← boothcheck

CNQ vs FANG stock comparison

CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED vs Diamondback Energy, Inc., two Oil & Gas stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Diamondback's trailing earnings are crushed by Endeavor-acquisition integration costs, its 183 P/E and 0.67% return on equity artifacts of a one-time charge rather than the business, so free cash is the honest lens: Diamondback yields 16.2%, Canadian Natural 13.5%, both prodigious. Canadian Natural nets 27.9% of revenue on oil-sands economics; Diamondback's normalized margins are Permian-strong beneath the acquisition noise. Diamondback pays a 2.2% dividend and carries 0.33 turns of debt; Canadian Natural runs debt-free. The pair prices oil-sands longevity against Permian scale (Diamondback now the basin's largest pure play post-Endeavor); read Diamondback on its cash yield, not its distorted trailing earnings.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

CNQ vs FANG: the numbers

MetricCNQFANG
Price$39.49$179.74
Market cap$82.6B$50.8B
SectorOil & GasOil & Gas
StageCyclicalCyclical
Implied growth (priced in)+6.6%
P/E10.4183.4
P/B2.531.19
P/S2.903.34
EV/EBITDA11.913.1
Revenue growth+8.4%+23.1%
Operating margin2.7%
Net margin27.9%1.9%
Return on equity24.4%0.7%
Return on assets11.8%0.4%
Return on invested capital-0.4%
FCF yield13.4%16.2%
Dividend yield2.2%
Debt / equity0.000.33
Current ratio0.950.56
Altman Z (solvency)2.341.39
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 98 / 9
Full CNQ report → Full FANG report →
Get boothcheck's read on CNQ and FANG, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.