THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY vs THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, two Commercial Printing stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where NYT and TRI diverge most: on current ratio, NYT reads 1.60 and TRI reads 0.64; on revenue growth, NYT reads +10.4% and TRI reads +4.2%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's NYT price has a different growth bar priced in than TRI (+16.8% implied for NYT vs +13.7% for TRI); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What NYT's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | NYT | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $74.92 | $98.14 |
| Market cap | $12.3B | $44.1B |
| Sector | Commercial Printing | Commercial Printing |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +16.8% | +13.7% |
| P/E | 32.1 | 29.4 |
| P/B | 6.13 | 3.70 |
| P/S | 4.23 | 5.89 |
| EV/EBITDA | 24.9 | 20.4 |
| Revenue growth | +10.4% | +4.2% |
| Operating margin | 12.7% | 28.5% |
| Net margin | 13.2% | 20.1% |
| Return on equity | 19.1% | 12.6% |
| Return on assets | 13.4% | 8.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.7% | 14.1% |
| FCF yield | 4.4% | 4.6% |
| Dividend yield | 1.0% | — |
| Debt / equity | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.60 | 0.64 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 8.54 | 5.83 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 7 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.