← boothcheck

CNO vs OSCR stock comparison

CNO Financial Group, Inc. vs Oscar Health, Inc., two Managed Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

CNO Financial carries no debt and underwrites seniors' life and supplemental policies the way it has for decades; Oscar Health carries little debt and is still proving individual-market insurance can profit at all, its 15.2% operating margin netting out to a loss. The balance sheets are both clean, which isolates the maturity gap: CNO earns a 5.4% net margin and pays a 1.3% dividend at 21.1 times earnings; Oscar has no multiple and a 28.5% free-cash figure that is premium float, not distributable cash. Returns on equity, 9.8% against negative 2.4%, complete the contrast. The pair prices insurance's two life stages, habit and hypothesis, and for once the habit trades at the more demanding valuation.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CNO vs OSCR: the numbers

MetricCNOOSCR
Price$52.52$29.79
Market cap$5.0B$9.8B
SectorManaged CareManaged Care
StageMatureGrowth
P/E21.1
P/B2.025.89
P/S1.120.74
EV/EBITDA7.6309.2
Revenue growth+5.0%+30.5%
Operating margin12.6%15.2%
Net margin5.4%-0.3%
Return on equity9.8%-2.4%
Return on assets0.6%-0.4%
Return on invested capital18.0%0.5%
FCF yield13.6%28.5%
Dividend yield1.3%
Debt / equity0.000.26
Current ratio1.09
Altman Z (solvency)0.302.14
Piotroski F (quality)7 / 98 / 9
Full CNO report → Full OSCR report →
Get boothcheck's read on CNO and OSCR, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.