← boothcheck

ROP vs WAT stock comparison

ROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC vs Waters Corporation, two Scientific Instruments stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

What is priced in runs through two recoveries that do not exist equally: Waters at 47.4 times earnings is priced for its negative 3.7% operating margin, one-time freight through an intact franchise, to normalize; Roper at 21.1 times is priced as if nothing about its 27.2% operating margin and 7.4% free-cash yield deserved a premium. The pair is the sector's oddest ordering: the business needing repair costs more than twice as much per dollar of earnings as the one needing nothing. Waters' 11.9% net margin shows the underlying franchise still earning; Roper's 69.4% gross margin shows a software estate wearing an instruments label. Patience is being sold at a premium and performance at a discount.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

ROP vs WAT: the numbers

MetricROPWAT
Price$338.37$374.11
Market cap$35.4B$30.7B
SectorScientific InstrumentsScientific Instruments
StageMatureGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)-0.5%
P/E21.147.4
P/B1.882.01
P/S4.368.09
EV/EBITDA19.954.6
Revenue growth+12.1%+28.6%
Gross margin69.4%
Operating margin27.2%-3.7%
Net margin21.1%11.9%
Return on equity9.1%3.0%
Return on assets5.0%1.8%
Return on invested capital6.2%2.4%
FCF yield7.4%1.1%
Dividend yield1.0%
Debt / equity0.560.32
Current ratio0.531.79
Altman Z (solvency)2.302.82
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 93 / 9
Full ROP report → Full WAT report →
Get boothcheck's read on ROP and WAT, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.