← boothcheck

GIL vs LULU stock comparison

GILDAN ACTIVEWEAR INC. vs lululemon athletica inc., two Apparel stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Gildan cranks out blank basics for wholesale; Lululemon designs premium athletic wear it sells at full price. Lululemon is far more profitable, a 13.03% net margin and 30.25% return on equity against Gildan's 11.02% and 11.2%. Yet the market prices Lululemon at just 9.51 times earnings, cheaper than Gildan's 20.26, after souring on its growth. Both run debt-free. Lululemon yields 9.43% in free cash flow, Gildan 6.18%. Lululemon's 2.81 times book edges Gildan's 2.27. The stronger business trades at the lower multiple here, a reversal of the usual order between a brand and its plainer supplier.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

GIL vs LULU: the numbers

MetricGILLULU
Price$52.51$119.23
Market cap$8.0B$13.8B
SectorApparelApparel
StageMatureMature
Implied growth (priced in)+13.2%
P/E20.19.7
P/B2.262.85
P/S2.221.23
EV/EBITDA10.15.4
Revenue growth+5.6%+4.7%
Gross margin31.2%54.2%
Operating margin17.1%11.2%
Net margin11.0%13.0%
Return on equity11.2%30.3%
Return on assets3.8%17.1%
Return on invested capital14.6%28.9%
FCF yield6.2%9.3%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio2.112.23
Altman Z (solvency)1.684.67
Piotroski F (quality)5 / 95 / 9
Full GIL report → Full LULU report →
Get boothcheck's read on GIL and LULU, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.