NEWS CORPORATION vs THOMSON REUTERS CORPORATION, two Commercial Printing stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
News Corp publishes news and owns real-estate listings; Thomson Reuters sells professional information and analytics to legal, tax, and business customers. Thomson Reuters earns the fatter margin, 20.09% against News Corp's 12.92%, on a similar return near 12%, and trades far dearer, 25.13 times earnings against News Corp's 14.26, and at 3.16 times book against 1.72. This contrasts a consumer-and-property media company with a professional-information provider: Thomson Reuters earns richer margins on subscription data at a premium multiple, News Corp trades cheaply on its more cyclical publishing and listings mix.
Comparison updated 2026-07-11.
| Metric | NWS | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $30.92 | $89.61 |
| Market cap | $17.2B | $40.2B |
| Sector | Commercial Printing | Commercial Printing |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | — | +8.9% |
| P/E | 15.4 | 26.8 |
| P/B | 1.85 | 3.38 |
| P/S | 1.95 | 5.38 |
| EV/EBITDA | 35.6 | 18.6 |
| Revenue growth | +4.3% | +4.2% |
| Operating margin | — | 28.5% |
| Net margin | 12.9% | 20.1% |
| Return on equity | 12.3% | 12.6% |
| Return on assets | 7.3% | 8.4% |
| Return on invested capital | — | 14.1% |
| FCF yield | -3.1% | 5.0% |
| Dividend yield | 0.7% | — |
| Debt / equity | 0.21 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.70 | 0.64 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 6.67 | 5.45 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 4 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.