GENUINE PARTS CO (GPC): what the price assumes

In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $137.51, GENUINE PARTS CO (GPC) is priced for -2.4% growth. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-07-26.

Generated: 2026-08-30 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/GPC

Headline

FieldValue
TickerGPC
CompanyGENUINE PARTS CO
Sector / IndustryIndustrials
Current price$137.51/sh
CompositionNorth America - Automotive 39% / North America - Industrial 35% / Australasia - Automotive 8% / Australasia - Industrial 2% / Europe - Automotive 17%

What The Price Assumes (Inversion)

The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.

FieldValue
Inversion basiswhole-company
Implied growth-2.4%
Multiple paid18x operating income

Solve inputs: computed at a 7% cost of capital with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage (computed at the 7% minimum rate; the CAPM rate 6.8% sits below it).

How unusual the bet is: within-range (limited comparison data)

ReferenceValue
vs own history-1.11σ
cohort percentile (of 225 peers)40

Valuation X-Ray

Asset, earnings-power and peer-multiple models all land far below the price; ONLY the growth-DCF reaches it. The bet is durable compounding the static frames structurally cannot price (a moat/durability premium).

How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.

FamilyMedian price/FVModelsReads
Asset1.65x4expensive
Earnings10.50x3expensive
Relative0
Growth1.24x3expensive

Families that justify the price: Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset, Earnings

The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 7.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.

Per-Model Detail (n=10)

ModelFamilyFVPrice/FVApplicableMethodology
DCF Perpetual GrowthGrowth$108.421.27xyesFCF base $0.8B, growth 5% (input: historical growth), terminal g 4.0%, WACC 7.9%, 5yr projection
DCF Exit MultipleGrowth$136.621.01xyesExit EV/EBITDA: 42.9x / 44.9x / 46.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull), 5yr
Relative ValuationRelativenoP/E 18x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 15.1x / 18.0x / 20.9x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 21.86x
Simple DDMGrowthno
Two-Stage DDMGrowth$-30.65noStage 1: -189% for 5yr, Stage 2: 3.5% perpetual
Simple Excess ReturnAsset$71.111.93xyesBV/sh $32.83, ROE (TTM) 20.0%, ke 9.3%
Two-Stage Excess ReturnAsset$103.591.33xyes5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3%
Discounted Future Market CapGrowth$111.201.24xyesRev $25.1B, growth 5% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.6x / 0.8x / 0.9x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x)
Growth-Adjusted P/ERelativeno
Margin TrajectoryGrowthno
Earnings Power ValueEarningsno
Residual IncomeAsset$100.161.37xyesBV $32.83 + 5yr PV of (ROE (TTM) 20.0% − Kₑ 9.3%) × BV; BV grows 8.8%/yr
Graham NumberAsset$69.601.98xyes√(22.5 × EPS $6.56 × BVPS $32.83) — Graham's conservative floor
EV/EBITDA RelativeRelativenoEBITDA $0.57B × sector EV/EBITDA 12.0x
FCF YieldEarnings$13.1010.50xyesFCF $759.4M / Kₑ 9.3% — zero-growth perpetuity
SBC-Adj FCF YieldEarnings$8.8415.56xyesSBC-adj FCF $0.70B (FCF $0.76B − SBC $0.05B) capitalized at Kₑ
Ben Graham FormulaEarnings$5.5025.00xyesEPS $6.56 × (8.5 + 2×-5.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) (excluded from median)
ROIC-Justified P/BAssetno
P/Sales SectorRelativenoRevenue $25.07B × sector P/S 2.5x
PEG Fair ValueRelativeno
Earnings YieldEarnings$70.891.94xyesEPS $6.56 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%)
Funds From Operations MultipleRelativeno
Clinical Phase NPVGrowthno
MertonAssetno
V5 Mechanicalno

Economic-Unit Decomposition (Sum Of The Parts)

One or more material disclosed units has unresolved economics. Unknown/general is not evidence of homogeneity: segment SOTP is primary but incomplete, consolidated cash flow may remain only a secondary cross-check when every unit shares an enterprise basis, and one sector multiple or target margin is withheld.

UnitRoleValuation basisRevenueReported profitValue evidenceStatus
North America Automotiveoperatingenterprise$9.5bwithheldunresolved no unit value
International Automotiveoperatingenterprise$5.9bwithheldunresolved no unit value
Industrialoperatingenterprise$8.9bwithheldunresolved no unit value

No total common-equity value is stated. One or more material units lack a supported unit value. The displayed values are an indicative subtotal; consolidated debt and cash cannot be applied to a fraction of the company.

Solvency

FieldValue
Share count CAGR (buyback)-0.8%
Burning cashno

Operating profit is negative or near zero and the company has no demonstrated through-cycle (mid-cycle) operating margin to normalize against, so years-to-repay cannot be computed honestly.

Operating profit is negative or near zero and there is no demonstrated through-cycle (mid-cycle) operating margin to normalize against, so interest coverage cannot be computed honestly.

Bullet Takeaways

Bull Case

Today's quote embeds a business in slow retreat. Inverted, it asks company-wide operating profit to shrink by roughly 1.2% a year over the next five years, and against its sector the multiple sits in the lower half of the peer range. That is a market assuming the parts distribution model has seen its best years. The June 2026 quarter argues otherwise, and it does so segment by segment.

North America Automotive earned $208.3 million on the company's segment measure in the three months to June 30, 2026, against $196.5 million a year earlier. International Automotive earned $150.0 million against $141.5 million. Industrial, the biggest profit contributor, earned $316.4 million against $288.1 million. Over six months Industrial alone moved from $566.8 million to $630.6 million. Three segments, three improvements, in a year when the consolidated result went the other way.

The gap between those two facts sits in the corporate line, and the filing is unusually candid about where it should be: "Our operational objective is to maintain Corporate EBITDA within a range of 1.5% to 2.0% of net sales." Corporate ran a loss of $107.8 million in the June quarter against $78.6 million a year before, and unallocated costs went from $45.7 million to $92.6 million. Inside that second figure are $76.4 million of restructuring and $16.2 million of separation costs. Those are the expenses of a company preparing to stop being one company. They have an end date.

That end date is the thesis. The separation is targeted for the first quarter of 2027, intended to qualify as tax-free for shareholders, and the filing states flatly that "Our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related footnotes do not reflect the proposed separation." The two halves earn very differently. In 2025 the Industrial segment ran a 12.9% segment margin while North America Automotive ran 7.1% and International Automotive 9.3%. A blended multiple on a blended business is the only honest way to price that today. Two separate businesses get two separate comparison sets, and industrial distributors are not valued the way automotive parts networks are.

Underneath the reorganisation the machine keeps turning. Operating activities produced $464.1 million in the first half of 2026 against $169.1 million in the same months of 2025, while capital spending fell to $205.4 million from $248.8 million. The physical base behind that is 193 distribution centres and 4,558 stores and branches worldwide. Replacing a network like that is not a matter of capital; it is a matter of decades.

The honest concession is growth. Net sales rose 3.5% in 2025, of which 2.2 points came from acquisitions and 0.9 points from comparable sales, with roughly 2 points of price inflation inside the comparable figure. Volume, in other words, is flat. But a distributor is not paid to grow fast. It is paid to hold margin and keep paying out, and on the second count the record is close to unmatched: "We have paid a cash dividend to shareholders every year since going public in 1948 and increased the annual dividend for 69 consecutive years through 2025." A company does not build a streak like that by accident, and it does not casually break one.

Bear Case

The annual report names its rivals without softening the list: "Key competitors in North America include AutoZone, Inc., O'Reilly Auto Parts, Inc., Advance Auto Parts, Inc., and LKQ Corporation, among others." Two of those four are pulling away. ORLY grew revenue 7.9% year over year at a 19.6% operating margin, and AZO grew 5.7% at 18.0%. Genuine Parts grew net sales 3.5% in 2025 with less than a point of it coming from comparable sales. The fourth name shows what the losing end of this market looks like: AAP shrank 3.1% at a 1.8% operating margin.

Distribution defends itself with scale and availability rather than with brand, and the filing concedes the structure: "Our Global Automotive and Industrial businesses operate in highly competitive markets, with a wide range of national, regional and local businesses." Fixed networks reward throughput. Every point of share that moves to a specialty chain or an online seller takes volume out of a cost base that does not shrink to match, which is why a low-single-digit sales gap turns into a much larger profitability gap over time.

Counterparty exposure is the second problem, and it stopped being theoretical last year. The risk section warns that "Our results of operations, revenue, and supply chain could be materially affected as a result of a bankruptcy, insolvency or other credit failures of a significant customer or vendor." Then First Brands Group filed for Chapter 11, and the company booked $151 million of credit losses on it, with cash performance separately hurt by First Brands failing to remit payments owed.

That was not the only discrete charge. In 2025 net non-operating expenses reached $908 million against $53 million a year earlier, driven by a $742 million charge to settle the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan, and joined by $103 million of asbestos-related product liability remeasurement. Most of that is genuinely one-time. One piece is not: net interest expense rose $67 million in 2025 and kept rising, reaching $45.8 million in the June 2026 quarter against $40.2 million a year earlier. Borrowing to fund a network upgrade while the operating engine slows leaves the interest behind after the investment ends.

Here the bear runs into an awkward fact, which is that expectations are already low. The quote embeds operating profit falling about 1.2% a year, so there is no heroic assumption to knock down. The real risk is the shape of the decline rather than its existence. Two things could steepen it. The separation could cost more and deliver less than planned, leaving a permanently heavier corporate base split across two smaller companies. Or the industrial cycle could turn, and Industrial is where the profit lives: $1,146.4 million of segment earnings in 2025 against $672.2 million from North America Automotive. In that comparison set GWW grew revenue 6.6% and FAST grew 10.9% last year, while GPC's Industrial segment grew its own profit measure 4.0% over the same span. Faster-growing rivals in the segment that carries the company is not a comfortable place to be entering a split.

And the split itself is an assumption. The filing is careful to say so: "There can be no assurance that any separation transaction will ultimately occur or, if one does occur, of its terms or timing." Between now and the first quarter of 2027, holders own the costs of the transaction with none of the benefits.

Valuation

Most reports of this kind begin with a demanding assumption. This one begins with the opposite. Inverted, the current quote of $124.18 embeds company-wide operating profit shrinking about 1.2% a year over five years, computed on a 7% cost of capital with 4% long-run growth thereafter. That reading is sensitive in magnitude, since one percentage point on the discount rate moves the required growth by roughly 7.7 points, but the direction is what matters here: the market is not asking this business to get better.

Set that against two references. Measured against the company's own recent record, a pace like that sits inside what it has already delivered, so the stretch is in how long it has to persist rather than in the rate itself. Measured against its sector, the multiple sits in the lower half of the peer range. Neither reference makes the requirement look heroic, which is the whole character of the situation.

The methods cluster tightly, which is unusual and informative. The quote sits about 1.45 times above where the asset-value methods settle, about 1.25 times above the cash-flow methods, and about 1.7 times above the earnings-power read, while peer-multiple approaches land above the quote entirely. Nothing is far away in either direction. That is the profile of a mature distributor carrying a modest premium, not a stretched one.

The earnings-power read deserves a caveat, and the caveat is its input. A twelve-month profit figure for this company currently includes a $742 million pension settlement charge, $151 million of credit losses from the First Brands bankruptcy and $103 million of asbestos-related remeasurement, all landing in the same year. Whatever a no-growth capitalisation of that figure produces, it describes a year with a pension plan termination in it, not the earning capacity of a parts network.

The segment table is the more honest read on what the business earns. In 2025 Industrial produced $1,146.4 million of segment earnings on a 12.9% margin, North America Automotive $672.2 million on 7.1%, and International Automotive $544.2 million on 9.3%, against a corporate drag of $357.2 million. By the June 2026 quarter all three had moved up, to $316.4 million, $208.3 million and $150.0 million respectively. Two of those numbers describe an industrial distributor. The other two describe an automotive parts network earning roughly half the margin. Today they share one multiple.

The funding side is unremarkable in the good sense. Long-term borrowings stood at 3.977 billion dollars on June 30, 2026, with 250.0 million dollars falling due inside the year, against shareholders' equity of 4.526 billion dollars. Net interest expense of $45.8 million in the June quarter sat against segment earnings several times that size. Operating activities produced $464.1 million in the first half against $205.4 million of capital spending, and the share count has drifted down by roughly 0.9% a year since early 2022.

The most consequential item in the file is a date rather than a number. Until the first quarter of 2027, the statements describe one company containing two sets of economics: an industrial distributor earning double-digit segment margins and an automotive network earning about half that, priced together on a single multiple that fits neither of them exactly.

Catalysts

The separation is the calendar. Genuine Parts announced on February 17, 2026 that it intends to divide into Global Automotive and Global Industrial, with completion targeted for the first quarter of 2027 and the transaction intended to qualify as tax-free for shareholders. Separation costs have already begun to appear as a distinct line, $16.2 million in the June quarter and $33.7 million across the first half, alongside $134.2 million of restructuring costs over the same six months. Each subsequent quarterly report should carry more detail on how the two balance sheets get divided, which is the detail that matters most and the one not yet disclosed.

Second-quarter results were reported on July 21, 2026, with sales of $6.5 billion. Three days earlier the company said publicly that it was not in deal talks, following press reports of a possible acquisition. The sell side moved in both directions on July 24, 2026: Raymond James raised its target to $165 from $145 with a Strong Buy rating and Evercore ISI raised to $150 from $145 at Outperform, while UBS cut to $122 from $125 at Neutral and Truist nudged to $126 from $124 at Hold. A spread that wide across four desks on the same day is itself the story: nobody agrees on what the two halves are worth apart.

The income stream continues in the meantime. The quarterly dividend went up 3% in 2025, extending a run the annual report describes as 69 consecutive years of increases through 2025, and the most recent ex-dividend date was June 5, 2026. For a shareholder waiting out a separation that will not complete before 2027, the payout is what makes the wait tolerable.

Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)

North America Automotive / International Automotive (reported)

Industrial (reported)

Methodology Note

Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.

Sources

Q2 2026 Form 10-Q · FY2025 Form 10-K · Q2 2026 earnings release, July 21, 2026 · company statement, July 18, 2026 · analyst notes dated July 24, 2026 · FY2025 Form 10-K; dividend calendar

View the full interactive GPC report on boothcheck