSUZSW
Price$8.06$44.22
Market cap$10.0B$23.3B
SectorPaper & PackagingPaper & Packaging
StageMatureGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+13.9%
P/E3.861.4
P/B1.161.29
P/S1.020.74
EV/EBITDA2.75.8
Revenue growth+7.3%+43.3%
Gross margin30.6%16.4%
Operating margin27.0%3.3%
Net margin15.4%1.2%
Return on equity17.6%2.1%
Return on assets4.6%0.8%
Return on invested capital19.1%5.6%
FCF yield26.6%4.4%
Dividend yield3.9%
Debt / equity0.000.05
Current ratio3.191.44
Altman Z (solvency)0.831.39
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 96 / 9
Full SUZ report → Full SW report →
Get boothcheck's read on SUZ and SW, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.