← boothcheck

FANG vs WDS stock comparison

Diamondback Energy, Inc. vs Woodside Energy Group Ltd, two Oil & Gas stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The margin comparison is muddied on one side: Diamondback's Endeavor-acquisition costs crush its trailing 1.87% net margin, while Woodside prints a clean 21.1% on Australian LNG, so free cash is the fairer lens, Diamondback's 16.2% against Woodside's 20%, both prodigious. Diamondback is the Permian's largest pure play post-Endeavor; Woodside a long-life LNG developer. Both run debt-free; Woodside yields more cash and offers Asian-gas exposure, Diamondback US oil scale. Woodside trades at 13.2 times earnings, Diamondback's P/E is meaningless this year. The pair prices Permian oil against Australian LNG; both are cash-rich resource plays, and Diamondback must be read on its 16% cash yield, not its acquisition-distorted trailing earnings.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

FANG vs WDS: the numbers

MetricFANGWDS
Price$179.74$18.95
Market cap$50.8B$35.9B
SectorOil & GasOil & Gas
StageCyclicalCyclical
Implied growth (priced in)+6.6%
P/E183.413.2
P/B1.190.90
P/S3.342.77
EV/EBITDA13.17.8
Revenue growth+23.1%+29.4%
Gross margin34.9%
Operating margin2.7%29.9%
Net margin1.9%21.1%
Return on equity0.7%6.9%
Return on assets0.4%4.1%
Return on invested capital-0.4%7.8%
FCF yield16.2%20.0%
Dividend yield2.2%
Debt / equity0.330.00
Current ratio0.561.59
Altman Z (solvency)1.391.27
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 95 / 9
Full FANG report → Full WDS report →
Get boothcheck's read on FANG and WDS, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.