WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP (WTFC): what the price assumes
In the published model solve dated 2026-Q2, anchored at $161.43, WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP (WTFC) is priced for more than 14.4% return on equity. boothcheck publishes no house fair value, target price, or buy/sell rating; individual model outputs and user-controlled scenarios are analytical inputs, not Boothcheck targets. Narrative composed 2026-06-28.
Generated: 2026-08-10 · Exported: 2026-08-12 · Source: https://boothcheck.com/report/WTFC
Headline
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Ticker | WTFC |
| Company | WINTRUST FINANCIAL CORP |
| Current price | $161.43/sh |
What The Price Assumes (Inversion)
The assumption today's price embeds, recovered by inverting the valuation.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Inversion basis | financials |
| Price-to-book | 1.48x |
| Return on equity now | 10.9% |
The implied return on book is non-physical at this price-to-book and is suppressed as misleading. The price sits beyond a 11.7% return on equity sustained for 40 years and is not resolvable as a sustainable-ROE point. The rarity read below is the honest signal.
Solve inputs: computed at a 11% cost of equity; ROE searched up to the 11.7% ROE ceiling.
Reconcile: at the x-ray's 9.3% required return this reads ~11.8%; the models below use their own rates.
How unusual the bet is: n/a
| Reference | Value |
|---|---|
| vs own history | +3.05σ |
| cohort percentile (of 166 peers) | 66 |
| sustained it ~10 years at this level | 62% |
| implied end-window share | 0% |
Valuation X-Ray
The price is supported by asset-based value. A value/asset-supported name, not a pure growth bet.
How the valuation models price the stock relative to the market price. Price/FV above 1.0 means the market pays more than that lens defends (expensive); at or below 1.0 the lens can defend the price.
| Family | Median price/FV | Models | Reads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asset | 1.05x | 3 | expensive |
| Earnings | 1.25x | 1 | expensive |
| Relative | — | 0 | — |
| Growth | — | 0 | — |
Families that justify the price: Asset
The models below discount at their own flat-beta convention rates (cost of equity 9.3%, WACC 9.1%); the inversion above states its own rate.
Per-Model Detail (n=4)
| Model | Family | FV | Price/FV | Applicable | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DCF Perpetual Growth | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Bank Fair Value (P/TBV) | — | $149.87 | 1.08x | yes | TBVPS $95.27 × 1.57x (ROE (TTM) 11.7% / CoE 9.3%, g=5.0% (sustainable: 65% retention × ROE, 5% cap; not the terminal-growth assumption)) |
| Relative Valuation | Relative | — | — | no | P/E 10x (static sector reference · 2026-04), scenarios: 8.0x / 10.0x / 12.0x (bear / base = reference held flat / bull), EV/EBITDA N/Ax |
| Simple DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Two-Stage DDM | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Simple Excess Return | Asset | $136.88 | 1.18x | yes | BV/sh $108.35, ROE (TTM) 11.7%, ke 9.3% |
| Two-Stage Excess Return | Asset | $153.07 | 1.05x | yes | 5yr excess ROE then converge to ke=9.3% |
| Discounted Future Market Cap | Growth | — | — | no | Rev $2.3B, growth 30% (input: historical growth; tapered), Terminal P/S: 3.9x / 4.8x / 5.8x (bear / base = today's held flat / bull, cap 12x) |
| Peter Lynch Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | EPS $11.93, growth 18% (input: historical EPS growth), PEG=0.71 (Undervalued) |
| Margin Trajectory | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Earnings Power Value | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Residual Income | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| Graham Number | Asset | $170.54 | 0.95x | yes | √(22.5 × EPS $11.93 × BVPS $108.35) — Graham's conservative floor |
| EV/EBITDA Relative | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| SBC-Adj FCF Yield | Earnings | — | — | no | — |
| Ben Graham Formula | Earnings | — | — | no | EPS $11.93 × (8.5 + 2×15.0%) × (4.4 / 5.3%) |
| ROIC-Justified P/B | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| P/Sales Sector | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| PEG Fair Value | Relative | — | — | no | EPS $11.93 × (PEG 1.5 × growth 18.0% (input: historical EPS growth)) → PE 26.9x |
| Earnings Yield | Earnings | $128.97 | 1.25x | yes | EPS $11.93 / required return 9.3% (Rf 4.3% + ERP 5.0%) |
| Funds From Operations Multiple | Relative | — | — | no | — |
| Clinical Phase NPV | Growth | — | — | no | — |
| Merton | Asset | — | — | no | — |
| V5 Mechanical | — | — | — | no | — |
Solvency
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Share count CAGR (dilution) | 4.1% |
Deposit/float-funded balance sheet: debt is funding, not corporate leverage, and GAAP operating cash flow follows loan flows. Net-debt, interest-coverage, and cash-burn lenses do not apply. The solvency frame for a financial is regulatory capital and payout capacity (CET1, stress buffer, dividends plus buybacks against earnings).
Bullet Takeaways
The market is paying about 1.4x book for Wintrust, which prices a return on equity beyond the 12.5% level that even elite banks sustain over decades. The bank has recently been earning closer to 10.9%, so the premium assumes the return keeps climbing.
The fundamentals are genuinely strong. Q1 2026 delivered a fifth straight record net income of $227.4 million, or $3.22 a share, up 20% year over year, with loans at $54.1 billion and deposits at $58.9 billion both growing 7% to 8% annualized and net charge-offs at just 0.14%.
The niche-lending model, premium finance, lease finance, and franchise lending, is the differentiator. The bank-fair-value and excess-return models land near the price, so this reads as a quality franchise trading at a deserved-but-full premium rather than a bargain.
Bull Case
The market is pricing Wintrust as a premium franchise, and for once the fundamentals back the premium rather than contradict it. At 1.4x book the stock is not cheap, but the bank just posted its fifth consecutive quarter of record net income, $227.4 million or $3.22 a share in Q1 2026, up 20% year over year. Net interest margin firmed to 3.54%, loans grew to $54.1 billion and deposits to $58.9 billion, each up roughly 7% to 8% annualized, and credit stayed pristine with net charge-offs of just 0.14% of average loans. When the price implies a return on equity climbing toward the top tier and the bank is delivering record earnings with improving margin and clean credit, the gap between price and fundamentals is narrower than the multiple alone suggests.
The engine behind the consistency is a set of specialty lending businesses that most regional banks do not have. The filing describes niche lending businesses including lease finance and franchise lending that operate on a national level, and a commercial-insurance-premium-finance operation whose profitability is the primary driver of that segment (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001015328-26-000007). Premium finance, lending to businesses to fund their property-and-casualty insurance premiums, is a counter-cyclical, high-turnover book that diversifies Wintrust away from pure spread banking and gives Q2 a seasonal tailwind, which management explicitly flagged. These businesses are why the bank can grow loans at a mid-to-high single-digit pace while keeping credit losses minimal.
The valuation models that fit a bank support the price rather than fight it. Tangible book value per share is about $95 and book value per share about $108, so the bank trades at a justifiable premium to a real, growing equity base. Against Chicago-market and regional peers like Old National and SouthState, Wintrust earns a higher return and grows faster, which is why 14 analysts carry a Strong Buy consensus with an average target near $168. The quarterly dividend of $0.55 adds a modest cash return on top.
Bear Case
The capital-allocation choice that should give a holder pause is how Wintrust funds its growth: it issues stock. The share count has been growing at roughly a 4% annual rate, so even as net income hits records, some of that growth is diluted away before it reaches per-share value. A bank that raises common equity to fund loan growth is making a defensible operating choice, but it is the opposite of the buyback discipline that compounds shareholder value at peers, and it means the headline 20% net-income growth overstates the per-share growth a holder actually captures. Book value per share grows more slowly than total equity for the same reason. At 1.4x book, paying a premium for a franchise that keeps issuing shares is a bet that management deploys that fresh capital at returns above its cost, which is not guaranteed in every cycle.
The price also assumes a return on equity that runs above the historical record. The implied return sits beyond the 12.5% level that even elite banks sustain over forty years, a bound the model cannot resolve as a stable point, while the bank has recently earned about 10.9%. The implied return runs well above what Wintrust has actually delivered, and historically only about 63% of firms reaching this kind of return sustained it over a decade. The price-to-book sits in the upper half of the peer group, so the easy re-rating is behind it.
The balance-sheet risks are the standard regional-bank set, with a specialty twist. The premium-finance and niche-lending books that diversify the franchise also concentrate exposure to insurance markets and specific commercial verticals, and the filing notes the average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits was 3.09% in 2025, a reminder that deposit costs remain elevated and pressure the margin (FY2025 10-K, accession 0001015328-26-000007). Commercial real estate grew in the quarter, adding to a book that is sensitive to a downturn. If credit normalizes from today's 0.14% charge-off rate, if deposit competition forces rates higher, or if the return on equity settles back toward the trailing 10.9%, a 1.4x book multiple priced for top-tier returns looks full rather than cheap.
Valuation
A bank is worth the return it earns on its capital, so the price reads off price-to-book rather than an operating multiple. At $154.08 against tangible book value per share of about $95 and book value per share of about $108, the stock trades near 1.4x book. The bank-specific price-to-tangible-book model lands near $150, the relative-multiple model at a roughly 10x sector P/E near $142, the simple excess-return model near $137, and the two-stage excess-return model near $153. These bank-appropriate methods cluster tightly around the price, which is why the overall characterization is value and asset-supported rather than a pure growth bet. The growth-extrapolation models (Peter Lynch, Ben Graham formula, PEG) print much higher numbers, but they assume the recent 18% EPS growth persists, which is not a safe anchor for a mature bank.
Inverting the price returns a bound rather than a point. At 1.4x book the price implies a return on equity beyond the roughly 12.5% level that top-tier banks sustain over decades, solved at a cost of equity near 11.2%, with the model flagging the assumption as above the ceiling. The honest statement is that the price assumes a return at or above the elite tier, not a specific solvable figure. The bank has recently earned about 10.9%, so the assumed return runs above its own record, which is why the overall characterization lands elevated, above what fundamentals comfortably support, even though the bank-appropriate models sit near the price.
The tension between that band and the clustered bank models reflects the difference between a strict reverse-DCF and the multiples the market actually pays for a high-quality grower. The practical read is that Wintrust is a strong franchise trading at a deserved but full premium, where the upside depends on the return on equity continuing to climb rather than reverting.
Catalysts
The Q1 2026 report set the recent bar: record net income of $227.4 million, or $3.22 a share, up 20% year over year, a fifth straight record, with net interest margin at 3.54% and net charge-offs at just 0.14%. The next earnings report is the key test, and Q2 has a built-in catalyst: management guided to a seasonal benefit from premium-finance lending, which tends to strengthen in the period, so the focus is whether that seasonal lift plus mid-to-high single-digit loan growth keeps the record streak alive.
Loan and deposit growth are the steady catalysts to watch, since the franchise compounds through organic balance-sheet growth rather than buybacks. Continued mid-to-high single-digit loan growth with stable credit would validate the premium multiple, while any uptick in charge-offs from the current low level would pressure it. Capital ratios are expected to improve, and the $0.55 quarterly dividend provides a modest cash return. Analyst sentiment is strongly positive, a Strong Buy consensus with an average target near $168 against a range of roughly $138 to $190. The chief risks to the timeline are deposit-cost pressure squeezing the margin, credit normalization in the commercial-real-estate and niche-lending books, and continued share issuance that dilutes the per-share growth a holder captures.
Sources: StockTitan: Wintrust posts record $227M Q1 profit; GuruFocus: WTFC Q1 2026 record net income; Quiver Quantitative: WTFC Q1 2026 earnings; Public.com: WTFC analyst forecast; Motley Fool: WTFC Q1 2026 transcript.
Peer Cohorts (Per Segment, With Filing Citations)
Core business (reported)
- ASB (Associated Banc-Corp)
- FY2025 10-K: . Failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, future prospects, financial condition or results of operations and could adversely affect our ability to successfully implement our business strategy. If we grow more slowly than anticipated, our operating results could be…
- FY2025 10-K: …the proportion of Commercial and Business, CRE, and Consumer loans within the overall loan portfolio. Furthermore, certain sub-asset classes within the respective portfolios are further defined and dollar limitations are placed on these sub-portfolios. These guidelines and limits are reviewed quarterly and approved…
- WBS (WEBSTER FINANCIAL CORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …lack a physical presence within our geographic footprint, but actively pursue business through digital channels and other remote means. Competition could intensify in the future as a result of industry consolidation, the increasing availability of products and services from non-bank organizations, including financial…
- FY2025 10-K: …risk pertaining to specific industries, geographies, property types, and other characteristics that may exist in its loan and lease portfolio. At both December 31, 2025, and 2024, commercial non-mortgage, commercial real estate, and multi-family loans comprised approximately 75% of the Company's loan and lease…
- VLY (VALLEY NATIONAL BANCORP)
- FY2025 10-K: $11.0 billion and represented 21.9 percent of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2025. Commercial real estate and construction loans totaled $29.2 billion and represented 58.3 percent of the total loan portfolio at December 31, 2025. Average interest earning assets in Commercial Banking segment decreased $1.6…
- FY2025 10-K: …our lower cost of funding sources. See details in the "Allowance for Credit Losses for Loans" and "Non-Interest Income" sections of this MD&A. The net interest margin for this segment increased 14 basis points to 3.59 percent for the year ended December 31, 2025 as compared to 2024, due to a 49 basis point decrease…
- ONB (OLD NATIONAL BANCORP /IN/)
- FY2025 10-K: …Old National has established underwriting standards such as minimum FICO scores, maximum loan-to-value ratios, and maximum debt-to-income ratios. Repayment of these loans depends largely on the personal income of the borrowers, which can be affected by changes in economic conditions such as unemployment levels.…
- FY2025 10-K: Net interest margin (1) 3.54 % 3.31 % Efficiency ratio: Noninterest expense $ 1,485,291 $ 1,094,423 Deduct: Intangible amortization expense 78,660 27,528 Adjusted noninterest expense (1) $ 1,406,631 $ 1,066,895 Net interest income - taxable equivalent basis (1) (see above) $ 2,086,285 $ 1,555,297 Noninterest income…
- COLB (COLUMBIA BANKING SYSTEM, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …and results of operations. 33 Table of Contents Substantial competition in our market areas could adversely affect us. Commercial banking is a highly competitive business. We compete with other commercial banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions and finance, insurance, and other non-depository companies…
- FY2025 10-K: …in the economy in general, material increases in interest rates, changes in tax and rent control policies, tightening credit or refinancing markets, or a decline in real estate values in the Bank's primary geographic footprint in particular, could have an adverse impact on the repayment of these loans. Loans secured…
- WAL (WESTERN ALLIANCE BANCORPORATION)
- FY2025 10-K: …credit with other financial institutions. Previously, the Company has also accessed the capital markets through trust preferred, credit linked note, and subordinated debt offerings. For additional information concerning the Company's deposits, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and…
- FY2025 10-K: …for 10% or more of consolidated or segment revenues. No material portion of the Company's lending business is seasonal. However, seasonality in the Company's mortgage warehouse deposits may impact lending activities. Competition The financial services industry is highly competitive and has been significantly impacted…
- FULT (FULTON FINANCIAL CORP)
- FY2025 10-K: …and implementation risks with respect to strategic projects and initiatives. If we are not able to adequately identify and manage the risks associated with new activities, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely impacted. RISKS RELATED TO COMPETITION Our ability…
- FY2025 10-K: …losses of $23.4 million for non-PCD Loans, partially offset by an elevated level of provision for credit losses in the same period in 2023 due to a $13.3 million charge-off for a commercial office loan. 50 Non-Interest Income The following table presents the components of non-interest income: Increase (Decrease) 2024…
- FHB (FIRST HAWAIIAN, INC.)
- FY2025 10-K: …majority of our business is with customers located within Hawaii. Our operations are heavily concentrated in Hawaii, as well as in Guam and Saipan. As a result of this geographic concentration, our results depend largely on economic conditions in these and surrounding areas. As discussed above, deterioration in…
- FY2025 10-K: …performance and allocates resources. In addition, during the third quarter of 2025, we made changes to the internal measurement of segment operating profits for the purpose of evaluating segment performance and resource allocation. The primary reason for the change was to align loan and deposit balances within the…
Methodology Note
- Priced-in inversion: the valuation is inverted on the current price to recover the operating-income growth, duration, and steady-state margin the price embeds (ROE for financials, FFO growth for REITs).
- Valuation x-ray: the valuation models, grouped into four families (asset, earnings, relative, growth). Each model is expressed as a price/FV ratio (distance from price), not a point fair-value estimate. The spread across families is the disagreement.
- Solvency: net cash/debt, net-debt-to-NOPAT, interest coverage, and share-count CAGR from EDGAR financials (net debt / FFO and fixed-charge coverage for REITs; regulatory-capital framing for financials).
- Peer cohorts: per-segment comparables with deep-linkable SEC filing citations.
Fundamentals sourced from SEC EDGAR filings. Current price from Databento. The priced-in inversion and valuation x-ray are computed by the boothcheck engine; narrative composed by AI from the structured data.