← boothcheck

CI vs OSCR stock comparison

The Cigna Group vs Oscar Health, Inc., two Managed Care stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.

The margin lines cross in an odd place: Oscar Health posts the better operating margin, 15.2% against Cigna's 3.4%, yet nets out negative while Cigna keeps 2.3%, the gap between an individual-market insurer still below its cost of capital and a diversified giant that long ago made peace with thin. Cigna trades at 12 times earnings with a 2.1% dividend; Oscar has no multiple to quote. Both free-cash figures, 11.8% and 28.5%, are float first and yield second. Cigna's 14.8% return on equity against Oscar's negative 2.4% completes the maturity portrait. The pair prices insurance as an institution against insurance as a startup, and the institution currently costs less per dollar of everything.

Comparison updated 2026-07-10.

CI vs OSCR: the numbers

MetricCIOSCR
Price$282.39$29.79
Market cap$74.6B$9.8B
SectorManaged CareManaged Care
StageMatureGrowth
P/E12.0
P/B1.765.89
P/S0.270.74
EV/EBITDA5.6309.2
Revenue growth+8.9%+30.5%
Operating margin3.4%15.2%
Net margin2.3%-0.3%
Return on equity14.8%-2.4%
Return on assets4.1%-0.4%
Return on invested capital17.9%0.5%
FCF yield11.8%28.5%
Dividend yield2.1%
Debt / equity0.040.26
Current ratio0.821.09
Altman Z (solvency)2.642.14
Piotroski F (quality)6 / 98 / 9
Full CI report → Full OSCR report →
Get boothcheck's read on CI and OSCR, and what their prices are betting on, in your inbox. No hype, no spam.
Free. Informational only, not investment advice. Unsubscribe anytime.

Compare any two stocks

vs

The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.