← boothcheck

PCAR vs TM stock comparison

PACCAR Inc vs TOYOTA MOTOR CORP/, two Auto Manufacturers stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Toyota and PACCAR are both disciplined, profitable vehicle makers, one in passenger cars and one in heavy trucks, but the market prices them very differently: Toyota at 7.17 times earnings, PACCAR at 25.7. Toyota earns the higher net margin, 9.97% against 8.91%, and return on equity, 13% against 12.5%, near-matched on both, yet trades at less than a third of PACCAR's multiple. Both run debt-free (ex-finance). Toyota yields more free cash, 10.8% against 5.89%. The pair prices a global car giant against a heavy-truck specialist; their profitability is remarkably similar, but Toyota trades cheap on Japanese-auto sentiment while PACCAR commands a US-industrial premium, making Toyota the clear value on nearly matched economics.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

PCAR vs TM: the numbers

MetricPCARTM
Price$120.75$171.77
Market cap$63.7B$227.6B
SectorAuto ManufacturersAuto Manufacturers
StageMatureGrowth
Implied growth (priced in)+23.3%
P/E25.77.2
P/B3.220.93
P/S2.290.71
EV/EBITDA77.43.6
Revenue growth-14.0%+15.4%
Operating margin10.0%
Net margin8.9%10.0%
Return on equity12.5%13.0%
Return on assets5.7%5.1%
Return on invested capital9.7%
FCF yield5.9%10.8%
Dividend yield2.3%8.5%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.26
Altman Z (solvency)7.251.68
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 96 / 9
Full PCAR report → Full TM report →
Get boothcheck's read on PCAR and TM, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.