AECOM vs CGI INC., two Consulting stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
CGI earns its money the way software-services firms do, keeping 11.5 cents of each revenue dollar and 18% on equity with no debt; AECOM earns its 20% on equity from a 3.2% net margin, the pass-through arithmetic of engineering work where most of each dollar goes straight back out to subcontractors and staff. Structurally, CGI's return is earned on margin, AECOM's on velocity. The market prices the difference plainly: CGI at 11.8 times earnings with a 10.5% free-cash yield, AECOM at 18.5 times with 4.5%. A buyer here is choosing between a cheaper compounding machine and a dearer order book.
Comparison updated 2026-07-10.
| Metric | ACM | GIB |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $71.01 | $64.43 |
| Market cap | $9.2B | $14.7B |
| Sector | Consulting | Consulting |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | -2.3% | — |
| P/E | 18.5 | 11.8 |
| P/B | 3.71 | 2.12 |
| P/S | 0.57 | 1.36 |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.8 | — |
| Revenue growth | -0.4% | +4.9% |
| Gross margin | 7.8% | — |
| Operating margin | 6.5% | — |
| Net margin | 3.2% | 11.5% |
| Return on equity | 20.4% | 17.9% |
| Return on assets | 4.2% | 10.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 34.7% | — |
| FCF yield | 4.5% | 10.5% |
| Debt / equity | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| Current ratio | 1.11 | 1.36 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 1.87 | 3.22 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 6 / 9 | 6 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.