← boothcheck

NWS vs TRI stock comparison

NEWS CORPORATION vs THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, two Commercial Printing stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Where NWS and TRI diverge most: on fcf yield, NWS reads -3.0% and TRI reads 4.6%; on debt / equity, NWS reads 0.21 and TRI reads 0.00. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's NWS price has a different growth bar priced in than TRI (+11.3% implied for NWS vs +13.7% for TRI); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.

NWS vs TRI: the numbers

MetricNWSTRI
Price$31.27$98.14
Market cap$17.4B$44.1B
SectorCommercial PrintingCommercial Printing
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+11.3%+13.7%
P/E15.629.4
P/B1.873.70
P/S1.975.89
EV/EBITDA43.020.4
Revenue growth+4.3%+4.2%
Operating margin28.5%
Net margin12.9%20.1%
Return on equity12.3%12.6%
Return on assets7.3%8.4%
Return on invested capital14.1%
FCF yield-3.0%4.6%
Dividend yield0.6%
Debt / equity0.210.00
Current ratio1.700.64
Altman Z (solvency)6.675.83
Piotroski F (quality)4 / 97 / 9
Full NWS report → Full TRI report →
Get boothcheck's read on NWS and TRI, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.