← boothcheck

GPC vs RS stock comparison

GENUINE PARTS CO vs RELIANCE, INC., two Distribution stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Genuine Parts distributes auto and industrial parts, Reliance metals, and the two earn comparable returns through different models. Genuine Parts's 20.79% return on equity beats Reliance's 11.28%, though on a thinner margin, 3.78% against 5.42%. Genuine Parts is the income name, yielding 3.55% against Reliance's 1.24%, but carries more debt, 1.03 turns against 0.24. Reliance trades dearer, 25.1 times earnings against 17.2, and converts similar free cash. The pair contrasts a dividend-rich auto-parts distributor with a metals service-center operator: Genuine Parts offers higher returns and a bigger yield but more leverage, Reliance a cleaner balance sheet and a steadier asset base, weighing income against balance-sheet safety.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

GPC vs RS: the numbers

MetricGPCRS
Price$116.01$385.59
Market cap$16.0B$20.0B
SectorDistributionDistribution
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)-1.0%+10.5%
P/E17.225.1
P/B3.562.81
P/S0.651.35
EV/EBITDA37.315.5
Revenue growth+4.8%+8.7%
Gross margin37.3%
Operating margin9.1%
Net margin3.8%5.4%
Return on equity20.8%11.3%
Return on assets4.5%7.4%
Return on invested capital9.5%
FCF yield3.4%3.0%
Dividend yield3.5%1.2%
Debt / equity1.030.24
Current ratio1.094.39
Altman Z (solvency)7.546.08
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 95 / 9
Full GPC report → Full RS report →
Get boothcheck's read on GPC and RS, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.