← boothcheck

CSCO vs STX stock comparison

CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. vs Seagate Technology Holdings plc, two Computer Hardware stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

One sells the network, the other sells the shelves it fills. Cisco is an installed-base franchise, 63.6% gross margins, a 25% operating margin it earns in most conditions, and a 1.4% dividend; Seagate is a drive manufacturer whose 32.1% operating margin marks the crest of a storage cycle, with a 217% return on equity that is purely the arithmetic of 3.5 turns of leverage on a sliver of equity (the 26.7% return on assets is the honest number). The multiples price the temperature difference backwards from habit: 85.1 times the cyclical, 37.7 times the franchise. That ordering embeds a specific belief, that AI data growth has made drive demand structural. The pair is where that belief can be checked against a price.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CSCO vs STX: the numbers

MetricCSCOSTX
Price$113.45$896.74
Market cap$451.8B$205.4B
SectorComputer HardwareComputer Hardware
StageMatureGrowth
P/E37.785.1
P/B9.25187.54
P/S7.4418.65
EV/EBITDA33.865.5
Revenue growth+9.2%+29.1%
Gross margin63.6%
Operating margin25.0%32.1%
Net margin19.7%21.6%
Return on equity24.5%217.2%
Return on assets9.5%26.7%
Return on invested capital14.2%54.2%
FCF yield2.6%1.2%
Dividend yield1.4%0.3%
Debt / equity0.713.53
Current ratio0.921.33
Altman Z (solvency)4.106.66
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 97 / 9
Full CSCO report → Full STX report →
Get boothcheck's read on CSCO and STX, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.