← boothcheck

GIB vs STN stock comparison

CGI INC. vs STANTEC INC., two Consulting stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Two debt-free service firms, and the market still prices them a world apart: Stantec at 22.4 times earnings, CGI at 11.8. The clean balance sheets rule out financial distress as the explanation, which leaves the revenue bases. Stantec designs infrastructure into a public-spending tailwind; CGI runs IT estates into an AI headwind, or at least a market convinced of one. The operating facts favor the cheaper firm: CGI's 11.5% net margin nearly doubles Stantec's 5.9%, and its 10.5% free-cash yield beats 8%. Returns on assets, 10.1% against 6%, agree. Every measured thing points one way and the multiple points the other; the difference is a story about the future of billable work.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

GIB vs STN: the numbers

MetricGIBSTN
Price$64.43$69.32
Market cap$14.7B$7.9B
SectorConsultingConsulting
StageMatureGrowth
P/E11.822.4
P/B2.123.32
P/S1.361.32
Revenue growth+4.9%+15.6%
Net margin11.5%5.9%
Return on equity17.9%14.8%
Return on assets10.1%6.0%
FCF yield10.5%8.0%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio1.361.23
Altman Z (solvency)3.222.47
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 97 / 9
Full GIB report → Full STN report →
Get boothcheck's read on GIB and STN, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.