EQT CORPORATION vs Diamondback Energy, Inc., two Oil & Gas stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where EQT and FANG diverge most: on return on invested capital, EQT reads 9.0% and FANG reads -0.4%; on p/e, EQT reads 12.4 and FANG reads 207.1. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. What EQT's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | EQT | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $53.28 | $203.00 |
| Market cap | $33.5B | $57.4B |
| Sector | Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas |
| Stage | Cyclical | Cyclical |
| P/E | 12.4 | 207.1 |
| P/B | 1.16 | 1.35 |
| P/S | 3.51 | 3.77 |
| EV/EBITDA | 5.8 | 14.4 |
| Revenue growth | +41.1% | +23.1% |
| Operating margin | 21.8% | 2.7% |
| Net margin | 28.4% | 1.9% |
| Return on equity | 9.4% | 0.7% |
| Return on assets | 6.6% | 0.4% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.0% | -0.4% |
| FCF yield | 11.2% | 14.3% |
| Dividend yield | 1.2% | 2.0% |
| Debt / equity | 0.20 | 0.33 |
| Current ratio | 0.67 | 0.56 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 2.05 | 1.53 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 6 / 9 | 8 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.