AECOM vs STANTEC INC., two Consulting stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where ACM and STN diverge most: on revenue growth, ACM reads -4.1% and STN reads +15.6%; on debt / equity, ACM reads 0.03 and STN reads 0.00. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's ACM price has a different growth bar priced in than STN (+7.9% implied for ACM vs +4.0% for STN); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What ACM's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | ACM | STN |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $63.48 | $69.67 |
| Market cap | $8.2B | $7.9B |
| Sector | Consulting | Consulting |
| Stage | Mature | Growth |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +7.9% | +4.0% |
| P/E | 29.1 | 22.6 |
| P/B | 3.40 | 3.34 |
| P/S | 0.53 | 1.33 |
| EV/EBITDA | 10.6 | — |
| Revenue growth | -4.1% | +15.6% |
| Gross margin | -0.9% | — |
| Operating margin | -2.1% | — |
| Net margin | 1.9% | 5.9% |
| Return on equity | 12.0% | 14.8% |
| Return on assets | 2.4% | 6.0% |
| Return on invested capital | 20.3% | — |
| FCF yield | 2.5% | 8.0% |
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.06 | 1.23 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 1.62 | 2.48 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 4 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.