← boothcheck

STNG vs ZIM stock comparison

Scorpio Tankers Inc. vs ZIM INTEGRATED SHIPPING SERVICES LTD., two Marine Shipping stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Both carry cargo across oceans, Scorpio in refined petroleum products, ZIM in containers, and both ride cycles that can turn quickly. Scorpio runs the far higher net margin here, 36.7% against ZIM's 6.97%, reflecting a decent tanker window versus a soft freight one. On price they rhyme at the low end: Scorpio at 1.06 times book and 9.8 times earnings, ZIM below its own equity at 0.77 times book and 6.43 times earnings. The cash split is stark: ZIM yields 18.64% in free cash while Scorpio's yield is slightly negative at -0.6% during fleet renewal. Both carry no debt. Two cheap, debt-free cyclical carriers on different clocks.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

STNG vs ZIM: the numbers

MetricSTNGZIM
Price$79.34$23.98
Market cap$3.7B$2.9B
SectorMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
StageGrowthMature
P/E10.76.0
P/B1.150.72
P/S3.940.42
EV/EBITDA8.30.8
Revenue growth+35.8%+0.8%
Gross margin19.1%
Operating margin37.9%14.7%
Net margin36.7%7.0%
Return on equity10.8%12.0%
Return on assets8.8%4.4%
Return on invested capital8.8%18.4%
FCF yield-2.2%79.6%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio9.331.23
Altman Z (solvency)4.441.48
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 94 / 9
Full STNG report → Full ZIM report →
Get boothcheck's read on STNG and ZIM, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.