CLEAN HARBORS, INC vs Waste Management, Inc, two Waste Management stocks. A side-by-side on valuation, growth, margins, returns, and what each price is betting.
Where CLH and WM diverge most: on debt / equity, CLH reads 1.00 and WM reads 0.06; on revenue growth, CLH reads +2.0% and WM reads +11.1%. The rest of the comparable metrics sit closer together. On valuation, today's CLH price has a different growth bar priced in than WM (+24.9% implied for CLH vs +8.5% for WM); the higher figure is the steeper assumption to clear, not a better or worse stock. What CLH's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). What WM's price implies is a bet that sits within the historical range (whole-company basis). The bull and bear cases for each are in their full reports below.
| Metric | CLH | WM |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $303.75 | $233.35 |
| Market cap | $16.1B | $94.4B |
| Sector | Waste Management | Waste Management |
| Stage | Mature | Mature |
| Implied growth (priced in) | +24.9% | +8.5% |
| P/E | 41.2 | 33.8 |
| P/B | 5.80 | 9.42 |
| P/S | 2.66 | 3.71 |
| EV/EBITDA | 16.7 | 13.0 |
| Revenue growth | +2.0% | +11.1% |
| Operating margin | 8.2% | 17.9% |
| Net margin | 6.5% | 11.0% |
| Return on equity | 14.3% | 27.9% |
| Return on assets | 5.2% | 6.1% |
| Return on invested capital | 9.2% | 33.5% |
| FCF yield | 2.9% | 3.5% |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.4% |
| Debt / equity | 1.00 | 0.06 |
| Current ratio | 2.34 | 0.93 |
| Altman Z (solvency) | 7.60 | 2.75 |
| Piotroski F (quality) | 4 / 9 | 7 / 9 |
Each week boothcheck ranks the stocks whose prices are betting on the most. Read the most stretched bets archive →
boothcheck is also on Android. Get the app on Google Play →
The stronger value is highlighted per metric where one is strictly better on that single number; it is not an overall verdict on either company. For informational and research purposes only. Not investment advice. Not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. boothcheck is not a registered investment adviser. Past performance does not guarantee future results.