CNO Financial Group, Inc. (CNO): what the price requires
At today's price, CNO Financial Group, Inc. (CNO) is priced for 16.4% return on equity. boothcheck doesn't publish a fair value or a price target; it shows what the price assumes, so you can judge whether that bar is too high.
Generated: 2026-07-19 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/CNO
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | CNO |
| Company | CNO Financial Group, Inc. |
| Current price | $52.28/sh |
What The Price Requires (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Return on equity needed | 16.4% |
| Return on equity now | 8.7% |
| ROE gap | +7.7pp |
| Price-to-book | 1.95x |
Solve inputs: computed at a 10.3% cost of equity with 4% terminal growth over a 5-year stage, on common book equity (FY2026); each 1pp of cost of equity moves the implied ROE ~2pp.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~14.3%; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: within-range
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +1.71σ |
| cohort percentile (of 80 peers) | 54 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 56% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is justified by relative-multiple and growth-DCF; asset-based land below the price.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.84x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.30x | 2 | expensive |
| Relative | 0.60x | 3 | justifies |
| Growth | 1.01x | 1 | expensive |
Families that justify the price: Relative, Growth Families that call it expensive: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 1.9%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=9)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $25.99 | 2.01x | yes | TBVPS $25.99 × 1.00x (ROE (TTM) 9.8% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption), credit 0.51% allowance/loans → ×0.88) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | $37.09 | 1.41x | yes | P/E 13.84x (blended: static sector reference 11x + trailing (TTM) 20x), scenarios: 11.6x / 13.8x / 16.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA 19.19x |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $27.61 | 1.89x | yes | BV/sh $25.99, ROE (TTM) 9.8%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $28.43 | 1.84x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | $51.53 | 1.01x | yes | Rev $4.5B, growth 5% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 0.9x / 1.1x / 1.3x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 8x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | $87.15 | 0.60x | yes | EPS $2.49, growth 35% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.58 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | $38.16 | 1.37x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $2.49 × BVPS $25.99) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | $80.34 | 0.65x | yes | EPS $2.49 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | $93.37 | 0.56x | yes | EPS $2.49 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 25.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 37.5x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $26.92 | 1.94x | yes | EPS $2.49 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (buyback) | -5.6% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
CNO is an insurer, so the price is best read against book value and the returns earned on it. At $50.88 the stock trades near 2x book of about $26 per share on a return on equity running near 10%, which is a premium the business has to keep earning rather than one already banked.
The recent operating momentum is real: first-quarter 2026 operating EPS rose 33% to $1.05, the fifteenth straight quarter of sales growth, with Medicare and supplemental health doing the heavy lifting and management guiding full-year operating EPS to $4.25 to $4.45.
The balance sheet is an insurer's balance sheet, not a leverage story: about $38.8 billion of total assets against $2.6 billion of equity, with a commercial mortgage book near $1.8 billion and a long-term-care reserve that depends on rate increases regulators have to approve. The buyback is steady, with shares shrinking about 5.6% a year.
Bull Case
Insurers are hard to value because the product is a promise priced today and paid out over decades, so the honest anchor is book value and the return earned on it, not a revenue multiple. CNO reports $38.8 billion of total assets against $2.6 billion of shareholders' equity (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001224608-26-000017), book value near $26 per share, and a return on equity running close to 10%. The bull case is that this return is climbing and management has a credible plan to lift it further. Full-year 2026 guidance targets operating EPS of $4.25 to $4.45 and a run-rate operating return-on-equity improvement of about 200 basis points through 2027, and the first-quarter print backed it up with operating EPS up 33% to $1.05.
The distribution is the moat. CNO sells health, annuity, and individual life through exclusive agents, independent producers, and direct marketing into what it describes as attractive, underserved, high-growth middle-income markets (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001224608-26-000017). That exclusive-agent channel is hard to replicate and well suited to the supplemental-health and Medicare products that are growing fastest: the company posted its thirteenth consecutive quarter of producing-agent-count growth, with total Medicare policies sold up 24% and Medicare Supplement new annualized premium up 53% in the quarter. On the spread side, fixed indexed annuity premium collections rose 12.8% to about $1.74 billion in 2025 (accession 0001224608-26-000017), so the savings franchise is feeding the balance sheet at the same time the protection franchise grows.
The capital return turns a single-digit return on equity into double-digit per-share progress. CNO repurchased $60 million of stock in the quarter and returned $77 million to shareholders in total, the board authorized a fresh buyback, and shares outstanding have been shrinking roughly 5.6% a year. The dividend was raised. Across the model lenses, the relative-valuation read at a sector-median P/E near 17x lands close to the current price, and the earnings-growth and PEG-based methods, working off about $2.49 of trailing EPS, land well above it. For an insurer compounding book value, buying back stock, and lifting return on equity, paying around 2x book is a bet that the ROE-improvement plan and the Medicare tailwind hold, and the recent results say both are tracking.
Bear Case
The first thing chipping at the case is the durability of the spread itself. CNO is, underneath the growth headlines, an old-line life-and-health insurer whose economics rest on earning more on its investments than it credits to policyholders and reserves. It holds commercial mortgage loans of about $1.8 billion, roughly 6% of invested assets, plus a residential mortgage book (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001224608-26-000017), and it manages the relationship between asset and liability durations precisely because a mismatch shows up directly in the value of the franchise (accession 0001224608-26-000017). A return on equity near 10% against a cost of equity around 9% is a thin excess return; the asset-based valuation lenses, which value the business on book value plus the present value of returns earned above that cost, land in the high $20s, well below the $50.88 price (June 27, 2026). In other words, the methods grounded in the actual book of business say the premium to book is doing most of the work.
Long-term care is the legacy block that keeps the moat from being clean. CNO writes long-term-care business whose economics depend on actuarially justified rate increases it must file for and regulators must approve (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001224608-26-000017). That is an advantage that erodes if regulators slow-walk increases or claims experience worsens, and it is the kind of long-tail liability that has surprised the whole industry before. The reserve sits inside a present-value framework that flexes with discount-rate assumptions (accession 0001224608-26-000017), so a change in the rate environment can move the liability independently of how the business is selling.
The valuation leaves little room for the spread to compress. At about 2x book, the price already embeds the return-on-equity improvement plan succeeding; if rates fall and reinvestment yields drop, or if the long-term-care block requires reserve strengthening, the same multiple that flatters the stock on the way up reverses. It is worth noting the gap between the model and the analyst view: sell-side price targets cited around the upgrade clustered near $28 to $32, which is below the current price and closer to where the book-value and excess-return methods land than to where the stock trades. A buyer here is paying for growth and capital return to keep outrunning a structurally modest underlying return on equity.
Valuation
For a financial, the cleanest lens is book value and the return on it rather than a cash-flow DCF, and the methods sort accordingly. Book value sits near $26 per share with return on equity around 10% and a cost of equity near 9%, so the excess-return and residual-income methods, which capitalize the thin spread of ROE over the cost of equity onto book, land in the high $20s. The relative-valuation read, pricing the stock at a sector-median P/E near 17x off about $2.49 of trailing EPS, lands near $46, close to the current price. The growth-leaning methods that extrapolate recent EPS growth, such as the PEG and Peter Lynch reads, land far higher, in the $80s to $90s, which is exactly the disagreement to weigh: the asset lenses say the franchise is worth its book plus a modest premium, while the growth lenses say recent momentum justifies far more.
Reading the price as an implied assumption, at $50.88 the market is paying roughly 2x book for a business earning about 10% on equity, which is a premium that only makes sense if return on equity rises toward the 200-basis-point improvement management is guiding to. A reverse band built on the financials basis spans about $5 at the bear end, $15 at the base, and $27 at the bull end, reflecting how sensitive an insurer's intrinsic value is to the spread and reserve assumptions; the current price sits above that band, so the market is underwriting the optimistic end of the ROE path. Note that a handful of the X-ray methods that assume an industrial cash-flow or EV/EBITDA structure are not meaningful for an insurer and have been set aside; the book-value, relative, and earnings-based reads carry the weight here.
Catalysts
First-quarter 2026 was the recent set-piece and it was strong: operating EPS rose 33% to $1.05, beating estimates by about 12%, on revenue of roughly $1.03 billion. Management called it the fifteenth consecutive quarter of sales growth and the thirteenth of producing-agent-count growth, with total Medicare policies sold up 24% and Medicare Supplement new annualized premium up 53%. (Sources: CNO Financial Q1 2026 earnings call highlights and summary via Yahoo Finance; MarketBeat Q1 2026 earnings report.)
Management reaffirmed full-year 2026 guidance of $4.25 to $4.45 operating EPS, an 18.8% to 19.2% expense ratio, $200 to $250 million of free cash flow, and a plan to lift run-rate operating return on equity by about 200 basis points through 2027. The next read is the Q2 print, where the watch items are whether agent count and Medicare sales keep compounding and whether the investment spread holds if rates move.
On capital return, CNO repurchased $60 million of shares in the quarter, returned $77 million to shareholders in total, raised the dividend, and the board approved a further buyback, continuing the roughly 5.6% annual reduction in share count. On sentiment, JMP Securities upgraded the stock to Market Outperform citing favorable insurance conditions and improved catastrophe-loss trends, with cited analyst price targets clustering around $28 to $32. (Sources: AInvest coverage of the CNO upgrade ahead of Q1; CNO dividend history via StockAnalysis; Yahoo Finance dividend-raise coverage.)
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- UNM (Unum Group)
- FY2025 10-K: …Condition and Results of Operations - Ratings" contained herein in Item 7 for our current outlook, issuer credit, and financial strength ratings. See also further discussion in "Risk Factors" contained herein in Item 1A. 13 T able of Contents Competition There is significant competition among insurance companies for…
- FY2025 10-K: …a decrease in our other expense ratio. Within our Unum Poland line of business, we expect to drive growth by continuing to expand our existing distribution channels. We will also continue to invest in digital capabilities, technology, and product enhancements, which we believe will drive sustainable growth over the…
- PFG (PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP INC)
- FY2025 10-K: …the Business Owner Solutions segment offers growth opportunities and we will continue to develop strategies to capitalize on this expanding market. We distribute our individual life and individual disability insurance products through our affiliated financial representatives and independent brokers, as well as other…
- FY2025 10-K: #8203; $ 930.2 $ 861.2 $ 69.0 Year Ended December 31, 2025 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2024 Pre-Tax Operating Earnings Pre-tax operating earnings increased in our Investment Management operations primarily due to $58.3 million higher management fee revenue as a result of increased average AUM. This was…
- GNW (GENWORTH FINANCIAL, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …our results of operations, capital levels, RBC levels and financial condition would be materially adversely affected absent future premium rate increases and associated benefit reductions, and implementing other reduced benefit options. Our policyholders may not react as anticipated to our in-force rate increases. In…
- FY2025 10-K: …in-force and risk in-force for our Enact segment. Insurance in-force is a measure of the aggregate unpaid principal balance as of the respective reporting date for loans insured by our U.S. mortgage insurance subsidiaries. Risk in-force is based on the coverage percentage applied to the estimated current outstanding…
- AFG (AMERICAN FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …negative effect not only on AFG's business in that market but also on AFG's reputation generally. RISKS RELATING TO THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY Intense competition could adversely affect AFG's results of operations. The property and casualty insurance segment operates in a highly competitive industry that is affected by…
- FY2025 10-K: …the property and inland marine and crop insurance operations was 68 Table of Contents partially offset by lower underwriting profitability in the transportation businesses. Catastrophe losses were $66 million (2.3 points on the combined ratio), including $1 million in net reinstatement premiums, in 2024 compared to…
- CNA (CNA FINANCIAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. 8 Table of Contents Strategic Risks We face intense competition in our industry; we may be adversely affected by the cyclical nature of the property and casualty business and by the evolving landscape of our distribution network. All…
- FY2025 10-K: As such, only Insurance and Reinsurance receivables, Insurance reserves, Deferred acquisition costs, Goodwill and Deferred non-insurance warranty acquisition expense and revenue are readily identifiable for individual segments. Distinct investment portfolios are not maintained for every individual segment;…
- AIG (American International Group, Inc.)
- FY2025 10-K: …reserve discount and the portion of favorable or unfavorable prior year reserve development for which we have ceded the risk under retroactive reinsurance agreements and related changes in amortization of the deferred gain. Premiums Years Ended December 31, 2025 and 2024 Comparison Net premiums written increased by…
- FY2025 10-K: …Commercial segment consists of insurance businesses and operations in Middle East and Africa (EMEA region), the United Kingdom, Japan, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America and Caribbean, and China. The International Commercial segment also includes the results of Talbot Holdings Ltd. (Talbot) as well as AIG's Global…
- HMN (HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …reducing the value of our securities may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. Strategic Risks The personal lines insurance, retirement and supplemental group benefit markets are highly competitive and our financial condition and results of operations may be…
- FY2025 10-K: 9.7%; Indiana, 9.0%; and Iowa, 8.7%. Competition Competition in this market for employee benefit products is robust and consists of a number of national and regional carriers offering disability, accident, and health insurance, including Aflac, American Fidelity, Colonial (a subsidiary of Unum), Reliance Standard, The…
- THG (HANOVER INSURANCE GROUP, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …at acceptable margins, and we continue to seek rate increases across many lines of business, as appropriate. Personal Lines Personal Lines focuses on working with high quality, value-oriented agencies that deliver consultative selling to customers and stress the importance of total account solutions, which is the…
- FY2025 10-K: …ratings and effective claims handling, among other things. Our competitors include national, international, regional and local companies that sell insurance through various distribution channels, including independent agencies, captive agency forces, brokers, and direct to consumers, through the internet or…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.