← boothcheck

CNQ vs WDS stock comparison

CANADIAN NATURAL RESOURCES LIMITED vs Woodside Energy Group Ltd, two Oil & Gas stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

Economically these are two long-life resource producers on different continents and molecules: Canadian Natural's oil sands against Woodside's Australian LNG. Canadian Natural earns the far higher return on equity, 24.4% against 6.87%, and nets more, 27.9% against 21.1%, oil-sands cash economics beating LNG's capital-heavy development returns this cycle. Both run debt-free. Woodside yields more free cash, 20% against 13.5%, and both trade near 10-13 times earnings. The pair prices Canadian oil against Australian gas, two long-duration resource plays; Canadian Natural's barrels earn triple Woodside's return on equity, Woodside's LNG offers the fatter cash yield and Asian-demand exposure, and the market prices both as cheap, cash-rich resource holdings.

Comparison updated 2026-07-11.

CNQ vs WDS: the numbers

MetricCNQWDS
Price$39.49$18.95
Market cap$82.6B$35.9B
SectorOil & GasOil & Gas
StageCyclicalCyclical
P/E10.413.2
P/B2.530.90
P/S2.902.77
EV/EBITDA11.97.8
Revenue growth+8.4%+29.4%
Gross margin34.9%
Operating margin29.9%
Net margin27.9%21.1%
Return on equity24.4%6.9%
Return on assets11.8%4.1%
Return on invested capital7.8%
FCF yield13.4%20.0%
Debt / equity0.000.00
Current ratio0.951.59
Altman Z (solvency)2.341.27
Piotroski F (quality)8 / 95 / 9
Full CNQ report → Full WDS report →
Get boothcheck's read on CNQ and WDS, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.