← boothcheck

RY vs WFC stock comparison

ROYAL BANK OF CANADA vs WELLS FARGO & COMPANY/MN, two Banks—Regional stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Six turns of premium sit on Royal Bank of Canada, 18.91 times earnings against Wells Fargo's 12.96, for returns the American nearly matches: 15% against 12% on equity, and 0.9% against 0.98% on assets... split, actually, with Wells ahead per asset dollar. Net margins favor RBC, 31% against 25.5%; the dividend favors Wells, 2% displayed against none shown. What the six turns buy is market structure, an oligopoly's pricing power against US retail competition, plus the absence of a scandal archive. Wells' page reads like a franchise priced for its past; RBC's like one priced for its geography. Both readings are accurate, which is what makes the spread tradeable in argument only.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

RY vs WFC: the numbers

MetricRYWFC
Price$202.84$83.88
Market cap$283.7B$261.5B
SectorFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
StageGrowthMature
P/E18.913.0
P/B2.761.45
P/S5.693.08
EV/EBITDA113.4
Revenue growth+12.1%+4.2%
Net margin31.0%25.5%
Return on equity15.0%12.0%
Return on assets0.9%1.0%
Dividend yield2.0%
Debt / equity0.001.20
Piotroski F (quality)9 / 97 / 9
Full RY report → Full WFC report →
Get boothcheck's read on RY and WFC, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.